CLK55 AMG, CLK63 AMG (W208, W209) 2000 - 2010 (Two Generations)

W208 guys- For anyone that has driven both a 55 and a 430

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 09-24-2008, 05:00 PM
  #1  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
The Jury's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: TN
Posts: 527
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
2002 c240
W208 guys- For anyone that has driven both a 55 and a 430

I've been looking around at the 55 for a while now, just deciding when the right one is for me (currently in a 430). I'm not a paper racer, but I've seen consistent numbers enough to rely on them and I have to ask when I do find my 55......... am I going to notice a full second worth of difference? I know it'll be punchier, but a full second is a LOT of difference... more than just in the seat of your pants. A second is huge.

1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK430 6.1 14.5
2001 Mercedes-Benz CLK55 AMG 5.0 13.6

http://www.albeedigital.com/supercou...0-60times.html

I'm having a hard time seeing where a full second can be gained in what seems to be not exactly a huge HP boost. So, I figured I'd ask right where someone would know....... the owners. Anyone that has driven both will be able to honestly answer this question.

Hell, either way they are both faster than a Ferrari Testarossa.

1989 Ferrari Testarossa 6.2 14.2
http://www.albeedigital.com/supercou...0-60times.html

Na, but seriously.... with just this small amount of HP added, the 55 really pulls a full second harder? God that is just absolutely huge. I don't think people realize what it takes to move the same car 1 full second faster.
Old 09-24-2008, 06:17 PM
  #2  
Super Member
 
cindyclk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: North of Boston
Posts: 929
Received 37 Likes on 34 Posts
I had a 430 and could not believe the performance difference of the 55 when I got it. Not only is it quicker 0-60, it just keeps on pulling (faster than I would ever want to go). It is worth every cent to go to the amg!
Old 09-24-2008, 07:06 PM
  #3  
Out Of Control!!
 
blackbenzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 13,487
Received 94 Likes on 77 Posts
haters crazy
Yea its a second faster. I own both
Old 09-24-2008, 07:53 PM
  #4  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Jons95c36amg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Desert
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
02 CLK 55 AMG,09 C63 loaded with P30
I used to have a 03 350z which ran a 13.8@101mph. Now the Clk55 is like night and day. Especially the torque!
Old 09-24-2008, 08:21 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
BlackOnBlackCLK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Philadelphia area
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2001 clk55 AMG
i had a 2001 430 and now i have a 2001 55 and believe me its way faster than the 430. the 55 feels like a different car
Old 09-24-2008, 09:32 PM
  #6  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
da_guitarist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 1,833
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Current: AMG GT-C. Sold: 01 CLK55, 00 ML55, 01 ML55, 06 E55
had both, HUGE difference
Old 09-24-2008, 11:45 PM
  #7  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Improviz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,679
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CLS55 AMG
Drove both, not even a contest in terms of acceleration...the CLK430 is definitely no slouch, but the CLK55 is just a BEAST by comparison. Plus, it has lots of goodies, much nicer package.

Just make sure you get an extended warranty if possible on either of them, or at the very least have it thoroughly checked out prior to purchase.
Old 09-25-2008, 02:27 AM
  #8  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
MarcusF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: SCV SoCal
Posts: 3,784
Received 77 Likes on 61 Posts
2002 CLK430
I've driven both. The 55 pulls away like the 430's the emergency brake on. Like the 430's running on 4 flats. Like the 430 is going uphill and the 55 is going down.

If a 55 launched in winter mode, and got a door length lead, before I could think "I'm in front", I'd be looking at tail lights - AND I CHEAT!!

OK, maybe I'm exaggerating a little, but not by much. And if it's Blackbenzz's car forget about that one second stuff. He'll spot a 430 two car lengths and be past it before the 430's traction control light goes off.
Old 09-25-2008, 04:46 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Boosted9603's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Canby, OR
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
CLK55 AMG
I agree with everyone else! I had a 430 and then sold it and got a 55. The 55 is much better in terms of hp and tq.
Old 09-25-2008, 05:46 PM
  #10  
Out Of Control!!
 
blackbenzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 13,487
Received 94 Likes on 77 Posts
haters crazy
Originally Posted by MarcusF
I've driven both. The 55 pulls away like the 430's the emergency brake on. Like the 430's running on 4 flats. Like the 430 is going uphill and the 55 is going down.

If a 55 launched in winter mode, and got a door length lead, before I could think "I'm in front", I'd be looking at tail lights - AND I CHEAT!!

OK, maybe I'm exaggerating a little, but not by much. And if it's Blackbenzz's car forget about that one second stuff. He'll spot a 430 two car lengths and be past it before the 430's traction control light goes off.
Old 09-26-2008, 11:53 AM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
clk22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Beantown
Posts: 450
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2003 clk55
i had a 430 and wanted a 208amg but i found a great deal on a 209 AMG Its night and day between the 430 and 55.....
Old 09-27-2008, 11:14 PM
  #12  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Stiggs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 7,892
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
2003 CLK55
Originally Posted by The Jury

I'm having a hard time seeing where a full second can be gained in what seems to be not exactly a huge HP boost. So, I figured I'd ask right where someone would know....... the owners. Anyone that has driven both will be able to honestly answer this question.


Na, but seriously.... with just this small amount of HP added, the 55 really pulls a full second harder? God that is just absolutely huge. I don't think people realize what it takes to move the same car 1 full second faster.

You're focusing on just HP.....don't forget the torque!

and yes....the 55 is a beast.
Old 09-28-2008, 12:42 PM
  #13  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
The Jury's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: TN
Posts: 527
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
2002 c240
Good stuff, makes me want to just buy the next one I see. I've been holding out for the right one though. I'm partial to my car, I like it the way it is. The silver/black is the way to go for me. I won't even notice a difference looking out in the driveway since they both have the AMG appearance package and just a slight thickness in wheel spokes. Gotta find the right service records and tie it into the right price, then I'll be set.

So, anyone race any Testarossa's lately? (LOL). Looking forward to my purchase.
Old 09-29-2008, 12:55 PM
  #14  
Super Member
 
AMGOODNESS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Sparks, NV
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
03 CLK 55 AMG, IMCO muffler/Magnaflow tips, KW V1 coilovers, 19" Petrol Metrix Wheels
what part of TN are you in? i grew up in Memphis.
Old 10-01-2008, 04:20 PM
  #15  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
OPALW208's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The Bay
Posts: 1,195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SL55, C63
i owned a 430 before I purchased the 55. Can't put the 2 cars in the same sentence when it comes to performace. They are 2 completely different animals.

The 55 right now is worth every penny, especially when some people are selling theirs in the $12K-$15K price range =)
Old 10-01-2008, 05:42 PM
  #16  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
The Jury's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: TN
Posts: 527
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
2002 c240
Originally Posted by AMGOODNESS
what part of TN are you in? i grew up in Memphis.
Chattanooga
Old 10-01-2008, 05:45 PM
  #17  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
The Jury's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: TN
Posts: 527
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
2002 c240
Originally Posted by OPALW208
i owned a 430 before I purchased the 55. Can't put the 2 cars in the same sentence when it comes to performace. They are 2 completely different animals.

The 55 right now is worth every penny, especially when some people are selling theirs in the $12K-$15K price range =)
Well I need to find one that is identical to my 430 first of all. I love my 430. It's a 99 and look at the interior CLICK ME

I'm picky. When I find one like that, silver exterior, all service records, and the right price, I'm in
Old 10-20-2008, 03:19 PM
  #18  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Chappy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Hotlanta
Posts: 9,731
Received 62 Likes on 53 Posts
AMG
Come to ATL and I'll give you a ride...


Originally Posted by The Jury
I've been looking around at the 55 for a while now, just deciding when the right one is for me (currently in a 430). I'm not a paper racer, but I've seen consistent numbers enough to rely on them and I have to ask when I do find my 55......... am I going to notice a full second worth of difference? I know it'll be punchier, but a full second is a LOT of difference... more than just in the seat of your pants. A second is huge.

1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK430 6.1 14.5
2001 Mercedes-Benz CLK55 AMG 5.0 13.6

http://www.albeedigital.com/supercou...0-60times.html

I'm having a hard time seeing where a full second can be gained in what seems to be not exactly a huge HP boost. So, I figured I'd ask right where someone would know....... the owners. Anyone that has driven both will be able to honestly answer this question.

Hell, either way they are both faster than a Ferrari Testarossa.

1989 Ferrari Testarossa 6.2 14.2
http://www.albeedigital.com/supercou...0-60times.html

Na, but seriously.... with just this small amount of HP added, the 55 really pulls a full second harder? God that is just absolutely huge. I don't think people realize what it takes to move the same car 1 full second faster.
Old 10-20-2008, 09:53 PM
  #19  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Jons95c36amg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Desert
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
02 CLK 55 AMG,09 C63 loaded with P30
I had a little fun with a clk430 coupe. I let him go first when I was still in 5th gear. I reeled him in like he was standing still!
Old 10-20-2008, 10:59 PM
  #20  
Super Member
 
mbenzman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ga.
Posts: 784
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
All of them!
Originally Posted by Jons95c36amg
I had a little fun with a clk430 coupe. I let him go first when I was still in 5th gear. I reeled him in like he was standing still!
I had a CLK430 cab with wheels mess with me in my cab. Wasn't much of a comparison, like a knife against a nuke, but He knew what I had (he's a customer of mine who's ridden in Frankie) and well, got his spanking anyway. Bad boy, stay on the porch!
Here's a test ride.
http://s197.photobucket.com/player.s...fs=1&os=1&ap=1
Old 10-20-2008, 11:04 PM
  #21  
Out Of Control!!
 
blackbenzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 13,487
Received 94 Likes on 77 Posts
haters crazy
This is what happens when you sleep on a CLK430! And yes I won
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=alk0h-_9ul8
Old 10-23-2008, 08:08 PM
  #22  
Junior Member
 
SteveHI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Honolulu, HI
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2005 E55
I had a '99 430. My biggest problem with it wasn't necessarily the HP/torque (or lack thereof), but the transmission. Without getting on the accelerator constantly, it was too slow kickdown and too eager to upshift. The subsequent models with Speedshift would be much preferred.

And although I own a W209 now, I still think the W208 looks better.
Old 10-23-2008, 11:43 PM
  #23  
Super Member
 
GiZzO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: West Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 596
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CLK55 / E350 Coupe
Originally Posted by OPALW208
i owned a 430 before I purchased the 55. Can't put the 2 cars in the same sentence when it comes to performace. They are 2 completely different animals.

The 55 right now is worth every penny, especially when some people are selling theirs in the $12K-$15K price range =)
God and i bought mine for 24k begining of this year. I try to sell myself ya mine was so expensive cause it had warranty, low miles (35k), rims and good history. Only if i waited more into the year.
Old 10-24-2008, 12:49 AM
  #24  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
SoCalCLK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Southern California
Posts: 2,974
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
2017 W205 C43 AMG
Had a 2002 W208 CLK430. Great hp, very easy to drive, smooth power delivery, stable suspension and transmission.

Current 2004 W209 CLK55 AMG. More of everything. Power and transmission are much improved. W209 handles better because of the 40% stiffer chassis and improved AMG suspension and true rack & pinion steering vs. the old ball and track in the W208.

Lookswise, they both looked great in their own right at different angles. I like the W209.
Old 10-24-2008, 12:22 PM
  #25  
Member
 
tnb1786's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SS Minnow Johnson
some of u may know mine was stolen back in Aug. it sux to read everyones glory and excitement over their w208. id buy another one but it wont be DD this go around. i hoping to give blackbenzz a run for his money when i get my next one. in the mean time ill just settle with my w204.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: W208 guys- For anyone that has driven both a 55 and a 430



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:22 PM.