CLK-Class (W209) 2003 on: CLK 270 CDI, CLK 200K, CLK 200 CGI, CLK 240, CLK 320, CLK 350, CLK 500, CLK 550 [Coupes & Cabriolets]

22x9.5 Fits! Lowered 2005 Clk320

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 02-02-2006, 02:27 AM
  #26  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Josh K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: The Heights, CA
Posts: 2,781
Received 12 Likes on 10 Posts
Tesla Model S
Originally Posted by Imelda
Remember...
Ride is based By The Vehicle Not by The Tires Profile.
Ride was never sacrificed.
Sorry but that's completely inaccurate. A smaller sidewall results in less flex = more road harshness transmitted to the car. There is certainly a difference in ride quality from your stock setup to what you have now.

Originally Posted by Imelda
-No performance is missing.
-No Braking/Stopping issues.
Also, I can assure you that you are missing performance whether you think you are or not. By going with 22's in the back you have effectively raised your final drive ratio. Your car already has a pretty tall 2.82 rearend ratio; it's most certainly higher now, which does lead to a loss in bottom end performance. Furthermore, your wheels are heavier and your car now has considerably more unsprung weight to get rolling (and to stop). Had you done a before/after dyno as well as a 100-0 stop distance test both before and after you'd certainly see a difference in torque and braking performance.

I'm not sure what the effects of varying front vs. rear diameters will have on the ESP system but I don't know enough about it to speak intelligently. ;0)

That being said, have fun. It's original, I'll give you that.
Old 02-02-2006, 05:36 AM
  #27  
Senior Member
 
clkcrazy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CLK 430
They said 22's wouldnt fit but they lying...hey do what you gotta do..its your ride..
Old 02-02-2006, 05:44 AM
  #28  
Member
 
S2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
06 CLK 500 / 07 Honda Ridgeline
Not my thing, but congrats on the 22's. Might want to think about a brake upgrade to fill in the extra space.
Old 02-02-2006, 06:41 AM
  #29  
Member
 
onkelmarknr1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Heidelberg
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CLK 500 Convertible
lets see some pic's from distance
Old 02-03-2006, 03:06 PM
  #30  
Almost a Member!
Thread Starter
 
Imelda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
More pics coming saturday 2/4/05 @ 6 pm pacific.
Set your alarm clocks. its going to be goooooood!
Old 02-03-2006, 03:09 PM
  #31  
Almost a Member!
Thread Starter
 
Imelda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What would you recommend...
Mr. Give me a "Brakeman"
Old 02-03-2006, 03:29 PM
  #32  
Almost a Member!
Thread Starter
 
Imelda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I Respect Everything you say...
and your right! I could probably "Read the diffrence"
However...
I Dont Race,
But when i do... (at the Track)
I "Bring It On" With my husbands 1996 SS "R1 Impala"
(ZR1 MOTOR) "525 Hp to the wheels!" "6 Speed"
(1/4 mile @ 10.9 sec)
Very fast Feeling in a 5,000 lbs. car.
The CLK was more of a "Stuck in traffic" Car.
Was bought for comfort.
My G35 is my "Late to work car"
...Follow what i'm saying.
BTW have you herd of "TRACY G"? (Rock Musician in your Area)
-Peace.
Old 02-03-2006, 04:20 PM
  #33  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Josh K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: The Heights, CA
Posts: 2,781
Received 12 Likes on 10 Posts
Tesla Model S
Originally Posted by Imelda
I "Bring It On" With my husbands 1996 SS "R1 Impala"
(ZR1 MOTOR) "525 Hp to the wheels!" "6 Speed"
(1/4 mile @ 10.9 sec)
Very fast Feeling in a 5,000 lbs. car.
And no pics???? Come on, don't tease me like that :0)))
Old 02-03-2006, 06:01 PM
  #34  
Member
 
S2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
06 CLK 500 / 07 Honda Ridgeline


And I'm guessing you could move up to SL65 AMG roters with 22" That's quite the space that need filling.


Originally Posted by Imelda
What would you recommend...
Mr. Give me a "Brakeman"
Old 02-04-2006, 08:39 AM
  #35  
Almost a Member!
Thread Starter
 
Imelda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by S2000


And I'm guessing you could move up to SL65 AMG roters with 22" That's quite the space that need filling.
WHAT'S A HONEST PRICE?
WHERE CAN THEY BE INSTALLED IN LA OR OC
Any complications with Brembo?
REMEMBER...
I am running 20x8.5 in the Front and 22x9.5 in the Rear.
HELP!
Old 02-04-2006, 08:32 PM
  #36  
Member
 
S2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
06 CLK 500 / 07 Honda Ridgeline
http://www.tirerack.com/brakes/resul...5&autoModClar=

$2800 - $3200 depends on size (355mm ??? maybe a little bigger)

Installation = what ever a local brake/speed shop will charge

There should not be any complications. You should have better braking, but that would be in a panic stop or on a track. Under normal driving these brakes are going to perform the same as the factory brakes. But they will fill up more of the space generated by the 20" and 22".

There are other brake upgrade kits out there, the red and gold will DEFINATELY be seen with your Rim/Color combo.

-hope this helps
Old 02-04-2006, 11:33 PM
  #37  
Almost a Member!
Thread Starter
 
Imelda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I Thank You for the info.

However, If I read the info from the link you supplied...
The price is Per axle correct?
Aprox. Brembo set-up for all four corners
is $5,000 - $6,000. (aprox.)?

Last edited by Imelda; 02-04-2006 at 11:36 PM.
Old 02-05-2006, 12:05 AM
  #38  
Member
 
S2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
06 CLK 500 / 07 Honda Ridgeline
Yes, give or take.

Mods aren't cheap, but either is looking good...

-post pics when you get them.
Old 04-30-2017, 12:16 PM
  #39  
Newbie
 
j_williams1992's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2004 Mercedes CLK 320
clk 0n 22

could you help me I have a 04 clk 320 the back wheel is 22s 10.5 wide what size tire do I need for the back?
Old 04-30-2017, 01:33 PM
  #40  
Member
 
Merc Mania's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Ghana, West Africa
Posts: 213
Received 20 Likes on 18 Posts
1985(W126)500SE, 1994(W124)E420 1991(R129)500SL and The Mothership 2009 CLK550
The horror. The horror. The horror. If a fashion police force is ever created to arrest vehicular fashion offenders and haul them in for fair trial followed by short spells in the pokey, I would turn state's informant for free.
Old 06-07-2020, 04:15 PM
  #41  
Newbie
 
Fadduh Spraket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2007 clk 350 coupe
2007 clk 350 coupe

Originally Posted by Frisco
I can't say I'm feeling it, it reminds me of this look
​​​​​​Can 22" fit the front if its not lowered?

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: 22x9.5 Fits! Lowered 2005 Clk320



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:46 PM.