CLK500 (5 speed) vs C43
It would seem a 5.0L CLK500 5 speed should be able to beat a C43.
Anyone have any experience? i never drop a CLK500 before but I drove a C43 and thought it was amazing already!
It would seem a 5.0L CLK500 5 speed should be able to beat a C43.
Anyone have any experience? i never drop a CLK500 before but I drove a C43 and thought it was amazing already!

If you're looking for performance, then I doubt these cars are what you're looking for. By today's standards they are slooooow... A 2012 v6 mustang will outrun these cars, and even a v6 accord will give them a run for its money.
If you're looking for performance, then I doubt these cars are what you're looking for. By today's standards they are slooooow... A 2012 v6 mustang will outrun these cars, and even a v6 accord will give them a run for its money.
Lots of bold statements in the comments above.
The CLK500 (or even the C43, for that matter) are not "slooooow" at all even by 2012 standards. The C43 will hold its own against a GTI, Civic Si, or even a MS3. The CLK500 does upper 13s in the 1/4 so it's still pretty beastly even if an 8 year newer V6 Mustang can run with it.
As for being able to find C63s "cheap" these days? Even four year old C63s out of warranty are asking above $45K so i dont know what you are talking about there lol.
Trending Topics
I paid around 40k for my 320 november 2009. So yeah 45k is pretty cheap to me.
Useless comment.....
Last edited by mikata; Jun 13, 2012 at 05:44 PM.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Couldnt agree more, fast/slow, expensive/cheap, beautiful/face like a torn bun... all relative terms.
$45k for a C63 is a steal here in Sweden.
As I said, I paid 40k for my 320 and that's cheap for a low mile CLK in 2009.
New volvos go for way more than 40k here.
This is my opinion and you have yours, I don't see what the problem is?
1-2 year old SAAB's cost more here than your 550 in US

Even though SAAB is in bankruptcy and was just bought by another company this week their affiliated company for parts is still going strong.
$45k for a C63 is a steal here in Sweden.
As I said, I paid 40k for my 320 and that's cheap for a low mile CLK in 2009.
New volvos go for way more than 40k here.
This is my opinion and you have yours, I don't see what the problem is?
It's just that over here it's a pretty unanimous opinion that $50K for a used car is not cheap.
That's crazy what used Saabs and Volvos go for in Sweden.
i lived all over the world...and this is the same everywhere...
you are a NY'er...let the SWEDE go nutz over the cheap $45k C63
NY'ers always take the HIGH ROAD
too bad for you your Swedey govt taxes your like crazy! lol



