Modalworks Intake Review
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Modalworks Intake Review
Hello MB folks,
Wanted to give my brief review of the Modalworks C63 Polymer Carbon Fiber Intake
Pricing and Sizing
There are two different sizing options, OEM size and 82mm size, both costing 620 and 685 USD respectively. I opted for the 82mm size intakes.
The OEM size reuses the stock rubber coupler that attaches the intake to the turbo, while the 82mm has a larger outlet.
I asked Modalworks about this, they say that they recommend the 82mm size for those that have upgraded turbos, or plan to do so. Both sizes will work on stock turbos.
Installation
If you opt for the OEM size intake, installation will be relatively easy. However, if you opt for the 82mm, installation will be a PITA.
This is because there is a hard glue (see photo below) that attaches the stock couplers to the circulation ports. I was not able to remove these myself, so I went to my local shop (2 hours labor).
If you don't plan on upgrading turbos, I suggest sticking with OEM size if you want easy installation.
Here is what they look like when installed. Notice that there ports on each intake for the intake sensors.
Subjective Enjoyment
Intake make cool whoosh sound, big like
Intake Air Temperatures
Unfortunately, I do not have any data for IATs on stock vs MW intakes. (I don't really know how you would measure this, maybe data logging?)
Therefore, I cannot make any conclusion on if these intakes negatively affect performance due to higher IATs, or if these intakes even cause higher IATs at all.
There is already lots of discussions and theories about how bad these intakes are for IATs. From my perspective, if there is no data, logging, or performance testing, no decisive conclusion can be made.
Either way, if temps are a concern, I would upgrade 3 piece radiators, trans split cooling, and perhaps run water methanol injection.
If anyone has data on this, it would be good to add to this thread.
Performance
I do not have any dyno runs, the only metric I have to test performance is dragy 60-100mph runs.
I would have liked to do 60-130mph, but I would rather not.
Here are the best runs I could do on stock and MW intakes respectively.
Mod list: Weistec ECU + CPC, FI catless DP, MW intakes
Stock Intakes
MW Intakes
I made these runs on the same road. There is an appreciable difference in DA in favor of the MW intakes, but I am not sure how much of a difference that would make.
It is important to note that these runs are on stock turbos. For upgraded turbos, it is reasonable to assume that the gap between these intakes will widen.
Apart from my own basic testing, MW claims that the fastest 60-130 record uses these very intakes. Mtech also claims to have a 1/4 mile WR C63 that is also powered by MW intakes.
Check Engine Light
For my car (2021), these intakes cause CEL.
I have tried using a CAN OBD2 scanner, but I am not seeing any codes. Selecting "Clear codes" seems to clear the cel for a while, but it will eventually come back.
I called MW about this, they just suggested to re-check the sensor connections.
The most direct solution would be to tune out any intake sensor related codes, I will contact Weistec about this and update this post.
I know someone on social media who has a PFL model with these exact intakes and have never experienced any cel, so maybe it has something to do with FL models.
Any insight would be appreciated.
Conclusion
Overall, I enjoy these intakes. They make a cool sound and seem to improve performance based on my experience. My only regret is the CEL, which I currently don't know how to fix.
If I am able to fix the CEL, I see no problem in highly recommending these intakes for those interested.
Cheers!
Wanted to give my brief review of the Modalworks C63 Polymer Carbon Fiber Intake
Pricing and Sizing
There are two different sizing options, OEM size and 82mm size, both costing 620 and 685 USD respectively. I opted for the 82mm size intakes.
The OEM size reuses the stock rubber coupler that attaches the intake to the turbo, while the 82mm has a larger outlet.
I asked Modalworks about this, they say that they recommend the 82mm size for those that have upgraded turbos, or plan to do so. Both sizes will work on stock turbos.
Installation
If you opt for the OEM size intake, installation will be relatively easy. However, if you opt for the 82mm, installation will be a PITA.
This is because there is a hard glue (see photo below) that attaches the stock couplers to the circulation ports. I was not able to remove these myself, so I went to my local shop (2 hours labor).
If you don't plan on upgrading turbos, I suggest sticking with OEM size if you want easy installation.
Here is what they look like when installed. Notice that there ports on each intake for the intake sensors.
Subjective Enjoyment
Intake make cool whoosh sound, big like
Intake Air Temperatures
Unfortunately, I do not have any data for IATs on stock vs MW intakes. (I don't really know how you would measure this, maybe data logging?)
Therefore, I cannot make any conclusion on if these intakes negatively affect performance due to higher IATs, or if these intakes even cause higher IATs at all.
There is already lots of discussions and theories about how bad these intakes are for IATs. From my perspective, if there is no data, logging, or performance testing, no decisive conclusion can be made.
Either way, if temps are a concern, I would upgrade 3 piece radiators, trans split cooling, and perhaps run water methanol injection.
If anyone has data on this, it would be good to add to this thread.
Performance
I do not have any dyno runs, the only metric I have to test performance is dragy 60-100mph runs.
I would have liked to do 60-130mph, but I would rather not.
Here are the best runs I could do on stock and MW intakes respectively.
Mod list: Weistec ECU + CPC, FI catless DP, MW intakes
Stock Intakes
MW Intakes
I made these runs on the same road. There is an appreciable difference in DA in favor of the MW intakes, but I am not sure how much of a difference that would make.
It is important to note that these runs are on stock turbos. For upgraded turbos, it is reasonable to assume that the gap between these intakes will widen.
Apart from my own basic testing, MW claims that the fastest 60-130 record uses these very intakes. Mtech also claims to have a 1/4 mile WR C63 that is also powered by MW intakes.
Check Engine Light
For my car (2021), these intakes cause CEL.
I have tried using a CAN OBD2 scanner, but I am not seeing any codes. Selecting "Clear codes" seems to clear the cel for a while, but it will eventually come back.
I called MW about this, they just suggested to re-check the sensor connections.
The most direct solution would be to tune out any intake sensor related codes, I will contact Weistec about this and update this post.
I know someone on social media who has a PFL model with these exact intakes and have never experienced any cel, so maybe it has something to do with FL models.
Any insight would be appreciated.
Conclusion
Overall, I enjoy these intakes. They make a cool sound and seem to improve performance based on my experience. My only regret is the CEL, which I currently don't know how to fix.
If I am able to fix the CEL, I see no problem in highly recommending these intakes for those interested.
Cheers!
#2
Senior Member
Great writeup and review! Keep us posted on the CEL issue... maybe check the sensor extension cables for a connection issue (not connecting properly to stock wiring or sensor; broken / loose wiring)?
#4
Intake Air Temperatures
Unfortunately, I do not have any data for IATs on stock vs MW intakes. (I don't really know how you would measure this, maybe data logging?)
Therefore, I cannot make any conclusion on if these intakes negatively affect performance due to higher IATs, or if these intakes even cause higher IATs at all.
There is already lots of discussions and theories about how bad these intakes are for IATs. From my perspective, if there is no data, logging, or performance testing, no decisive conclusion can be made.
Either way, if temps are a concern, I would upgrade 3 piece radiators, trans split cooling, and perhaps run water methanol injection.
If anyone has data on this, it would be good to add to this thread.
Unfortunately, I do not have any data for IATs on stock vs MW intakes. (I don't really know how you would measure this, maybe data logging?)
Therefore, I cannot make any conclusion on if these intakes negatively affect performance due to higher IATs, or if these intakes even cause higher IATs at all.
There is already lots of discussions and theories about how bad these intakes are for IATs. From my perspective, if there is no data, logging, or performance testing, no decisive conclusion can be made.
Either way, if temps are a concern, I would upgrade 3 piece radiators, trans split cooling, and perhaps run water methanol injection.
If anyone has data on this, it would be good to add to this thread.
Quick Simple non-technical test... After some time driving, is the intake hot or cold to the touch?
#6
I have had these intakes now pretty much since they came out. Average drop on 60-130 has typically been around the .7-.8 range without flashing a new tune. Currently at 5.39 60-130 so they work pretty well. Your P700/800 may not be a result of the sensor. If the shop did not get your prongs in the coupler they can come out which causes the same code so check there as well.
The following users liked this post:
vodand12 (02-03-2024)
#7
Super Member
They look like giant beans
Not going to lie these are the funniest looking intakes I've ever seen but they seem to work so hey... function over form
If these were plain black inc the filter and didn't have a big "MW" words I'd buy for sure
If these were plain black inc the filter and didn't have a big "MW" words I'd buy for sure
Trending Topics
#8
Junior Member
Thread Starter
I have had these intakes now pretty much since they came out. Average drop on 60-130 has typically been around the .7-.8 range without flashing a new tune. Currently at 5.39 60-130 so they work pretty well. Your P700/800 may not be a result of the sensor. If the shop did not get your prongs in the coupler they can come out which causes the same code so check there as well.
#11
Junior Member
Thread Starter
No, I've driven in heavy rain conditions and haven't had any issues. Water shouldn't be getting into the engine bay in general.
#12
Hello MB folks,
Wanted to give my brief review of the Modalworks C63 Polymer Carbon Fiber Intake
Pricing and Sizing
There are two different sizing options, OEM size and 82mm size, both costing 620 and 685 USD respectively. I opted for the 82mm size intakes.
The OEM size reuses the stock rubber coupler that attaches the intake to the turbo, while the 82mm has a larger outlet.
I asked Modalworks about this, they say that they recommend the 82mm size for those that have upgraded turbos, or plan to do so. Both sizes will work on stock turbos.
Installation
If you opt for the OEM size intake, installation will be relatively easy. However, if you opt for the 82mm, installation will be a PITA.
This is because there is a hard glue (see photo below) that attaches the stock couplers to the circulation ports. I was not able to remove these myself, so I went to my local shop (2 hours labor).
If you don't plan on upgrading turbos, I suggest sticking with OEM size if you want easy installation.
Here is what they look like when installed. Notice that there ports on each intake for the intake sensors.
Subjective Enjoyment
Intake make cool whoosh sound, big like
Intake Air Temperatures
Unfortunately, I do not have any data for IATs on stock vs MW intakes. (I don't really know how you would measure this, maybe data logging?)
Therefore, I cannot make any conclusion on if these intakes negatively affect performance due to higher IATs, or if these intakes even cause higher IATs at all.
There is already lots of discussions and theories about how bad these intakes are for IATs. From my perspective, if there is no data, logging, or performance testing, no decisive conclusion can be made.
Either way, if temps are a concern, I would upgrade 3 piece radiators, trans split cooling, and perhaps run water methanol injection.
If anyone has data on this, it would be good to add to this thread.
Performance
I do not have any dyno runs, the only metric I have to test performance is dragy 60-100mph runs.
I would have liked to do 60-130mph, but I would rather not.
Here are the best runs I could do on stock and MW intakes respectively.
Mod list: Weistec ECU + CPC, FI catless DP, MW intakes
Stock Intakes
MW Intakes
I made these runs on the same road. There is an appreciable difference in DA in favor of the MW intakes, but I am not sure how much of a difference that would make.
It is important to note that these runs are on stock turbos. For upgraded turbos, it is reasonable to assume that the gap between these intakes will widen.
Apart from my own basic testing, MW claims that the fastest 60-130 record uses these very intakes. Mtech also claims to have a 1/4 mile WR C63 that is also powered by MW intakes.
Check Engine Light
For my car (2021), these intakes cause CEL.
I have tried using a CAN OBD2 scanner, but I am not seeing any codes. Selecting "Clear codes" seems to clear the cel for a while, but it will eventually come back.
I called MW about this, they just suggested to re-check the sensor connections.
The most direct solution would be to tune out any intake sensor related codes, I will contact Weistec about this and update this post.
I know someone on social media who has a PFL model with these exact intakes and have never experienced any cel, so maybe it has something to do with FL models.
Any insight would be appreciated.
Conclusion
Overall, I enjoy these intakes. They make a cool sound and seem to improve performance based on my experience. My only regret is the CEL, which I currently don't know how to fix.
If I am able to fix the CEL, I see no problem in highly recommending these intakes for those interested.
Cheers!
Wanted to give my brief review of the Modalworks C63 Polymer Carbon Fiber Intake
Pricing and Sizing
There are two different sizing options, OEM size and 82mm size, both costing 620 and 685 USD respectively. I opted for the 82mm size intakes.
The OEM size reuses the stock rubber coupler that attaches the intake to the turbo, while the 82mm has a larger outlet.
I asked Modalworks about this, they say that they recommend the 82mm size for those that have upgraded turbos, or plan to do so. Both sizes will work on stock turbos.
Installation
If you opt for the OEM size intake, installation will be relatively easy. However, if you opt for the 82mm, installation will be a PITA.
This is because there is a hard glue (see photo below) that attaches the stock couplers to the circulation ports. I was not able to remove these myself, so I went to my local shop (2 hours labor).
If you don't plan on upgrading turbos, I suggest sticking with OEM size if you want easy installation.
Here is what they look like when installed. Notice that there ports on each intake for the intake sensors.
Subjective Enjoyment
Intake make cool whoosh sound, big like
Intake Air Temperatures
Unfortunately, I do not have any data for IATs on stock vs MW intakes. (I don't really know how you would measure this, maybe data logging?)
Therefore, I cannot make any conclusion on if these intakes negatively affect performance due to higher IATs, or if these intakes even cause higher IATs at all.
There is already lots of discussions and theories about how bad these intakes are for IATs. From my perspective, if there is no data, logging, or performance testing, no decisive conclusion can be made.
Either way, if temps are a concern, I would upgrade 3 piece radiators, trans split cooling, and perhaps run water methanol injection.
If anyone has data on this, it would be good to add to this thread.
Performance
I do not have any dyno runs, the only metric I have to test performance is dragy 60-100mph runs.
I would have liked to do 60-130mph, but I would rather not.
Here are the best runs I could do on stock and MW intakes respectively.
Mod list: Weistec ECU + CPC, FI catless DP, MW intakes
Stock Intakes
MW Intakes
I made these runs on the same road. There is an appreciable difference in DA in favor of the MW intakes, but I am not sure how much of a difference that would make.
It is important to note that these runs are on stock turbos. For upgraded turbos, it is reasonable to assume that the gap between these intakes will widen.
Apart from my own basic testing, MW claims that the fastest 60-130 record uses these very intakes. Mtech also claims to have a 1/4 mile WR C63 that is also powered by MW intakes.
Check Engine Light
For my car (2021), these intakes cause CEL.
I have tried using a CAN OBD2 scanner, but I am not seeing any codes. Selecting "Clear codes" seems to clear the cel for a while, but it will eventually come back.
I called MW about this, they just suggested to re-check the sensor connections.
The most direct solution would be to tune out any intake sensor related codes, I will contact Weistec about this and update this post.
I know someone on social media who has a PFL model with these exact intakes and have never experienced any cel, so maybe it has something to do with FL models.
Any insight would be appreciated.
Conclusion
Overall, I enjoy these intakes. They make a cool sound and seem to improve performance based on my experience. My only regret is the CEL, which I currently don't know how to fix.
If I am able to fix the CEL, I see no problem in highly recommending these intakes for those interested.
Cheers!
#14
#15
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Well, if you're swapping the OEM couplers for the larger ones, they should be properly installed. There are two or three ports per intake, depending on model year, that should all be reconnected to the coupler.
#16
I’m talking about these hoses that connected to the old air box can they be left there just like that?
#17
Junior Member
Thread Starter
This will cause a "blow off" sound when going off-throttle, but there is nothing to be concerned about. You're just venting the air to the "atmosphere" instead of the airbox.
#18
Oh those. Those are meant to recirculate air back to the airboxes. Since the airboxes are gone, you can just remove both hoses.
This will cause a "blow off" sound when going off-throttle, but there is nothing to be concerned about. You're just venting the air to the "atmosphere" instead of the airbox.
This will cause a "blow off" sound when going off-throttle, but there is nothing to be concerned about. You're just venting the air to the "atmosphere" instead of the airbox.
#19
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Anyways, I have Modalworks BOV on the way, which is a complete BOV replacement, will be making a forum post about those soon.
The following users liked this post:
jonlop11 (05-04-2024)
#20
Yes, i have Weistec VTA adapters. I don't know their exact purpose, since it doesn't change anything mechanically. Maybe it just changes the sound?
Anyways, I have Modalworks BOV on the way, which is a complete BOV replacement, will be making a forum post about those soon.
Anyways, I have Modalworks BOV on the way, which is a complete BOV replacement, will be making a forum post about those soon.
#21
Junior Member
Thread Starter
The valves can also purge air during light acceleration in certain gears/speeds. I noticed the valves will constantly purge air in comfort mode, during low speed, light acceleration.