major SNAFU with H&R springs on CLK55
Thread Starter
Newbie
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: Northern California
2001 CLK55
major SNAFU with H&R springs on CLK55
just installed the H&R springs for my '01 CLK55. original setup was stock springs, #4 pads in front, #2 in rear. I have the Monoblock II's off an E55 (8"front 235/40/18, 9"rear 265/35/18 with S02's)
the result: BAAAAAD. the car was WAAAY too low. when i say low, i mean it was SLAMMED - top of wheel was much higher than the top of the arch. wheels were "tucked" into the arches - NOT the look i wanted! (wanted some mild lowering); before and after measurements was 2 1/4 inches lower in front, 2 1/8 inches lower in back!!!!
it appears that the springs were incorrectly boxed, or incorrectly manufactured.
this is being resolved between my installer (a reputable installer / alignment shop) and H&R. will keep you all posted.
i am NOT a happy chappy.
the result: BAAAAAD. the car was WAAAY too low. when i say low, i mean it was SLAMMED - top of wheel was much higher than the top of the arch. wheels were "tucked" into the arches - NOT the look i wanted! (wanted some mild lowering); before and after measurements was 2 1/4 inches lower in front, 2 1/8 inches lower in back!!!!
it appears that the springs were incorrectly boxed, or incorrectly manufactured.
this is being resolved between my installer (a reputable installer / alignment shop) and H&R. will keep you all posted.
i am NOT a happy chappy.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 9,734
Likes: 65
From: Hotlanta
AMG
Re: major SNAFU with H&R springs on CLK55
Originally posted by Boz
i am NOT a happy chappy.
i am NOT a happy chappy.
Sad news indeed
You may consider sourcing the euro CLK55 suspension. Shorter and more aggressive looking.....it looks 'right'
Good luck!
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
From: Randolph, New Jersey
2002 C32 AMG
That BITES !
I hate when sh^t doesn't work they way we hoped and planned -Hope it all works out - I have my Suspension Upgrade in Two Months Planed - The Only differnce is I selected the EvoSport System - We will see. Keep Us Updated..
Thread Starter
Newbie
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: Northern California
2001 CLK55
5439cc - how on earth did you manage to get 10" rims + 20mm spacers under the arches????? damn that must be tight. can you email me pics?
did you need to get the fenders rolled? i've been quoted $200 (front only) in the bay area to get my fenders rolled just in case the fitment is too tight.
did you need to get the fenders rolled? i've been quoted $200 (front only) in the bay area to get my fenders rolled just in case the fitment is too tight.
Thread Starter
Newbie
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: Northern California
2001 CLK55
Re: Re: major SNAFU with H&R springs on CLK55
Originally posted by Chappy
Sad news indeed
You may consider sourcing the euro CLK55 suspension. Shorter and more aggressive looking.....it looks 'right'
Good luck!
Sad news indeed
You may consider sourcing the euro CLK55 suspension. Shorter and more aggressive looking.....it looks 'right'
Good luck!
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 9,734
Likes: 65
From: Hotlanta
AMG
Dealers should be able to order for you. Sorry, but I don't have the part numbers.
Do a search over here.....
http://www.amg-owners-club.org/board/en/wbb2/index.php
Do a search over here.....
http://www.amg-owners-club.org/board/en/wbb2/index.php
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
From: Randolph, New Jersey
2002 C32 AMG
Forward me your e-mail address Boz
Boz - With the sorry as^ limit I can't post any high res pictures - Forward me a email to my address and I will send many pictures - RJMCON@OPTONLINE.NET
And No, I have no rubbing - She really looks mean now - Nothing like a mean B^tch.
And No, I have no rubbing - She really looks mean now - Nothing like a mean B^tch.
Trending Topics
MB World Stories
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren
Verdad Gallardo
8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine
Verdad Gallardo
Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction
Verdad Gallardo
Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping
Verdad Gallardo
10 Most Reliable Mercedes-Benz Models You Can Buy Used
Verdad Gallardo
Thread Starter
Newbie
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: Northern California
2001 CLK55
Originally posted by 5439cc
Boz - Did you get the pictures I forward to you ?
Boz - Did you get the pictures I forward to you ?
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
From: Mid West
1997 C36 AMG
Re: major SNAFU with H&R springs on CLK55
Originally posted by Boz
just installed the H&R springs for my '01 CLK55. original setup was stock springs, #4 pads in front, #2 in rear. I have the Monoblock II's off an E55 (8"front 235/40/18, 9"rear 265/35/18 with S02's)
the result: BAAAAAD. the car was WAAAY too low. when i say low, i mean it was SLAMMED - top of wheel was much higher than the top of the arch. wheels were "tucked" into the arches - NOT the look i wanted! (wanted some mild lowering); before and after measurements was 2 1/4 inches lower in front, 2 1/8 inches lower in back!!!!
it appears that the springs were incorrectly boxed, or incorrectly manufactured.
this is being resolved between my installer (a reputable installer / alignment shop) and H&R. will keep you all posted.
i am NOT a happy chappy.
just installed the H&R springs for my '01 CLK55. original setup was stock springs, #4 pads in front, #2 in rear. I have the Monoblock II's off an E55 (8"front 235/40/18, 9"rear 265/35/18 with S02's)
the result: BAAAAAD. the car was WAAAY too low. when i say low, i mean it was SLAMMED - top of wheel was much higher than the top of the arch. wheels were "tucked" into the arches - NOT the look i wanted! (wanted some mild lowering); before and after measurements was 2 1/4 inches lower in front, 2 1/8 inches lower in back!!!!
it appears that the springs were incorrectly boxed, or incorrectly manufactured.
this is being resolved between my installer (a reputable installer / alignment shop) and H&R. will keep you all posted.
i am NOT a happy chappy.
I think you tires might have been to tall as well for CLK55 (w208)
I have seen couple CLK W208 with 18" mono combo with 225/40/18 and 255/35/18
just a thought..
Regardz,
Out Of Control!!
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 35,855
Likes: 3
From: Southern CA
Boz,
Where did you buy the springs? Have you verified that they are the correct part # for the CLK55? The w208 55 has different springs than the 320/430 and both vary depending on whether the car is a coupe or convertible.
Your part # should read: 29377
Thanks,
Ben
Where did you buy the springs? Have you verified that they are the correct part # for the CLK55? The w208 55 has different springs than the 320/430 and both vary depending on whether the car is a coupe or convertible.
Your part # should read: 29377
Thanks,
Ben
Thread Starter
Newbie
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: Northern California
2001 CLK55
Originally posted by Mach430
Boz,
Where did you buy the springs? Have you verified that they are the correct part # for the CLK55? The w208 55 has different springs than the 320/430 and both vary depending on whether the car is a coupe or convertible.
Your part # should read: 29377
Thanks,
Ben
Boz,
Where did you buy the springs? Have you verified that they are the correct part # for the CLK55? The w208 55 has different springs than the 320/430 and both vary depending on whether the car is a coupe or convertible.
Your part # should read: 29377
Thanks,
Ben
Thread Starter
Newbie
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: Northern California
2001 CLK55
just spoke with the supplier. H&R will be recalling the springs, and then testing them on their equipment to see what the story is. my supplier assured me that either H&R or the supplier would pick up the labor cost of install + de-install (~$640!!). of course, this'll happen AFTER they test the springs.
i'm pretty damn gun-shy regarding aftermarket springs after all this.
i'm pretty damn gun-shy regarding aftermarket springs after all this.
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
From: Mid West
1997 C36 AMG
All this talks about the spring being too low
and I am even more curious to see what the drop looks like on your car.
I think any pic would be great, as I have lowered one of my friends CLK320.
Just help to see if the car really way too slammed than its supposed too....
Since the sense of perfect height for everyone is different..
Regardz,
and I am even more curious to see what the drop looks like on your car.
I think any pic would be great, as I have lowered one of my friends CLK320.
Just help to see if the car really way too slammed than its supposed too....
Since the sense of perfect height for everyone is different..
Regardz,
Thread Starter
Newbie
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: Northern California
2001 CLK55
Originally posted by Boz
just spoke with the supplier. H&R will be recalling the springs, and then testing them on their equipment to see what the story is. my supplier assured me that either H&R or the supplier would pick up the labor cost of install + de-install (~$640!!). of course, this'll happen AFTER they test the springs.
i'm pretty damn gun-shy regarding aftermarket springs after all this.
just spoke with the supplier. H&R will be recalling the springs, and then testing them on their equipment to see what the story is. my supplier assured me that either H&R or the supplier would pick up the labor cost of install + de-install (~$640!!). of course, this'll happen AFTER they test the springs.
i'm pretty damn gun-shy regarding aftermarket springs after all this.
