CL55 AMG, CL65 AMG, CL63 AMG (C215, C216) 2000 - 2014 (Two Generations)

W216 cl63 AMG break calipers down-grade vs W215 55?!?!?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 07-17-2013, 10:42 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
anton28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 385
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
2014 Rover, 2014 Viper
W216 cl63 AMG break calipers down-grade vs W215 55?!?!?

I just inspected the brakes on my cl63 and to my surprise and shock the front calipers are nothing more then two separate one piston calipers bolted to one braket and fited with AMG covers that make it appear to be a 6 or 8iston caliper. WTF?... The rear is a much smaller one piston caliper, again with a AMG cover on the outside to make it appear like its a 2 or maybe a 4 piston caliper. What is this all about? Why did they not install the same 6 piston fronts and 4 piston rear calipers on these cars like the old cl55 cars had? I'm very confused about this right now.

Last edited by anton28; 07-18-2013 at 02:39 AM.
Old 07-22-2013, 01:44 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
anton28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 385
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
2014 Rover, 2014 Viper
No one here has questioned this?
Old 07-22-2013, 02:09 PM
  #3  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
radride's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,505
Received 65 Likes on 51 Posts
2015 Challenger Hellcat, 2023 Ram 3500, 2005 E55 Wagon, 2019 GLC63s
That's the first I'm hearing about this...

R.K.
Old 07-22-2013, 02:11 PM
  #4  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
biker349's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,924
Received 37 Likes on 35 Posts
cl600
a bit off topic, but i was quoted 2, 21/2 hours to replace the rear pads and rotors on 2004 cl600. seems a bit high. what do you guys think?
thanks
Old 07-22-2013, 02:12 PM
  #5  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
radride's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,505
Received 65 Likes on 51 Posts
2015 Challenger Hellcat, 2023 Ram 3500, 2005 E55 Wagon, 2019 GLC63s
Originally Posted by biker349
a bit off topic, but i was quoted 2, 21/2 hours to replace the rear pads and rotors on 2004 cl600. seems a bit high. what do you guys think?
thanks
I would say 1 hr max.

R.K.
Old 07-22-2013, 03:48 PM
  #6  
Member
 
NISMO240SSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
CL63 N/A 2008
I noticed the same thing when I did my rear pads, and the pads are the same as a ML, but the braking works on my 63 similar to the my 55 so I'm not too worried.
Old 07-23-2013, 05:05 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Alex L's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 276
Received 29 Likes on 22 Posts
CLK56TT (WIP), S65, RR 5.0 S/C
It's not the number of pistons, it's the area they cover that matters.
Old 07-23-2013, 10:26 AM
  #8  
alx
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
alx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,268
Received 248 Likes on 214 Posts
the 60-0 distances for both car are pretty much identical (112-115 feet) and is limited by front tire contact patch vs. weight over tires (static + dynamic weight). stopping power is not the limiting factor.

on the other hand multi-piston calipers are more complex and more prone to sticking so the newer calipers are addressing this a bit. divide and conquer strategy is used in this case.

rear calipers are pretty much irrelevant as in emergency brake situations the rears are used strictly to keep the rear tucked going in the direction of the turn of the steering wheel (via abs + stability control). rear braking force is really not used for stopping purposes. in that sense simple dual piston (or even single piston- sliding type) calipers are sufficient.
Old 07-23-2013, 01:01 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
anton28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 385
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
2014 Rover, 2014 Viper
Seems very cheap in my opinion. You don't see this type of brake set up on any other performance sedan. Every other line of AMG cars is using the big monoblock calipers. C, E CLS, SL etc. The car does top very well but I wouldn't consider this set up being a performance break set up by any stretch.

As far as

"on the other hand multi-piston calipers are more complex and more prone to sticking so the newer calipers are addressing this a bit. divide and conquer strategy is used in this case"

Ive had zero issues with any of my cars with 6-8 piston calipers. If anything this w216 set up is so much more to maintain then the w215 brake set up as far as replacement pads and rotors.

Last edited by anton28; 07-23-2013 at 01:04 PM.
Old 07-23-2013, 02:59 PM
  #10  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
bhamg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,899
Received 92 Likes on 81 Posts
C63 AMG
[QUOTE=anton28;5716878]I just inspected the brakes on my cl63 and to my surprise and shock the front calipers are nothing more then two separate one piston calipers bolted to one braket and fited with AMG covers that make it appear to be a 6 or 8iston caliper. WTF?[QUOTE]
I have one word for this...LAME.
Old 07-23-2013, 03:23 PM
  #11  
alx
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
alx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,268
Received 248 Likes on 214 Posts
Originally Posted by anton28
Seems very cheap in my opinion. You don't see this type of brake set up on any other performance sedan. Every other line of AMG cars is using the big monoblock calipers. C, E CLS, SL etc. The car does top very well but I wouldn't consider this set up being a performance break set up by any stretch.

As far as

"on the other hand multi-piston calipers are more complex and more prone to sticking so the newer calipers are addressing this a bit. divide and conquer strategy is used in this case"

Ive had zero issues with any of my cars with 6-8 piston calipers. If anything this w216 set up is so much more to maintain then the w215 brake set up as far as replacement pads and rotors.
nascar has some of the nastiest braking requirements and yet their front calipers are four piston simple big calipers. number of pistons increases complexity and reduces reliability.

they work. what else you want from brakes?
Old 07-23-2013, 05:45 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
anton28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 385
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
2014 Rover, 2014 Viper
[QUOTE=bhamg;5723296][QUOTE=anton28;5716878]I just inspected the brakes on my cl63 and to my surprise and shock the front calipers are nothing more then two separate one piston calipers bolted to one braket and fited with AMG covers that make it appear to be a 6 or 8iston caliper. WTF?
I have one word for this...LAME.

Exactly!!!
Old 07-23-2013, 05:47 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
anton28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 385
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
2014 Rover, 2014 Viper
Originally Posted by alx
nascar has some of the nastiest braking requirements and yet their front calipers are four piston simple big calipers. number of pistons increases complexity and reduces reliability.

they work. what else you want from brakes?
I understand that they work. What i don't understand of why AMG went out of their way to fit these cars with this set up VS every other model with the big monoblock calipers.

Even if they do work. Im sure everyone here would pick the 6/4 piston set up vs this crappy ****.
Old 07-26-2013, 03:11 PM
  #14  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Quadcammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Clifton, NJ
Posts: 4,949
Likes: 0
Received 37 Likes on 32 Posts
96 and 08 911 turbos
Originally Posted by anton28
I understand that they work. What i don't understand of why AMG went out of their way to fit these cars with this set up VS every other model with the big monoblock calipers.

Even if they do work. Im sure everyone here would pick the 6/4 piston set up vs this crappy ****.
why is it crappy **** if it works and the car brakes well?

If MB made brake pads and calipers made of banana peels yet they stopped the car as well as the 6 piston calipers, I would be fine with banana brakes.
Old 11-19-2013, 12:19 PM
  #15  
Super Member
 
PHML's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Waikele, Oahu, Hawaii
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
2011 GLK350 P1, Multi-media & AMG Pkg; 2010 E350 w/ prem 2; 2018 4Runner SR5 Prem. 4x4
interesting discussion.

In this day and age, ppl are piston hungry….they believe more piston = better the stopping power…at least that's what we are lead to believe, right? LOL!!

I've taken apart calipers and rebuilt them….and the multiple piston calipers obviously have more moving parts. They also have much much smaller pistons.

The double single-piston design now employed on the CL63 are probably much bigger pistons compared to the CL55 6-pot caliper w/ smaller pistons. The stopping power is probably the same…just my 2 cents.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: W216 cl63 AMG break calipers down-grade vs W215 55?!?!?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:47 PM.