CLK-Class (W209) 2003 on: CLK 270 CDI, CLK 200K, CLK 200 CGI, CLK 240, CLK 320, CLK 350, CLK 500, CLK 550 [Coupes & Cabriolets]

Bad Gas ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 07-24-2011, 10:05 AM
  #1  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
mis3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,200
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
2004 CLK320
Bad Gas ?

Apparently amongst my friends, there are 2 schools of thoughts on our car fuels.

Some believe that the gases from all service stations, major brands or smaller distributors, are the same. This includes a chemical engineering who works in a major brand. The only difference is the additives they add as final products. Sure enough I saw gas tankers from different brands (Shell, Esso, minor brands) coming out from the same refinery in east-end Montreal.

Some believe that the fuel from major brands are superior with higher standards. They only fuel up at Shell or Esso gas stations.

In Toronto, we have Husky gas stations who sell gas in a slightly lower price. Not sure if their gas is good or bad but in my CLK320, I cannot tell the difference.

Last edited by mis3; 07-24-2011 at 10:08 AM.
Old 07-24-2011, 12:08 PM
  #2  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
bheng's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: SF
Posts: 1,971
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
2003 CLK 320
isnt it just the final additive and as long as the fuel place you pump at isnt a run down POS, shouldnt the fuel filter take care of the rest?

i have been wanting to do a test on this. however i have no patience for it.
gotta do an oil change. fill up on non top tier gas, drive a long distance, say 400 mi. on the way back, do the same thing but with top tier gas. making sure that you are driving in the same speed etc.

anyways. i personally dont think it really matters but a couple of cents on the dollar per fill up comes up to an extra buck or two if you are looking at it on the money portion. i just go with whatever is most convenient for me.
Old 07-24-2011, 01:03 PM
  #3  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
mis3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,200
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
2004 CLK320
I am not concerned on the $1-2 saving on a full tank.

I am interested in the truth. I did see different branded gas tankers leaving the same refinery. For instance, I saw a Shell gas tanker and then a Olco gas tanker leaving the Ultramar refinery in Montreal.

I myself sometimes drive an extra KM to get to a "major" gas station.
Old 07-24-2011, 07:04 PM
  #4  
Member
 
C-A-T-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 98
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2014 911S & 2013 E92 M3 CP
I try to stick with Shell 93 V-Power

Last edited by C-A-T-S; 07-25-2011 at 09:49 AM.
Old 07-24-2011, 08:23 PM
  #5  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
bheng's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: SF
Posts: 1,971
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
2003 CLK 320
meh i think its all in the additives.
Old 07-25-2011, 04:59 AM
  #6  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
elijah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: EURO Style
Posts: 1,700
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Euro Cars Only
I use Shell V-Power whenever I fill up
Old 07-25-2011, 10:54 AM
  #7  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
kbahl21's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Syosset, NY
Posts: 1,253
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
CLK & GL
Originally Posted by elijah
I use Shell V-Power whenever I fill up
+1
Old 07-25-2011, 11:01 AM
  #8  
Out Of Control!!
 
dynomite05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Jerzy
Posts: 10,275
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
04 CLK 320 > CLK32K
+2
Old 07-25-2011, 11:28 AM
  #9  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
mis3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,200
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
2004 CLK320
I was told once that the independent service stations would get the bottom portion of the tank in the refinery.
If this is true, the gas would be more "dirty".
Old 07-25-2011, 02:26 PM
  #10  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
bheng's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: SF
Posts: 1,971
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
2003 CLK 320
^ that sounds about what would most likely happen. indy stations get the lower portion of the gas and the difference should be in the additives which is only to be the cleaning agents that they use. so is that the same as using chevron techron cleaner when you pump? cuz thats what they advertise when you pump.
Old 07-25-2011, 04:37 PM
  #11  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Mka77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Witness Protection Program
Posts: 1,314
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
06 CLK350 -SOLD! 2010 Cadillac SRX Premium Turbo
Who really knows. Found this passage on a local high volume retailer's site. QT. When asked which refiner they get their gas products from.

"Even retail outlets of major oil companies i.e Shell, Mobil and Exxon end up drawing their gasoline out of the same pipeline as everyone else."

Makes one wonder if they are really getting that Shell product.
Old 07-25-2011, 04:51 PM
  #12  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
mis3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,200
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
2004 CLK320
I have been fuelling up at the major service stations only; mainly Shell and Esso. Less and less at Esso now because they add ethanol to their gas. I am not sure if this applies to their premium grade.

The point is there is a Husky gas station right around the corner and the Shell station is about one KM away. For the peace of mind, I have been going to Shell for the past 2 years. Not sure if there is any valid reason to drive this extra KM, espeically both gases work in my car wihtout any noticable difference.

FYI. We don't have Shell 93 V-Power in Canada. Our Shell V-Power is 91.

Last edited by mis3; 07-25-2011 at 04:53 PM.
Old 07-26-2011, 01:50 PM
  #13  
Super Member
 
kostas86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 903
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
V8, Flat 6, V6, & Turbo flat 4
All I know is that everytime I fill up at a Shell or Mobil I see the best results so i just stick with those.
Old 07-27-2011, 03:10 AM
  #14  
Super Member
 
MB Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Chicago
Posts: 863
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Suzuki Burgman Executive
Shell, BP, Moobile are my top choices.
Old 07-27-2011, 10:54 AM
  #15  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
mis3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,200
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
2004 CLK320
Looks like we are all going for the "majors" but with no certainly that we know they are better.

Occasionally, I would use an indy when there is no other choice. Every time I did not fele any impact to my car. Makes me wonder.....
Old 07-27-2011, 02:18 PM
  #16  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
bheng's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: SF
Posts: 1,971
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
2003 CLK 320
lol goes with the peace of mind thing.
Old 07-29-2011, 11:01 AM
  #17  
Member
 
08clk350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1st choice - shell v-power 91 (no 93 in CA)
2nd choice - mobile 91

i dont fill up anything else. if it is emergency, i might fill with chevron w/ techron 91, but that is if i am desperate.
Old 07-29-2011, 12:20 PM
  #18  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
bheng's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: SF
Posts: 1,971
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
2003 CLK 320
haha damn chevron IF you're desperate? whats so bad about them?
Old 07-29-2011, 02:05 PM
  #19  
Member
 
08clk350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i prefer shell and mobile just cuz i been using them ever since i owned my first car (2001). i have a co-worker that has a super charged charger srt that costs him like 7 or 10 grand and the company that makes the super charger told him to use shell v-power only. that was their recommendation, not sure why, but i would assume it makes a difference? so long story short....i just go with shell or mobile.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 1 votes, 5.00 average.

Quick Reply: Bad Gas ?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:26 PM.