CLK55 AMG, CLK63 AMG (W208, W209) 2000 - 2010 (Two Generations)

what handles better?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 01-25-2008, 12:26 AM
  #1  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Jeff E39's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
what handles better?

Since I really don't know Benz's which car is the better performer and has better handling and stability?

2005 C55 or 2004 CLK55

thx
Old 01-25-2008, 02:15 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
CZ55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Miami
Posts: 453
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
M156
nurburgring 8:22 - 147.749 km/h - Mercedes-Benz C55 (sport auto07/2004)

nurburgring 8:29 - 145.697 km/h - Mercedes Benz CLK 55 AMG, 347 PS/1593 kg (sport auto 05/00)
Old 01-25-2008, 02:35 AM
  #3  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Jeff E39's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by C.Z. 55
nurburgring 8:22 - 147.749 km/h - Mercedes-Benz C55 (sport auto07/2004)

nurburgring 8:29 - 145.697 km/h - Mercedes Benz CLK 55 AMG, 347 PS/1593 kg (sport auto 05/00)
lol thx
Old 01-25-2008, 02:26 PM
  #4  
Super Member
 
AMGOODNESS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Sparks, NV
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
03 CLK 55 AMG, IMCO muffler/Magnaflow tips, KW V1 coilovers, 19" Petrol Metrix Wheels
the time difference could have been made up in the straightaway. the C55 has much more power. i would be willing to be that the CLK55 is the better handler.
Old 01-25-2008, 02:47 PM
  #5  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
OPALW208's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The Bay
Posts: 1,195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SL55, C63
Originally Posted by AMGOODNESS
the time difference could have been made up in the straightaway. the C55 has much more power. i would be willing to be that the CLK55 is the better handler.
i thought the 05' C55 and the 04' CLK55 had the same engine. How could the C55 have "much more power" ????????

i calculated the weight/HP ratio for the C55 and came up with 9.71:1, whereas the CLK55's was 10.04:1.

So, because the C55 is a lighter car, that is why it is faster on the track by a slim margin......NOT because it has "much more power."

Last edited by OPALW208; 01-25-2008 at 02:54 PM.
Old 01-25-2008, 04:53 PM
  #6  
Super Member
 
AMGOODNESS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Sparks, NV
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
03 CLK 55 AMG, IMCO muffler/Magnaflow tips, KW V1 coilovers, 19" Petrol Metrix Wheels
calm down bro'. i thought the c55 amg had the supercharger. it is in fact the cl55 amg. i missed a letter so shoot me.....

Last edited by AMGOODNESS; 01-25-2008 at 05:06 PM.
Old 01-25-2008, 05:55 PM
  #7  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Chappy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Hotlanta
Posts: 9,731
Received 62 Likes on 53 Posts
AMG
Hi guys.....just popped in to make sure you realize that the Ring lap time quoted for the CLK is for the W208 not the W209.
Old 01-25-2008, 11:59 PM
  #8  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Stiggs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 7,892
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
2003 CLK55
Originally Posted by AMGOODNESS
calm down bro'. i thought the c55 amg had the supercharger. it is in fact the cl55 amg. i missed a letter so shoot me.....
*bang*
Old 01-25-2008, 11:59 PM
  #9  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Stiggs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 7,892
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
2003 CLK55
Originally Posted by Chappy
Hi guys.....just popped in to make sure you realize that the Ring lap time quoted for the CLK is for the W208 not the W209.
What's the time for the W209?
Old 01-26-2008, 04:58 AM
  #10  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
OPALW208's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The Bay
Posts: 1,195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SL55, C63
Originally Posted by AMGOODNESS
calm down bro'. i thought the c55 amg had the supercharger. it is in fact the cl55 amg. i missed a letter so shoot me.....

even so, it doesn't make sense that a CLS55 would only beat a W208 or W209CLK55 by 7 seconds.

no need to shoot anyone.

Last edited by OPALW208; 01-26-2008 at 05:02 AM.
Old 01-26-2008, 09:27 AM
  #11  
Super Member
 
Jaki's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 659
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
E55 AMG + Mustang GT
Originally Posted by Chappy
Hi guys.....just popped in to make sure you realize that the Ring lap time quoted for the CLK is for the W208 not the W209.
+1

Jeff E39, which CLK are you looking for? The W208 or W209?
Old 01-26-2008, 02:15 PM
  #12  
spr
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
spr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,598
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C55 is lighter everything else is about the same, dunno about weight distribution but I remember reading that the c55's is better than the slk55's.
Old 01-26-2008, 02:44 PM
  #13  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Jeff E39's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Jaki
+1

Jeff E39, which CLK are you looking for? The W208 or W209?
w209
i personally think the c55 is the better performer but the clk is better looking and has more then enough performance
Old 01-27-2008, 01:48 AM
  #14  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Improviz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,679
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CLS55 AMG
I would suspect...

....that if we could get access to temp data for those two cars' runs, we would see that the C55 ran under much better track conditions. The two cars' setups are quite similar, and I would not think that with the same driver, on the same track, under the same conditions, there would be such a gap.

One used to be able to look up that info at track-challenge.com or whatever, but it seems to be shut down.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: what handles better?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:42 AM.