CL55 AMG, CL65 AMG, CL63 AMG (C215, C216) 2000 - 2014 (Two Generations)

cl 65 rear wheel offset

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Apr 26, 2009 | 09:07 PM
  #1  
anton28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 428
Likes: 11
2023 Rover
cl 65 rear wheel offset

We installed the Lorinser LM5 wheels from my 03 cl55 on my friends 06 S65 and the rears stick out. Do the 55 and 65 have diffrient rear wheel offset? Even looking at the factory 65 wheels i notised that compared to the factory 55 wheels there is alot less lip.
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2009 | 06:56 AM
  #2  
hyelifeCL's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 139
Likes: 2
CL600, E30 325i Previous ride CL55 2004
44 VS 60.
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2009 | 11:41 PM
  #3  
anton28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 428
Likes: 11
2023 Rover
Originally Posted by hyelifeCL
44 VS 60.
so is it the rear end thats diffrient or the rear brakes. I would think that since both cars are amg they would have the same rear.
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2009 | 01:04 AM
  #4  
whoover's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,278
Likes: 377
From: San Jose area
'19 E63S sedan
Originally Posted by anton28
so is it the rear end thats diffrient or the rear brakes. I would think that since both cars are amg they would have the same rear.
You seem not to like the answer you got, but it's (mostly) right. The CL55 rears have a 46mm offset (non-AMG models with the sport package are 44mm), but S65 rear wheels are ET 60.

The rear suspension setup is different.

BTW, all front wheels on staggered setups, non-AMG sport models, 55s and 65s, have a 44 mm offset.

Another BTW is that the 65 has a wider track, front and rear, by 4 mm than all other W220s, including 55s. There are quite a few detail differences in suspension parts that are not obvious.

Last edited by whoover; Apr 29, 2009 at 01:15 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2009 | 07:49 AM
  #5  
TRAKCAR's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 161
Likes: 16
From: S. Florida
S550 coupe
The rear suspension setup is different.

Another BTW is that the 65 has a wider track, front and rear, by 4 mm than all other W220s, including 55s. There are quite a few detail differences in suspension parts that are not obvious.
What, exactly is different on the suspension?
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2009 | 12:37 PM
  #6  
Vic55's Avatar
Administrator
MBWorld Ambassador

20 Year Member
Liked
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 12,263
Likes: 901
From: THE Orange County, California
2024 C8 Z06- 2025 BMW CS- 2022 Porsche 992 GTS
I had the same issue with my CL65- I wanted a nice lip and the offset sucked. Its the hub that sticks out more on the CL65 than its smaller brothers 600 and 55.
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2009 | 02:35 AM
  #7  
anton28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 428
Likes: 11
2023 Rover
so before i ask, i know that this would be a step back so please lets save the coments

what would you need to change in the rear in order to be able to have the
cl55 offset. As funny as it sounds i would purchase a cl600 and not a 65 if i couldnt put a set of wheels on it that i wanted.
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2009 | 10:51 AM
  #8  
whoover's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,278
Likes: 377
From: San Jose area
'19 E63S sedan
Originally Posted by anton28
so before i ask, i know that this would be a step back so please lets save the coments

what would you need to change in the rear in order to be able to have the
cl55 offset. As funny as it sounds i would purchase a cl600 and not a 65 if i couldnt put a set of wheels on it that i wanted.
I assume you would need to start by downgrading the brakes to make room. The drive shafts are different, and might be part of why the spacing is different and the track is wider. You might therefore need to swap out the rear end and go to the non-reinforced version used on the 600. Assuming you can then align the car to 600 specs, you would have reduced the rear track by four mm, and would need to do surgery on the front as well or the car could be very unstable. My guess is that you would need to downgrade the front brakes and stub axles are realign the car. At that point the ABC tuning will be off, because it has been modified to work with the 65 chassis. You would need to reprogram the ABC computer with the 600 program as well, and possibly other telematics like ESP, which are fairly sensitive to chassis geometry.

These are all guesses, though. For a definitive answer you need access to MB parts diagrams and alignment specs.

If the look of your wheels is the most important thing for you and you can't find suitable wheels for the 65 chassis, a 600 would be a much better solution.
Reply
MB World Stories

The Best of Mercedes & AMG

story-0

6 Mercedes Models That Did NOT Age Well (But Are Somehow Still Cool)

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun

 Verdad Gallardo
story-2

Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction

 Verdad Gallardo
story-5

Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve

 Verdad Gallardo
story-8

Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping

 Verdad Gallardo
story-9

10 Most Reliable Mercedes-Benz Models You Can Buy Used

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Apr 30, 2009 | 06:12 PM
  #9  
AMG 17GT's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,005
Likes: 711
From: ATLANTA
R Nine T
Originally Posted by whoover
I assume you would need to start by downgrading the brakes to make room. The drive shafts are different, and might be part of why the spacing is different and the track is wider. You might therefore need to swap out the rear end and go to the non-reinforced version used on the 600. Assuming you can then align the car to 600 specs, you would have reduced the rear track by four mm, and would need to do surgery on the front as well or the car could be very unstable. My guess is that you would need to downgrade the front brakes and stub axles are realign the car. At that point the ABC tuning will be off, because it has been modified to work with the 65 chassis. You would need to reprogram the ABC computer with the 600 program as well, and possibly other telematics like ESP, which are fairly sensitive to chassis geometry.

These are all guesses, though. For a definitive answer you need access to MB parts diagrams and alignment specs.

If the look of your wheels is the most important thing for you and you can't find suitable wheels for the 65 chassis, a 600 would be a much better solution.

Interesting. I tried to ask this question in a cl65 thread, and maybe you could clarify.

The cl65 had brabus monoblock vi wheels. I have a meager cl500 with sport package. I was told the wheels wouldnt fit because of offset. They were originally on an 07 sl550.

Your logic suggests the cl65 is harder to fit and thus if those wheels fit on a cl65 than most certainly they will fit on the cl500, correct?

Ty in advance for clarity.

Paul
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2009 | 06:53 PM
  #10  
whoover's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,278
Likes: 377
From: San Jose area
'19 E63S sedan
Originally Posted by ROMEO550
Your logic suggests the cl65 is harder to fit and thus if those wheels fit on a cl65 than most certainly they will fit on the cl500, correct?

Ty in advance for clarity.

Paul
No. All that we can say is that the correct rear offset for a CL65 is 60 mm and for the CL500, 44 mm (assuming we're talking about 19" wheels). Correct offset for an SL550 rear wheel is 9.5 X 19 ET 31 or 10 X 19 ET 28. Assuming the wheels were close to correct for the SL, they have too low an offset for any CL.
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2009 | 09:04 PM
  #11  
AMG 17GT's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,005
Likes: 711
From: ATLANTA
R Nine T
Originally Posted by whoover
No. All that we can say is that the correct rear offset for a CL65 is 60 mm and for the CL500, 44 mm (assuming we're talking about 19" wheels). Correct offset for an SL550 rear wheel is 9.5 X 19 ET 31 or 10 X 19 ET 28. Assuming the wheels were close to correct for the SL, they have too low an offset for any CL.
Ok so why am i seeing 20's on a cl65 with the big brakes and big suspension fit, and they wont fit on a cl500 with the sport pack?

They never looked right on the sl anyhow. I called Brabus and they claimed my size were correct. 19X 8.5 and 19X 9.5.....


You are right i have the 19's., so I am confused.

Last edited by AMG 17GT; Apr 30, 2009 at 09:18 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2009 | 09:21 PM
  #12  
whoover's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,278
Likes: 377
From: San Jose area
'19 E63S sedan
Originally Posted by ROMEO550
Ok so why am i seeing 20's on a cl65 with the big brakes and big suspension fit, and they wont fit on a cl500 with the sport pack?
Because the CL65 and CL500 take rear wheels with a different offset. Take it up with the AMG engineers. They moved things around in back on a 65 so that more of the wheel needs to extend inboard from the face that mounts to the hub than on the stock CL. I don't know why they did, but they must have had good reasons. So if you put a wheel meant for a 65 on a 500 it will rub on the inside. If you put a wheel meant for a 500 on a 65 it will stick out past the fender. More importantly, the wrong offset means the tire is not contacting the ground where it's supposed to, and will affect handling, tire wear and put strain on the suspension. Offset is determined by the engineers, and must not be ignored.
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2009 | 09:26 PM
  #13  
whoover's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,278
Likes: 377
From: San Jose area
'19 E63S sedan
Originally Posted by ROMEO550
They never looked right on the sl anyhow. I called Brabus and they claimed my size were correct. 19X 8.5 and 19X 9.5.....


You are right i have the 19's., so I am confused.
Maybe you don't know that offset is that third number. 8.5 X 19 ET 30 and 8.5 X 19 ET 60 wheels are both 8.5 X 19 and will look identical at first blush. But the mounting surface will be about an inch further in on one that the other. That's because they have offsets that are 30 mm different. All three numbers have to be right. The first two don't tell you enough to know if it is a proper fitment for your car.
Reply
Old May 1, 2009 | 10:18 AM
  #14  
AMG 17GT's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,005
Likes: 711
From: ATLANTA
R Nine T
Originally Posted by whoover
Maybe you don't know that offset is that third number. 8.5 X 19 ET 30 and 8.5 X 19 ET 60 wheels are both 8.5 X 19 and will look identical at first blush. But the mounting surface will be about an inch further in on one that the other. That's because they have offsets that are 30 mm different. All three numbers have to be right. The first two don't tell you enough to know if it is a proper fitment for your car.
Ok ty for explanation.

Obviously, I was hopeful they would fit.

Anyone in the market for 2 piece Monoblocks? P.M. if interested.

paul
Reply
Old May 1, 2009 | 10:53 PM
  #15  
anton28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 428
Likes: 11
2023 Rover
well that sucks, because to me the only set of wheels that looks good on a w215 are the lorinser LM5's. Cant put those on the 65 with out them looking goofy and that sucks.
Reply
Old May 2, 2009 | 01:45 PM
  #16  
Patentmat's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 415
Likes: 0
From: Davis
Sucks for my Monoblock VIs too, I was someday considering moving up from the 55 to the 65 and just keeping the big footwide tires. I may have to rethink things . . .
Reply
Old May 2, 2009 | 04:14 PM
  #17  
AMG 17GT's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,005
Likes: 711
From: ATLANTA
R Nine T
Originally Posted by Patentmat
Sucks for my Monoblock VIs too, I was someday considering moving up from the 55 to the 65 and just keeping the big footwide tires. I may have to rethink things . . .
SO YOU HAVE THE MONOBLOCKS ON YOUR CL55?

NOW I AM TOTALLY CONFUSED.

HAHAHAH WILL THEY FIT ON MY CL500 OR NOT!!
Reply
Old May 2, 2009 | 04:28 PM
  #18  
AMG 17GT's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,005
Likes: 711
From: ATLANTA
R Nine T
Well to clear the air, I just called Brabus and they will fit on the cl 500. My wheel has a 45 offset so it works.

Hope this helps anyone else.
Reply
Old May 2, 2009 | 06:57 PM
  #19  
Patentmat's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 415
Likes: 0
From: Davis
That's great news. I hate to keep this issue going - but don't you need flared fenders to get them to squeeze under? My tires are TIGHT in the back, two, no three sheets of paper at the most for the wheel to tuck up into the fender
Reply
Old May 3, 2009 | 10:25 AM
  #20  
AMG 17GT's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,005
Likes: 711
From: ATLANTA
R Nine T
Originally Posted by Patentmat
That's great news. I hate to keep this issue going - but don't you need flared fenders to get them to squeeze under? My tires are TIGHT in the back, two, no three sheets of paper at the most for the wheel to tuck up into the fender

Well you have 20s and mine are 9.5 in rear. Brabus said to use 275 35 on rears. Maybe you can go to 295s and get a little extra space.

Anyway we obviously love the wheel and i am glad it works for both of us.
Reply
Old May 3, 2009 | 12:31 PM
  #21  
Patentmat's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 415
Likes: 0
From: Davis
Originally Posted by ROMEO550
Maybe you can go to 295s
Hahaha - Never!

They may be tight but they still fit.
Attached Thumbnails cl 65 rear wheel offset-photo.jpg  
Reply
Old May 10, 2009 | 02:42 PM
  #22  
hyelifeCL's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 139
Likes: 2
CL600, E30 325i Previous ride CL55 2004
I think that the OEM CL65 wheels are very very nice and would not change them at all if I had a 65.
Reply
Old May 24, 2009 | 02:37 PM
  #23  
tamini's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
cl65
need to find some rims for a 2006 cl65

I am having a problem finding some replacement rims for my 2006 cl65. Most of the rims out there don't fit.. Anyone have any suggestions of some good looking rims that work?

I reading some inconsistent messages on the offsets and sizes?? The originals are front: 19x8.5 offset 44mm and the Rear: 19x9.5 offset 46mm.
Is it different and what sizes can I change to without damaging the car and incurring more headaches???

Last edited by tamini; May 24, 2009 at 02:40 PM.
Reply
Old May 26, 2009 | 10:24 PM
  #24  
Pontonowner's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
CL55
I have a CL55 and just bought stock SL65 wheels (the ones that are either titanium or silver with bolts and twin spokes). They were from a SL55 and fit that car fine. I thought they would fit my car but it looks like the offsets are off. Does anyone know if I can have the wheels milled to correct the offset? It seems there is plenty of meat where it attaches to the hub and there is plenty of clearance for the calipers. Any suggestions would be helpful, even if it means selling them and starting fresh. Thanks.
Attached Thumbnails cl 65 rear wheel offset-100_1861.jpg   cl 65 rear wheel offset-100_1862.jpg  
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2009 | 07:16 PM
  #25  
rchoe618's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
W215 CL65 & w221 S63
anyone has right 20 in wheel offset size and tire size for 06 CL65 ?
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:34 AM.

story-0
6 Mercedes Models That Did NOT Age Well (But Are Somehow Still Cool)

Slideshow: Not every Mercedes design becomes timeless, some feel stuck in the era they came from.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:09:07


VIEW MORE
story-1
Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun

Slideshow: Yes, Mercedes built manual cars, and some of them are far more interesting than you'd expect.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-02 12:36:58


VIEW MORE
story-2
Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren

Slideshow: A one-of-one U.S.-spec Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren Roadster became even rarer after a factory-backed transformation at McLaren's headquarters.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-29 11:19:28


VIEW MORE
story-3
8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine

Slideshow: Before curves took over, Mercedes mastered the art of the straight line, and some of those shapes still look right today.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-25 12:05:49


VIEW MORE
story-4
Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction

Slideshow: The 190E Evolution II shows how a homologation necessity became a six-figure collector icon.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-22 17:53:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know

Slideshow: Mercedes is turning one of its core nameplates electric, and the details show just how serious this shift is.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-21 13:58:06


VIEW MORE
story-6
Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know

Slideshow: Faster charging, longer range, and a controversial steer-by-wire system define the latest evolution of Mercedes-Benz EQS.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-15 10:35:34


VIEW MORE
story-7
5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve

Slideshow: These overlooked Mercedes-Benz models never got the spotlight, but they quietly delivered more than most remember.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-13 19:35:45


VIEW MORE
story-8
Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping

Slideshow: A well-used 1991 Mercedes-Benz 300D with more than one million miles is now looking for a new owner, and it still appears ready for more.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-10 10:05:15


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Most Reliable Mercedes-Benz Models You Can Buy Used

Slideshow: From bulletproof sedans to surprisingly tough SUVs, these Mercedes models proved that the three-pointed star can go the distance.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-08 09:55:49


VIEW MORE