v12 is no donkey. I mean think about it. It has 4 cylinders more than a v8, now throw two turbos on it... surely no donkey and opens the door to huge power with a simple tune.

 

Right. But how sad 4 more cylinders and can't beat the 55k stock? I find it sad that a simple tune is needed to beat me. Wow!! What a waist

 

Are you sure you raced a TT V12 and not the NA version? A stock CL600 TT will eat a CL55/E55/CLS55. A modded one will rape those cars. A stock CL65 will rape a tuned CL600 TT. A tuned CL65 rapes all!!!

R.K.

 

Well, I was right there with you, until the highlighted portion.

But yes, a stock 600 is quicker than a stock 55K, regardless of what MB or the magazines state. The 600 cars were grossly underrated by MB, so they didn't undercut themselves on sales of the 55K AMG cars.

A tuned 600 is indeed quicker than a stock 65
A tuned 65 is marginally quicker, if any, than a tuned 600.

Case in point is my tuned SL600 that is the current 1/4mile record holder at 11.02@126mph. A stock SL65 runs about 11.50-.60@123-124, and a tuned SL65 runs 11.00-.10


Either way, it's quite obvious that the OP will never be educated by any of us on the V12TT platform. He can't even formulate a proper sentence, and has no idea how to use grammar.

So, OP....enjoy your new wheels.

 

Can I get a pic of said waist?

 

I told you guys this fool was a clown....I'm embarrassed for all 55K owners

 

How I didn't know I was publishing book to watch my grammar! I'm not denying the power of a v12. I'm just saying that a stock cl55 and a stock v12 = tie!! Don't be mad because this is a fact! Watch YouTube videos for your reference. Also check out ecabs comment here. You guys are on denial!!!! Losers!

 

lol

i cant tell if 559cl55amg is just a total clown..... or a really good troll

 

100% clown and fail troll IMO

 

One word... Hater!

 

Thank god he's learning............

 

is that your comeback every time somebody disagrees with you?

 

You guys are retards! Whatever you say.

 

We can't hear you over your mouthbreathing.... Uh oh, I must be a "hater"

 

Your quote is stupid! Ahahha what a looser

 

what's is LOOSER??

 

Listen here: It's fully possible for a stock cl55 and a stock cl65 to be running side by side to 60-80 or so. Traction issues are the cause. At the 1/4, if the 65 is behind (it won't be), it'll be GOBBLING up the distance. In my experience, the 65, all things being equal, will trap between 8-10 MPH higher than the 55. While you MAY be able to hang from stoplight to stoplight in a quick 0-~60 jaunt, the 65 will pull the hell out of you on the top. Same goes for a tuned 600.

Respect the v12tt cars, or they'll make you look like a fool.

 

The irony is delicious

 

Don't like them.



























I think a certain word beginning with the letter "H" is about to be said by the OP

 

QUOTED for da troof
and the concave wheels look great! i think they look better on the SL'S but still a better look on the CL'S than most wheel set ups i've seen.

 

wheels look good mang

 

appreciate the love guys. Some people just can't appreciate.

 

Here's one...just look at the dash, CL55 has 200 on the dash, CL600 160----they are pretty even stock, the 600 has a lot more HP potential with a simple tune, however it is not an ///AMG car. no big brakes, no AMG performance----55=sport 600=luxury sure you can make a 600 a lot faster with less tuning, but the 55 has a lot more performance that comes with the car already. This was a hard choice when I was in the market for a CL, but I ended up with a 55 vs the 600 for the simple fact that its a ///AMG. Cheers

 

The logic is strong in this one...

 

Good points. The interior on the 600's looks much nicer IMO
and as has been stated a $1,000 tune get's you 65 power and then some