722.6 ATF
The ATF of 2004 CLK320 is supposed to last lifetime and against my SA advice, I asked the dealership to change the ATF on Feb-2009. At that time, they did use the correct ATF for my transmission.
Now that I drove this car for another 3 years (maybe 80k km), I would like to change the ATF again. I went to the dealership but they no longer stocked the specific ATF for 722.6. They said the ATF for 722.6 and 722.9 were inter-changable.
According to this forum. I should not use the ATF of 722.9 on a 722.6. I should only use ATF with part no 001-989-21-03-10. What should I do? Should I go ahead to let them change the ATF?
Last edited by mis3; Jan 14, 2012 at 03:45 PM.


My question is similar to the OP who started the thread.
My MB tech had a large cache of the MB labeled 722.6 fluid. he bought this on purpose because the day job dealership was having "issues" with the transitional 7 spd fluid.
When I had my fluid changed 2 years ago he insisted on using this original .6 fluid on the 5 speed following the complete 1x litre procedure, rather than the "interim" multi trans fluid.
I trust him, since he is conscientious, so if he stocks the new fluid .14 I should use this if no longer has the old stock? What happens if he has both, and I have the 5 speed? Which is preferred?
If not MB branded . 14 fluids which brands do you like, and how does onerecognize them?
Btw if I put < 5k miles on the car per year what is the yearly interval for the .6 transmission fluid and filter change, as you might do to your ride?
Last edited by grane; Jan 16, 2012 at 10:20 AM.
More so since I want to do only the partial flush. It is not a good idea to mix both fluids in the transmission. The dealership did it last time using 722.6 ATF with good results.
The question is since the dealerships no longer stock this fluid, where do I get it locally in Toronto?

Remember that the 722.9 is a development of the 722.6 with a Ravigneaux gearset to achieve the extra ratios.
There has never been a fluid issue in all the generational changes from 236.1 to 236.14. Early 722.9 transmissions had some TCU issues, speed sensor/conductor plate issues, fluid level issues hence the new spill tube height & pan redesign etc. None related to fluid. It has been a steady progression as Benz has strived for longer fluid life without transmission performance change.
The old & new fluids are designed to be miscible & fungible. However the new fluid uses better friction modifiers so to enjoy the full benefit a complete change is sensible.
There is a HUGE amount of crap spoken on the internet & forums about this issue from - changing your fluid could lead to transmission failure, leave the old fluid in it, to the old fluid is better than the new. What utter bollocks. Time & development moves on and the oil industry has better components available to it than when the earlier generation fluids were developed. What disgusts me is how often ignorant MB Techs that are nothing more than parts changers in many cases pass this misinformation around. Choose carefully who you listen to.
If you run low mileage as I tend to then change fluid every 5 years if you want to adopt a belt & bracers approach. I changed mine at 7 years on my last car & all was absolutely fine.
Please note that Benz changed the 722.6 recommendation in 2008. This is not new! The 722.6 transmission is still used in some diesel models although being phased out. It is filled with 236.14 fluid ex factory.
Approved fluids as of now.
Last edited by Glyn M Ruck; Jan 15, 2012 at 10:35 AM.

Ryder fleet products have by far the best deal on this product by Shell at under US$ 6 per quart. Most dealers are charging over $20/quart. The Shell product is fully approved. Many use Fuchs Titan 4134 as well.
See description. It is Shell product in a Shell container - Pennzoil is owned by Shell. Many have confirmed correct product in Shell packaging on receipt.
http://www.ryderfleetproducts.com/ry...oductDetail.do
Trending Topics
How about partial flush? This would mean that the 2 fluids will mix inside the transmission. Is this OK or should I look for the 236.10 fluid?
The Best of Mercedes & AMG

If you do the half drain, drain hot & leave it draining for as long as possible.
If the present fluid does not look good then do the full flush which takes 14 quarts otherwise you are just putting crap in the ice cream.
I could curse Benz for removing the TC drain plug in 1999. Thank god it's back.

If it is slightly darkened but clear & bright it is OK & normal.
On my C240 with a 722.6 we changed the fluid - half change method - at 7 years 60K Km's. The fluid that came out looked OK. Had I kept the car it was my plan to do another half change 30K Km's later.
On the different but related topic, how does one damage the transmission? I know that towing can cause stress or overheat for a transmission.
I do not haul anything with my car. is there any day-to-day driving habits that we should avoid to preserve the transmission?

The 722.6 is an extremely robust transmission. The only failure mode seen from time to time is usually the first to second gear one way clutch at extremely high mileage in Taxi service from just too many high torque changes.
Properly serviced the 722.6 will do a million kilometres. I know of a number in Asia that have done just that & we have an E240 at the office in Cape Town that is heading for 700,000Km with no major repairs. Transmission is still fine. The car does taxi service to & from our airport.
So drive sensibly, service correctly & watch the electrohydraulic bushing where the TCU plugs into the front RHS diagonal of the transmission for leaks & all will be well. O rings sometimes fail on that plug bushing. $8 replacement part so no big deal.
I understand that at any gear, I can shift to neutral. On the other hnad, it is risky to shift to gear when driving in neutral.
Last edited by mis3; Jan 16, 2012 at 11:23 AM.

I did not know that this will hurt the transmission !!!


The safety issues are obvious.
Valvoline Link:http://www.valvoline.com/pdf/maxlife_atf.pdf

Benz spends a fortune on it's approval process to protect it's product & it's customers. The oil industry likewise spends a lot of money meeting Benz specifications. There is a very good reason that so few fluids are approved.
There is also a good reason that the Benz fluid costs more. It uses better components in the blend. That does not mean that you have to pay $20+ per quart but Shell & Fuchs pricing is reasonable.
With a transmission rebuild costing upward of $8000 today to do it properly - do not mess with non approved fluids!
Last edited by Glyn M Ruck; Jan 20, 2012 at 06:21 AM.
Benz spends a fortune on it's approval process to protect it's product & it's customers. The oil industry likewise spends a lot of money meeting Benz specifications. There is a very good reason that so few fluids are approved.
There is also a good reason that the Benz fluid costs more. It uses better components in the blend. That does not mean that you have to pay $20+ per quart but Shell & Fuchs pricing is reasonable.
With a transmission rebuild costing upward of $8000 today to do it properly - do not mess with non approved fluids!

Benz & the oil industry spend a fortune on fluid development & some backyard grease monkey of an Indy knows better. I think not.
Peace!
Benz & the oil industry spend a fortune on fluid development & some backyard grease monkey of an Indy knows better. I think not.
Peace!
Last edited by jbenz99; Jan 20, 2012 at 05:48 PM.

Seems you don't keep your cars very long but if you make a properly recorded 39K mile fluid change please send the used oil sample to Blackstone & post the analysis result. Then we can discuss clutch pack wear rates etc.
Seems you don't keep your cars very long but if you make a properly recorded 39K mile fluid change please send the used oil sample to Blackstone & post the analysis result. Then we can discuss clutch pack wear rates etc.
Last edited by jbenz99; Jan 20, 2012 at 06:27 PM.


