CLK-Class (W209) 2003 on: CLK 270 CDI, CLK 200K, CLK 200 CGI, CLK 240, CLK 320, CLK 350, CLK 500, CLK 550 [Coupes & Cabriolets]

anyone like the older tails better? Also, need mudflaps

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Apr 12, 2013 | 04:55 AM
  #1  
California's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 319
Likes: 5
From: SoCal
C350 '12
anyone like the older tails better? Also, need mudflaps

Do you guys think it's weird that I think I like the original 209 tail lights better than the newer ones after 05?

Are the original tails LED? (Are the later ones LED, mine seem to be... stock 06)

I think I'm interested in buying new old style tails.

Mine are perfect, don't get me wrong, but I think the older style makes the back look less "bulbous" and more Mercedes-like.

I've seen some Camry's with tails that look like the later CLK tails... don't like it.

Also I need mudflaps. White paint. Do any of you guys have them?
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2013 | 08:49 AM
  #2  
Yidney's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 2,109
Likes: 112
2008 CLK550 Cab
Like many things, whether people like something or not is often driven by which is newer and percieved to be more "in style." If nobody had ever seen a W209, and were just asked which tailights they like better with the lights just sitting by themselves on a table, I'm sure a higher percentage would pick the older ones than prefer them now knowing they are older. If carbon fiber interior trim had been around for 50 years, and suddenly somebody got the idea to use wood, all the forums would be about replacing carbon with wood instead of the other way around. It's a little disconcerting sometimes to realize how much what we think we decide ourlseves we like is really driven by a desire to keep up with everybody else. As for me, if I did my table test, I think I might pick the older lights. They are more dramatic with the contrast.
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2013 | 12:23 PM
  #3  
gaazmon's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,082
Likes: 59
From: Los Angeles
2009 SL550 Roadster Diamond White, 2008 CLK550 Coupe Obsidian Black
Originally Posted by California
I think the older style makes the back look less "bulbous" and more Mercedes-like.

I've seen some Camry's with tails that look like the later CLK tails... don't like it.
+1
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2013 | 12:41 PM
  #4  
waveterrorist's Avatar
Super Member
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 576
Likes: 28
From: chicago
Firemist O5 CLK55 Cab Silver 05 CLK55 Coupe Tanzanite 06 CLK500 Coupe
Not me, not for a second...Totally dated imho
I am not driving somebody's grandfather's ride.
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2013 | 12:54 PM
  #5  
CLK550 $wagger's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
White CLK550
i did like the older ones better for a while up until I saw them in person...
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2013 | 09:06 PM
  #6  
California's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 319
Likes: 5
From: SoCal
C350 '12
Originally Posted by Yidney
Like many things, whether people like something or not is often driven by which is newer and percieved to be more "in style." If nobody had ever seen a W209, and were just asked which tailights they like better with the lights just sitting by themselves on a table, I'm sure a higher percentage would pick the older ones than prefer them now knowing they are older. If carbon fiber interior trim had been around for 50 years, and suddenly somebody got the idea to use wood, all the forums would be about replacing carbon with wood instead of the other way around. It's a little disconcerting sometimes to realize how much what we think we decide ourlseves we like is really driven by a desire to keep up with everybody else. As for me, if I did my table test, I think I might pick the older lights. They are more dramatic with the contrast.
Yes, this is what I mean, their contrast is more dramatic...
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2013 | 09:08 PM
  #7  
California's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 319
Likes: 5
From: SoCal
C350 '12
Originally Posted by gaazmon
+1
If I could find a new set, I think I'd go for it. Too bad my own tails are nearly new looking.



Has anyone seen CLK mudflaps?

I need them because mud/dirt kicks up on my white paint.

Thanks guys.

P.S. Who likes the gray tail lights that I think DEPO makes? I could see them looking good on certain color CLKs. But not mine.
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2013 | 09:09 PM
  #8  
California's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 319
Likes: 5
From: SoCal
C350 '12
Originally Posted by CLK550 $wagger
i did like the older ones better for a while up until I saw them in person...
I saw them in person on a taupe silver CLK 320 convertible and i almost walked over to touch them. Thought they looked great. There is an indentation on the white part which transverses the around the side of the taillight, nice touch.
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2013 | 11:33 AM
  #9  
lowpost's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,247
Likes: 31
From: Oakland
2018 E43 | 2017 GLS450 | 2004 CLK 500
I like the original better - why I never changed them. The new ones actually look more dated because they're plain, looks like no design effort went into them. If someone made the originals in led i'd be all over them.
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2013 | 04:37 PM
  #10  
Pexi's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 16
Likes: 1
2004 CLK 500
There's no class at all in the new ones. Old style with led technology would be ideal.
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2013 | 05:13 PM
  #11  
togaclk55's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 1,456
Likes: 1
From: Bay Area, CA
CLK55
I like the new ones better
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2013 | 05:47 PM
  #12  
user 823908234's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 285
Likes: 2
From: \
/
I switched old to new aftermarket because 1) I like the LEDs and 2) I got 'em at a real good price from a member. Actually I'm neutral on style. Of course now that it's been brought up again, I'll wonder if people think my butt looks big in these lights.
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2013 | 10:45 PM
  #13  
Rudeney's Avatar
MBworld Guru
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 10,782
Likes: 1,011
NO LONGER ACTIVE
Hey Jerry, it's not the lights...
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2013 | 01:37 AM
  #14  
California's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 319
Likes: 5
From: SoCal
C350 '12
Originally Posted by lowpost
I like the original better - why I never changed them. The new ones actually look more dated because they're plain, looks like no design effort went into them. If someone made the originals in led i'd be all over them.
I wonder if you could take the plastic face off an old style pair of tail lights and apply them to a new style LED taillight? How do the inner LEDs work I wonder?
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2013 | 01:52 PM
  #15  
Rudeney's Avatar
MBworld Guru
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 10,782
Likes: 1,011
NO LONGER ACTIVE
Nope - the bulb pattern is different. In fact, to install the new style lights in an older model requires a small modification to the cars sheet metal. BTW, the new style lights do not use LEDs - they have standard bulbs. LED taillights are aftermarket parts.
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2013 | 02:20 PM
  #16  
user 823908234's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 285
Likes: 2
From: \
/
Originally Posted by Rudeney
Hey Jerry, it's not the lights...
How Rude! Couldn't be the Spandex...
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2013 | 06:51 PM
  #17  
California's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 319
Likes: 5
From: SoCal
C350 '12
Originally Posted by Rudeney
Hey Jerry, it's not the lights...
LOL.

Okay I had some tinting left over from my C230. I'm scared the tail lights look like Camry's. Say Rodney, so if these are OEM lights, they are not LED? Only aftermarket are true LED? Interesting if true.
Attached Thumbnails anyone like the older tails better?  Also, need mudflaps-img_2360.jpg  
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2013 | 07:10 PM
  #18  
California's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 319
Likes: 5
From: SoCal
C350 '12
Originally Posted by lowpost
I like the original better - why I never changed them. The new ones actually look more dated because they're plain, looks like no design effort went into them. If someone made the originals in led i'd be all over them.
Low, that is a beaut of a car. I'd go out with a car like that, I mean guy.

My sister did some work for 3M paints and they told her that metalic paints like silver on cars always age faster because they have reflective particles in the paint that catch sunlight and reflect back upon themselves inside the molecular structure of the paint layer itself, yet Lowpost's car looks like it is showroom new. Must take care of it... Also like the wheels.

Last edited by California; Apr 14, 2013 at 07:15 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2013 | 09:57 PM
  #19  
Rudeney's Avatar
MBworld Guru
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 10,782
Likes: 1,011
NO LONGER ACTIVE
Mine are the new style and are not LED. I checked EPC, and the CLK63 and CLK63BS both use the exact same part as my car. The only one's I've seen with LEDs are on eBay, like this:

http://www.ebay.com/itm/DEPO-03-09-MERCEDES-W209-CLK-RED-CLEAR-LED-TAIL-BUMPER-SIDE-MARKER-LIGHT-AMG-/151027171220?pt=Motors_Car_Truck_Parts_Accessories&hash=item2329ebbf94&vxp=mtr

As for car colors, I think red seems to be the worst for fading. I can say that the finish on our MY2002 Desert Silver (i.e. champagne) C240 has held up amazingly well - that is, the panels that haven't been repainted, which now is the trunk lid, roof, and the driver's door.
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2013 | 12:00 AM
  #20  
lowpost's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,247
Likes: 31
From: Oakland
2018 E43 | 2017 GLS450 | 2004 CLK 500
Originally Posted by California
Low, that is a beaut of a car. I'd go out with a car like that, I mean guy.

My sister did some work for 3M paints and they told her that metalic paints like silver on cars always age faster because they have reflective particles in the paint that catch sunlight and reflect back upon themselves inside the molecular structure of the paint layer itself, yet Lowpost's car looks like it is showroom new. Must take care of it... Also like the wheels.
Thanks - Since I've had this car I haven't done anything special - wash it every 2 weeks, full detail every spring. Easy. Photoshop and a full sun on silver paint always helps!
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2013 | 05:45 AM
  #21  
Glyn M Ruck's Avatar
Super Moderator
MBWorld Ambassador

 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 19,942
Likes: 191
From: Llandudno, Cape Town, South Africa
late 2009 CLK 350 Coupe Elegance, '65 Jaguar S Type wires
Many like the old tails. A matter of personal taste.

Your dealer can order you a genuine set of mud flaps for the W209. They come as a front set & a back set. They fit robustly & perfectly. They are also very discreet. I have them on my car & they work perfectly & look good. Had them fitted before taking delivery to prevent stone chipping of the paintwork.
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2013 | 05:55 PM
  #22  
M-bENZ's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 7,136
Likes: 5
Corrolla
I've never seen any mud flaps on any clk before ...mind to post up some pics of ur car Glynn?
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2013 | 06:04 PM
  #23  
Glyn M Ruck's Avatar
Super Moderator
MBWorld Ambassador

 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 19,942
Likes: 191
From: Llandudno, Cape Town, South Africa
late 2009 CLK 350 Coupe Elegance, '65 Jaguar S Type wires
I'll take a pic tomorrow after my niece's kids christening.
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2013 | 06:38 PM
  #24  
eddieo45's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,119
Likes: 222
From: Milton/Westport, MA USA
me: 2015 SL400 & 2015 ML400; wife: 2022 GLC Coupe; daughter: 2017 GLC SUV
Congrats on the christening you great-grand-uncle!
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2013 | 06:53 PM
  #25  
Glyn M Ruck's Avatar
Super Moderator
MBWorld Ambassador

 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 19,942
Likes: 191
From: Llandudno, Cape Town, South Africa
late 2009 CLK 350 Coupe Elegance, '65 Jaguar S Type wires
Thanks Eddie!
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:37 PM.