Which is a Nicer Coupe- CLK '02 or CLK '03?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2002 CLK:
(Positive)
Tough Chunky Style Mercedes that looks like you could drive it through a concrete wall....and walk away!
(Negative)
Looks like your Dad's MB, not the IT professional's MB.
Interior needs updating.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2003 CLK:
(Positive)
Sleek, sexy, better handling, better interior.
Chris Bangle from BMW didn't design it. <-- couldn't resist!
Drives more like a Mercedes used tooo...years ago!
(Negative)
It's hard to tell it apart form other MB's
Borrows a lot from the C class
What's with the rear calipers?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Just a few points...
He decide to trade a new one W209/CLK
just K/D.
Last edited by Shine; Sep 24, 2002 at 11:29 AM.
W208 - Muscular look and has more of an E-class touch.
Rides a little rough with the V8, but handles great!
W209 - New look is a bit generic and tends to get lost in the
crowd, too much borrowing from the C-class
Ride is much improved and handling is better than ever!
I still have not completely fell in love with the W209!!!!
To fall in love with the W209, you must see it in person or see it cruising down the road.
The 209 is a sweet looking car, and it still screams MB!
thats wat i thik at first...i dont like the new CLK...freom the pic it doesnt look that nice
but after i saw it in person it was love at first sight
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
but anyway either model is nice
but i personally think the 2003 is way better in term of looks like many others do
put an AMG bodykit and it will look agressive(the 320)
besides i dont think the w208 look maskuline/tough.....
i think the w208 looks feminine too
..:: Mike



