CLK 55 AMG trackday car


btw, i read the piece on jeff and his c class, he's a good driver,what can i say?
The CLK will make a great track car with some work. With the minor weight I have removed my car now weighs less than a E46 M3. My C43 weighs about 3200 lbs now while the M3 weighs about 3450lbs from what I read on the Internet.
A LSD differential is a real aid and I would say is a must. Also the uprated springs and swaybars make the car feel like it weighs 1000 lbs less than it does.
The SSR wheels are only 15.5 lbs each and I run 17"x9.5" both front and rear with 255/40/17 in front and 275/40/17 in the rear.
The Penske shocks and eibach springs really make a hugh change and upgrade. I have almost no roll through the corners and I do not really do much if any hard driving in the canyons. I might rip around a little, but the difference in speed between driving at the track and on a public road is about 100% difference. The fastest pace you can safely run on the road is about the speed I run to warm up the tires at the track.
As far as acceleration my C43 will pull on a E39 M3 everywhere and is slightly faster than a current E46 M3, with better pull off the corners.
In summary if you spend the time and get the chassis sorted out properly a CLK55 will be a very fast and capable track car that wears the tires out evenly across the tread width and will just shock others you will share the track with. Most people just can't believe it was a Mercedes that passed them and drove off. Also at the track the Auto trans is not an issue at all. You manually put it in the gear you want and it will stay there even as the engine hits the rev limiter.
Go For it.
Jeff
Last edited by speedybenz; Dec 9, 2005 at 01:09 AM.
say?
You said the M3 is NOT a SPORT CAR !!! Why don't you just name one cars magazines that said the M3 is not a sport car. All I asked is JUST ONE !!! And name another cars magazine that said the CLK 55 is a sport car. Btw, All the cars magazine is that compared the M3 and Clk 55....the CLK 55 lost to the M3 in all the performances catagories !!! All test were done by one driver (the same driver). Just because someone said they passed others people car on the track, it does not alway mean, their car is faster then others. He might just be a better driver then others !!! Sh#$$t.....i own a Clk 430 with suspension mods and it handling is NOT even close to the stock BMW 3 series !!!!
Per the 2005 BMW M3 Press Kit:
On page 3, in the “History of the M3” section of the press kit, BMW refers to the M3 as a “2-door sedan”. Their words, not mine. The same press kit, on page 21, it says “The Coupe is of the same basic construction as the 3 Series Sedan. . . “ That's an exact quote.
Do yourself a favor and don't ask for magazine quotes. I’m about the last person you want to start diggin up quotes from car magazines. I can get a writer, who has an article published in the current issue of a "car magazine", to state it for you in plain English, on this forum. I'm telling you in advance, you won't care for the quote.
ill be the 1st to say that a m3 is faster and more enjoyable to drive than any clk(not dtm). neither the clk or m3 are sports cars, sorry to break it to u. a clk55 is faster than a m3 in a straight line, thats it, it doesnt pull better skidpad or slalom times, i agree. both cars are too heavy to be real sports cars, the old m3 was a real sports car (e30). the m3 is more sporty and performance oriented than any clk (not dtm), i said that in the 1st place. believe me i know how much driver skill matters, i kill much faster cars in teh corners on a weekly basis (i live in beverly hills, we have lots of people w/ very fast cars but no idea of how to drive them). my 528i handled better than my clk.
I can tell you that compared to my Escalade, the CLK55 is a world class sports car....
In ANY event, it is certainly a sports sedan, as is the M3, so quit arguing if it is or is not a "sports car". You may continue to argue until your fingers fall of as to which one is preferable TO YOU, but I already know that answer, I vote with my wallet......But understand there is a quite often dramatic difference between your opinion and someone elses. And we are now talking about opinion, nothing more...
AMG_55 did you read Speedy Benz's last reply to your comments?
Like I said his car clocks E46 E36 M3's on the track and would certainly annihilate your CLK55 regardless of how much Mario Andretti you feel you have in your soul.
Just be careful on them damn canyons.You're better off testing your skills on the track so that you won't take a 10,000 ft rocky plunge! Be careful!!
Last edited by ProjectC55; Dec 9, 2005 at 10:11 AM.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
This setup is so far advanced from a stock AMG setup. It would be like comparing a SUV to Corvette. So I can understand why you will have a hard time coming to grips with the difference between a stock CLK 55 and a BMW with a set of stock shocks or Bilstein PS9? But the difference is there and I can take full advantage of it. I am equally sure that a BMW setup with Penske shocks or Moton's could/would handle as well also. It is just not many have taken the time to set thier car up to have really good camber control and keep the tires flat to the pavement.
Just my two cents.
Jeff
It has been great to hear everyone`s comments.
Cheers, Jon
It has been great to hear everyone`s comments.
Cheers, Jon
If there is a CLK DTM owner that actually drives one, It would be great to hear some feedback.
Car was built from the ground up as a race car by Mercedes' DTM race shop. They did use a gutted CLK in the build. No one, apart from a race shop, is going to be able to build a CLK DTM clone.
But that shouldn't discourage anyone from doing-up a track car.....
FYI a good source for any tuning/handling mods on mercedes would be mercedes performance (01923 897007) they should be able to give you a good idea about whats available
There are a few cars for sale in the UK, probably bought as investments, and with delivery miles. Temptation or what?
I did see that there was one used on the Gumball or 3000 Rally or something like that, might have done quite well. Does anyone know the chap and how the car held up?
CLK DTM is perfect mechanically, on the track, on the road. Still has the 5-speed but Shifts are lightning quick. I think that they reprogrammed or did something different to the transmisssion, ESP, and ASR on this car as they are all different than on 'regular' AMG cars. Maybe it just seems taht way because the rest of this car is so different, but I don't think so, because the difference is too great.
You have to realize that the back seats have been stripped-out and there is cross-bracing behind the front seats, it has racing buckets in it, the door panels are bare CF, etc -- the thing is a stripped-down trackcar. But the interior is still very nice, very MBZ.
If you have the money you should seriously consider buying one -- and Britain is one of the best places to find one currently. And of course if you were to look at one you would have to be able to test drive it for your evaluation, say at Silverstone(!)
They really did a nice job on this car -- not as exotic or *****-to-the-wall as the CLK GTR, but definately awesome, spectacular, and quite smooth and liveable at the same time. It is a very nicely done car.
I haven't seen or driven one of the newer CLK DTM Cab's yet, but they have rear seating! Trackday for four, anyone?
Last edited by ClayJ; Dec 29, 2005 at 09:53 AM.









