CLK-Class (W208) 1998-2002: CLK 200, CLK 230K, CLK 320, CLK 430 [Coupes & Cabriolets]

My Supercharger :0)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rating: Thread Rating: 2 votes, 5.00 average.
 
Old 09-20-2005, 03:13 AM
  #1  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
Josh K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: The Heights, CA
Posts: 2,781
Received 12 Likes on 10 Posts
Tesla Model S
My Supercharger :0)

Well as many of you who know me have seen, I haven't been on the boards much lately. Things have been very busy (which is a good thing) and I haven't had much time for recreational activities.

However,

As today was my first (somewhat) free day, I went down to House of Power to dyno my newly supercharged car.

Before I get to the numbers, let me just say that having the car worked on exposed quite a few little problems that I suppose are normal on a 108k mile car. If you want to know what will most likely go wrong with your high mileage car, read this

1. Left motor mount needed to be replaced (this is the third one)
2. Crank Pulley needed to be replaced (per the recall - still waiting for my refund on this one)
3. Mass Air Meter (POS) was on it's way out before I dropped off the car and had to be replaced. I'm going to consider Mass air meters a 50k mile part.
4. Tranny fluid was filthy! As most of you know, "lifetime fluid" is a crock. I would say that it needs to be changed every 40k-50k miles or so.

Now, on to the good stuff:

Here she is! I still haven't had time to clean the motor, but I think it looks alright for going through 5 years and 108k miles of my "tender loving care."



I have a couple more plans for the appearance (polishing the valve covers, making a custom engine cover from Blue CF/Kevlar) but I love the way the kit looks. The kit uses a Greddy Blow-off valve - it sounds so cool to hear a Benz go "psshhhh," and as I love the sound of a centrifugal charger, I opted for the "loud" one that has an audible whine :0)

Here's a dyno sheet with it's pre and post install graphs:



Aside from a Remus exhaust and this supercharger kit, this car has no other performance mods (i.e. Pulleys, Software, etc.)
The car feels very well mannered around town, but hauls *** when asked to. The more gas it's gets, the more power it gives. Half throttle from a 30 mph roll breaks the tires loose, and when you step on it, it never stops pulling. :0). No drivability issues whatsoever, and on a fast paced run up Glendora Canyon in the San Gabriel Valley heat, temps hovered around 80°. During freeway driving, the needle is always below 80°.

These numbers were obtained using stock software. When Josh R of HoP gets back from vacation, we're going to experiment with a different FMU, as well as do a dyno pass with some stock wheels to see how much my 40 lb. Carlssons are costing me.

All in all, my car is a completely different animal. Whereas before I would never even bother to watch myself get my *** kicked by an STi, they're easy pickings now :0). The price was right, it has the race inspired look I love, and the performance is incredible. Only thing that sucks is that this has really brought back my speed bug. I'm already looking into how to take this car to the next level. Stay tuned...
Old 09-20-2005, 03:20 AM
  #2  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
SiLvaC32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Santa Barbara Cali
Posts: 2,302
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C32
SWEEEEEEEEET!! josh! congrats! =) now we can race, hehehe
Old 09-20-2005, 07:03 AM
  #3  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Chappy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Hotlanta
Posts: 9,731
Received 62 Likes on 53 Posts
AMG
Congrats!
Old 09-20-2005, 07:06 AM
  #4  
Out Of Control!!
 
vraa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 28,933
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Siiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiick!
Old 09-20-2005, 07:25 AM
  #5  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
midget fidger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Orlando
Posts: 3,347
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
E550 Coupe
wow that's a HUGE max improvement! one thing though, how come on the graph it shows less power and torque below 5250rpm?
Old 09-20-2005, 08:15 AM
  #6  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
lowphat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Northern Virginia / D.C.
Posts: 1,056
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
00 KLEEMANN CLK 430 - 02 KLEEMANN CLK55 - 88 Euro / Jap AMG 560 SEC Widebody
Congrats Josh Your engine looks awesome You are now officially show AND go
Old 09-20-2005, 08:28 AM
  #7  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
J Lucas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The President must win the Peace
Posts: 1,300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by midget fidger
wow that's a HUGE max improvement! one thing though, how come on the graph it shows less power and torque below 5250rpm?
Which graph is that?
Old 09-20-2005, 08:38 AM
  #8  
Super Member
 
ThrillKill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 592
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
CLK/ML
Congratulations Josh!!! That Kevlar cover sounds interesting, and I hope your not using that Denatured Alcohol as a fuel additive, heh heh!
Old 09-20-2005, 09:16 AM
  #9  
Super Member
 
E55Freak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Littleton, CO
Posts: 929
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
2005 E55 silver
I got to get me one of them!!
Old 09-20-2005, 09:44 AM
  #10  
Out Of Control!
 
JamE55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: CA, NV, CO
Posts: 21,005
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Congrats Josh! Engine looks awsome bro! So what's next? You should bring that bad boy to the Oct 15th meet.
Old 09-20-2005, 11:23 AM
  #11  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
mmgrad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: So Cal
Posts: 5,289
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
W213 '17 E43 ///AMG - W211, W208 no more
Nice... very nice... what you gonna do with your hooptee now that you gotz ur speed bug back.... u get out of ur clk, and into your hooptee... don't try cutting off any semi's
Old 09-20-2005, 12:38 PM
  #12  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
CurYousGee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 1,178
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2000 CLK 430
wow!
Old 09-20-2005, 01:26 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
Bagher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1999 CLK430
very nice. is this faster than a CLK55 or about the same?
Old 09-20-2005, 01:34 PM
  #14  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
Josh K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: The Heights, CA
Posts: 2,781
Received 12 Likes on 10 Posts
Tesla Model S
Originally Posted by Bagher
very nice. is this faster than a CLK55 or about the same?
My car is faster. Stock CLK55's dyno between 285 and 300.
Old 09-20-2005, 01:46 PM
  #15  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
MARK CUMMINS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Jacksonville Florida
Posts: 3,858
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
209/W210 Estate /W211 modded by MBENZNL
Looks Sweet!..Soooo When Do I Get a Demo?
Old 09-20-2005, 01:57 PM
  #16  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
midget fidger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Orlando
Posts: 3,347
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
E550 Coupe
oops ignore the comment about the graph. i thought light red = before while dark red = after
Old 09-20-2005, 02:22 PM
  #17  
CHB
Super Member
 
CHB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: BC
Posts: 946
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
'79 300D, '85 300Dt, '99 CLK430
Awesome system! Congrats I can't wait to see videos and how much power with you get with stock rims
Old 09-20-2005, 02:24 PM
  #18  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
str8ridin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,879
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 5 Posts
05 E55
Kick ***! Amesome numbers too. The 430 V8 is already a monster on the highway....I can only imagine what it can do now with boost. What kind of software did you use or did they just modify your air/fuel ratio to compensate? Also, if you could guess, what kind of 1/4 times would you expect?

Awesome job man...
Old 09-20-2005, 02:30 PM
  #19  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
Josh K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: The Heights, CA
Posts: 2,781
Received 12 Likes on 10 Posts
Tesla Model S
Originally Posted by str8ridin
Kick ***! Amesome numbers too. The 430 V8 is already a monster on the highway....I can only imagine what it can do now with boost. What kind of software did you use or did they just modify your air/fuel ratio to compensate? Also, if you could guess, what kind of 1/4 times would you expect?

Awesome job man...
I plan on taking it to the track and editing together a cool dyno vid as soon as I get some more free time. All of the results were obtained using stock software. As I have a 2000 model, my car still runs the 2.8 software (pre-01). I'm not sure if this has any effect on HP.
Old 09-20-2005, 09:11 PM
  #20  
Super Member
 
bbearden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 626
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
'03 E55 (My Daily), '01 ML 320 (Wifey), Twin Turbo '69 Camaro (In Progess)
Nice setup Josh! Very clean install and they did a great job with the tubing. What PSI are you running and are you able to use 91 octane since this is a non-intercooled kit? Are those dyno number's at the crank? I assume you're running low boost...around 4-5 PSI. I've been toying with the idea of getting a HOP setup on my ride but I am curious if the transmission is going to hold up or not. I have a 99 430 so my trans is the older type. Any idea if it is any weaker than the 00+ transmissions? Thanks!
Old 09-20-2005, 09:39 PM
  #21  
Member
 
splib's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: San Diego
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2000 CLK430 Cabrio
A 55% HP gain just from adding an SC? Wow! Am I reading that right?
Old 09-20-2005, 09:52 PM
  #22  
Super Member
 
Co 55 AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Mile High City
Posts: 621
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
W208
Kick ****ing A$$!!!!
Old 09-20-2005, 10:24 PM
  #23  
Super Member
 
bbearden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 626
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
'03 E55 (My Daily), '01 ML 320 (Wifey), Twin Turbo '69 Camaro (In Progess)
55% can be achievable but it would seem very tough to do with low boost and no intercooler. With an IC, gains of over 100% are achievable with the right setup.
Old 09-21-2005, 12:51 AM
  #24  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
Josh K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: The Heights, CA
Posts: 2,781
Received 12 Likes on 10 Posts
Tesla Model S
Originally Posted by bbearden
Nice setup Josh! Very clean install and they did a great job with the tubing. What PSI are you running and are you able to use 91 octane since this is a non-intercooled kit? Are those dyno number's at the crank? I assume you're running low boost...around 4-5 PSI. I've been toying with the idea of getting a HOP setup on my ride but I am curious if the transmission is going to hold up or not. I have a 99 430 so my trans is the older type. Any idea if it is any weaker than the 00+ transmissions? Thanks!
The supercharger is running 8psi of peak boost. All dyno numbers are rear wheel numbers and were obtained using 91 octane pump gas.

An intercooler isn't required on a low boost centrifugal as the adiabatic efficiency is high and discharge temps are lower than a comparable roots or autorotor setup. Higher boost applications would use an aftercooler.

If your tranny is properly and regularly serviced, it should be fine.
Old 09-21-2005, 01:24 AM
  #25  
Super Member
 
bbearden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 626
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
'03 E55 (My Daily), '01 ML 320 (Wifey), Twin Turbo '69 Camaro (In Progess)
Those are very impressive numbers, given that our rides put out around 235 HP or so at the rear wheels from the factory. I know the Vortech's have a relatively high adiabatic efficiency, I'm just surprised that there is no detonation with 8 psi, given that the static CR on our ride is close to 10.25:1. Sounds like HOP has got their **** together. Did it take them long to tune the car once the blower was installed, or was it as easy as adjusting an FMU?


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 2 votes, 5.00 average.

Quick Reply: My Supercharger :0)



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:01 AM.