CLK63 Black Series Forum & Registry Information and discussion on the W209 CLK63 AMG Black Series and Registry for all owners.

Selling the BS.... Price?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Feb 25, 2009 | 06:29 PM
  #176  
Carl Lassiter's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,146
Likes: 1
From: L.A., CA
'08 M5, '10 Land Cruiser
Originally Posted by SL2003driver
No I never have. I pay cash for everything. Except gas and some meals out, airfare when you buy online. May not be smart since I never have any tax write-off's but I like to own stuff.
+1
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2009 | 08:00 PM
  #177  
jrcart's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 55
From: Naperville, IL/Chicago
2008 CLK63 Black Series 2012 C63 Black Series 2014 SLS Black Series
Originally Posted by SL2003driver
No I never have. I pay cash for everything. Except gas and some meals out, airfare when you buy online. May not be smart since I never have any tax write-off's but I like to own stuff.
I can't agree with this statement. Up until 6-8 months ago paying cash for big ticket items was not the smartest way to do it. Finance, finance, finace, put as little down as possible and invest the rest of the money. Why pay cash for a $100k car when you could invest that $100k and easily make 7-8% or more return on the investment when banks and car manufacturers where offering 36-60 month financing at 0-5.9%, not to mention any additional write offs financing or a lease would bring. Just to say you "own" something, you were leaving lots of money on the table, it was like free money.

Now times have changed, we can't count on 8% returns so paying cash makes a little more sense.
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2009 | 09:19 PM
  #178  
LZH's Avatar
LZH
Banned
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,735
Likes: 1
CLK 63 Black Series, 2009 S550, 2011 Range Rover Supercharged, BMW F800 GS Anniv Edition
Originally Posted by jrcart
I can't agree with this statement. Up until 6-8 months ago paying cash for big ticket items was not the smartest way to do it. Finance, finance, finace, put as little down as possible and invest the rest of the money. Why pay cash for a $100k car when you could invest that $100k and easily make 7-8% or more return on the investment when banks and car manufacturers where offering 36-60 month financing at 0-5.9%, not to mention any additional write offs financing or a lease would bring. Just to say you "own" something, you were leaving lots of money on the table, it was like free money.

Now times have changed, we can't count on 8% returns so paying cash makes a little more sense.
100% correct. If you can use the tax write offs and make money with good investments while capitalizing on better finance rates, why the hell not?? Giving up your hard earned after tax cash that could be used to make you money and pay for part of the vehicle is just not a wise financial decision.
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2009 | 12:13 AM
  #179  
IngenereAMG's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,703
Likes: 5
From: Arizona
SL55AMG, Ferrari 348, Ferrari Testarossa, Ferrari F40, Ferrari Mondial t, Ducati 916, Indycar
I have just been offered a 2K mile BS for $90K, and I think there may be a bit more room. They started at $99, and quickly called back and offered the car at $90.
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2009 | 12:25 AM
  #180  
Frankster's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 270
Likes: 24
From: Sunny California
Originally Posted by IngenereAMG
I have just been offered a 2K mile BS for $90K, and I think there may be a bit more room. They started at $99, and quickly called back and offered the car at $90.
Take it, that's a pretty fair deal for this economy. More importantly, you'll really forget what you paid for this car once you're in it.
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2009 | 09:01 AM
  #181  
Doctodd33's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,018
Likes: 148
From: South Florida
ML350
Originally Posted by jrcart
I recently posted a thread about people getting denied loans on $60,000 cars with high 700 credit scores or being told they have to cough up huge down payments. A good friend of mine is the GM at a large Audi dealership, he said they are getting people in the door that want to spend money but they can't get financed and nobody has $20,000 sitting around to use as a down payment. He says they see 2 types of buyers at the Audi dealerships, the 17-20% of buyers that walk in and write a check for an A6 or A8 and the other 80% that walk in with $1000.00 or less to put down on a car. 13 years ago I was making a fraction of what I make now, I walked into my local BMW dealership signed my name and drive off with a a 1995 BMW M3 with no money down and a trade I was upsidedown on...boy how have times changed. Two weeks ago I was buying a new ride that was only $45,000 and you would have thought I was asking for a $3,000,000 mortgage with all the garbage the needed to see.
this really sucks.....i usually dont pay cash for anything, and if financing is out of the picture, it doesnt look good for me.
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2009 | 10:48 AM
  #182  
jrcart's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 55
From: Naperville, IL/Chicago
2008 CLK63 Black Series 2012 C63 Black Series 2014 SLS Black Series
Originally Posted by Doctodd33
this really sucks.....i usually dont pay cash for anything, and if financing is out of the picture, it doesnt look good for me.
I'm not saying that it wil be impossible to get financed, but it seems things went from one extreme to another. You better have all your ducks in a row, a high 700 plus credit score and some cash to put down if you are looking for a luxury car these days. I think it was too easy to obtain credit for the majority of people over the past 15 years. With the way cars depreciate I can't believe banks were giving 0 down payment 60 month loans. I think people should be required to put down 10%-15% on a car, it would weed a lot of the people buying cars they really can't afford. I always laugh when I drive by some of the apartment complexes in my area, these people are renting $1200.00 a month apartments and they all have Bimmers, Benz's, Jags and Hummers in the parking lot...most of these people should be investing in a home instead of driving a luxury name plate automobile, they are not fooling anybody IMO. I know for a fact some of these people are paying more for their car payment than their rent
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2009 | 10:59 AM
  #183  
SL2003driver's Avatar
Super Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 950
Likes: 3
From: Maui, Hawaii
CLS63, GLK350
Guys if we were "smart" we wouldn't be driving cars that cost 6 figures
Reply
MB World Stories

The Best of Mercedes & AMG

story-0

6 Mercedes Models That Did NOT Age Well (But Are Somehow Still Cool)

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun

 Verdad Gallardo
story-2

Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction

 Verdad Gallardo
story-5

Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve

 Verdad Gallardo
story-8

Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping

 Verdad Gallardo
story-9

10 Most Reliable Mercedes-Benz Models You Can Buy Used

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Feb 26, 2009 | 11:30 AM
  #184  
jrcart's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 55
From: Naperville, IL/Chicago
2008 CLK63 Black Series 2012 C63 Black Series 2014 SLS Black Series
Originally Posted by SL2003driver
Guys if we were "smart" we wouldn't be driving cars that cost 6 figures
It's all relative, person making $60k a year that buys a $30K Camry is really no different than a person making $400K buying a $200K car..they both just spent half their yearly income on a car, right? I would assume that most of the guys on here that bought a new Black Series make well over $250k a year. The reality is that most people spend more than half their yearly income on when purchasing a new car.
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2009 | 11:37 AM
  #185  
TMC M5's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,895
Likes: 53
From: Maryland
'14 E63S & '14 Audi SQ5
Originally Posted by jrcart
It's all relative, person making $60k a year that buys a $30K Camry is really no different than a person making $400K buying a $200K car..they both just spent half their yearly income on a car, right? I would assume that most of the guys on here that bought a new Black Series make well over $250k a year. The reality is that most people spend more than half their yearly income on when purchasing a new car.
Very true...you can even make the point that the person making $400K has way more disposable income in relation to other expenses (depending on other lifestyle choices). So that person with $400K in income would have even less of a financial strain purchasing a $200K car than the person getting the Camry. Everything is relative.

Tom
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2009 | 11:42 AM
  #186  
SL2003driver's Avatar
Super Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 950
Likes: 3
From: Maui, Hawaii
CLS63, GLK350
Originally Posted by TMC M5
Very true...you can even make the point that the person making $400K has way more disposable income in relation to other expenses (depending on other lifestyle choices). So that person with $400K in income would have even less of a financial strain purchasing a $200K car than the person getting the Camry. Everything is relative.

Tom
When I said "smart" I did not mean ability. But were all just a bunch of big kids and life is short. So to me this is a great time to get some great cars for great prices.
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2009 | 11:47 AM
  #187  
jrcart's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 55
From: Naperville, IL/Chicago
2008 CLK63 Black Series 2012 C63 Black Series 2014 SLS Black Series
Originally Posted by SL2003driver
When I said "smart" I did not mean ability. But were all just a bunch of big kids and life is short. So to me this is a great time to get some great cars for great prices.
...oh, sorry, I misunderstood your post. Hell ya, I'm the biggest kid on here, I do some dumb azz shizzle sometimes, but it's all in fun, you are right, life is short, so I am trying to make the most of it.
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2009 | 01:14 PM
  #188  
clkwork's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,311
Likes: 4
CLK63 Black Series
How much you make is irrelevant. If you want the car bad enough and have the means then go for it. Life's short and you only live once. The only reason to be worried about how much other people make is if you bought the car as a status symbol, and honestly if you bought a CLK black as a status symbol you could have done a whole lot better.

/makes less than 250k
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2009 | 03:58 PM
  #189  
Doctodd33's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,018
Likes: 148
From: South Florida
ML350
Miami is all about bling so yes i see tons of people living beyond their means driving a BMW or MB or whatever......i also see people wearing LV and Coach handbags and tons of jewelry paying for food with foodstamps. But i dont think they are thinking life is short. I agree life is short, but the stress of making payments one possibly cant afford takes the fun out life, makes one lose sleep....isnt worth it.
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2009 | 04:24 PM
  #190  
jrcart's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 55
From: Naperville, IL/Chicago
2008 CLK63 Black Series 2012 C63 Black Series 2014 SLS Black Series
Originally Posted by vmspionage
How much you make is irrelevant. If you want the car bad enough and have the means then go for it. Life's short and you only live once. The only reason to be worried about how much other people make is if you bought the car as a status symbol, and honestly if you bought a CLK black as a status symbol you could have done a whole lot better.

/makes less than 250k
"How much you make is irrelevant" ??? WTF??? This is exactly this kind of thinking that has gotten this country into the mess it is in today. People having to buy stuff they really can't afford, the bigger house, the nicer car(s), the boat/yacht, the bigger diamond ring, etc. How much you make is the most relevant part! I'm sorry, but a person that does not have a household income that is at least close to $250k a year or have a 7 figure nest-egg or trust fund sitting around should not be buying a $140k automobile...call me crazy, but that is a prime example of living beyond your means IMO.

BTW you totaly contradicted yourself in your post, in one sentence you state "How much you make is irrelevant" and then you say "if you have the means then go for it"
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2009 | 04:32 PM
  #191  
Frankster's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 270
Likes: 24
From: Sunny California
yep, it's all relevent to what you make. Some people take on more risk than they should - asset / debt ratio. The more you make the more you spend.
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2009 | 05:18 PM
  #192  
DFW01E55's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,566
Likes: 7
'14 ML BT
Originally Posted by jrcart
"How much you make is irrelevant" ??? WTF??? This is exactly this kind of thinking that has gotten this country into the mess it is in today. ...
No it's not.

The banks (investment and commercial) and brokers were falsifying applications long ago and then discovered how easy it was with NINJA loans (No Income No Job or Assets) to create cash flow and pad their accounts. This explosion of credit drove housing prices straight up (in many markets) and created demand for new houses. Houses that the market didn't need.

They (houses) then became a revolving credit card which could be tapped every 12 months for 30k to 40k in home equity cash. Real estate always goes up, right?

Credit became so easy that peer pressure dominated people to the point where they had to have 2 newer, bigger better SUV's and home than the folks next door.

The manufacturers and media participated by telling you, "You deserve it now", "why wait, you can have it today" and the whole culture of instant gratification became a religion.

Then you're receiving 3 and 4 credit card offers PER DAY in the mail and how could people not fall for it .... unless they had some personal discipline?

I'm blaming Greenspan, Bernanke and Paulson, they put the mechanisms in place for this lunacy and then stood by and watched it explode.

They cooked the dope, our politicians injected it and "we the people" got addicted. Clinton and Bush were just tools for them ... and both elitist groups view the rest of us as collateral damage.

/rant
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2009 | 05:33 PM
  #193  
TMC M5's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,895
Likes: 53
From: Maryland
'14 E63S & '14 Audi SQ5
Originally Posted by DFW01E55
No it's not.

The banks (investment and commercial) and brokers were falsifying applications long ago and then discovered how easy it was with NINJA loans (No Income No Job or Assets) to create cash flow and pad their accounts. This explosion of credit drove housing prices straight up (in many markets) and created demand for new houses. Houses that the market didn't need.

They (houses) then became a revolving credit card which could be tapped every 12 months for 30k to 40k in home equity cash. Real estate always goes up, right?

Credit became so easy that peer pressure dominated people to the point where they had to have 2 newer, bigger better SUV's and home than the folks next door.

The manufacturers and media participated by telling you, "You deserve it now", "why wait, you can have it today" and the whole culture of instant gratification became a religion.

Then you're receiving 3 and 4 credit card offers PER DAY in the mail and how could people not fall for it .... unless they had some personal discipline?

I'm blaming Greenspan, Bernanke and Paulson, they put the mechanisms in place for this lunacy and then stood by and watched it explode.

They cooked the dope, our politicians injected it and "we the people" got addicted. Clinton and Bush were just tools for them ... and both elitist groups view the rest of us as collateral damage.

/rant

I think Jim is still right....excusing their actions as a reult of "peer pressure" lets people off the hook for irresponsible behavior. You have valid points across the board too...but I wouldn't limit the blame to the people in charge of the Fed or Treasury and just the mortgage brokers/banks.

Tom
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2009 | 05:38 PM
  #194  
SL2003driver's Avatar
Super Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 950
Likes: 3
From: Maui, Hawaii
CLS63, GLK350
Originally Posted by DFW01E55
No it's not.

The banks (investment and commercial) and brokers were falsifying applications long ago and then discovered how easy it was with NINJA loans (No Income No Job or Assets) to create cash flow and pad their accounts. This explosion of credit drove housing prices straight up (in many markets) and created demand for new houses. Houses that the market didn't need.

They (houses) then became a revolving credit card which could be tapped every 12 months for 30k to 40k in home equity cash. Real estate always goes up, right?

Credit became so easy that peer pressure dominated people to the point where they had to have 2 newer, bigger better SUV's and home than the folks next door.

The manufacturers and media participated by telling you, "You deserve it now", "why wait, you can have it today" and the whole culture of instant gratification became a religion.

Then you're receiving 3 and 4 credit card offers PER DAY in the mail and how could people not fall for it .... unless they had some personal discipline?

I'm blaming Greenspan, Bernanke and Paulson, they put the mechanisms in place for this lunacy and then stood by and watched it explode.

They cooked the dope, our politicians injected it and "we the people" got addicted. Clinton and Bush were just tools for them ... and both elitist groups view the rest of us as collateral damage.

/rant
I think you hit the nail on the head
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2009 | 05:40 PM
  #195  
Carl Lassiter's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,146
Likes: 1
From: L.A., CA
'08 M5, '10 Land Cruiser
Originally Posted by jrcart
"How much you make is irrelevant" ??? WTF??? This is exactly this kind of thinking that has gotten this country into the mess it is in today. People having to buy stuff they really can't afford, the bigger house, the nicer car(s), the boat/yacht, the bigger diamond ring, etc. How much you make is the most relevant part! I'm sorry, but a person that does not have a household income that is at least close to $250k a year or have a 7 figure nest-egg or trust fund sitting around should not be buying a $140k automobile...call me crazy, but that is a prime example of living beyond your means IMO.

BTW you totaly contradicted yourself in your post, in one sentence you state "How much you make is irrelevant" and then you say "if you have the means then go for it"
All good points, this post hits the nail squarely on the head.
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2009 | 05:51 PM
  #196  
AMG Dictator's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 420
Likes: 0
CLK Black
Originally Posted by DFW01E55
No it's not.

The banks (investment and commercial) and brokers were falsifying applications long ago and then discovered how easy it was with NINJA loans (No Income No Job or Assets) to create cash flow and pad their accounts. This explosion of credit drove housing prices straight up (in many markets) and created demand for new houses. Houses that the market didn't need.

They (houses) then became a revolving credit card which could be tapped every 12 months for 30k to 40k in home equity cash. Real estate always goes up, right?

Credit became so easy that peer pressure dominated people to the point where they had to have 2 newer, bigger better SUV's and home than the folks next door.

The manufacturers and media participated by telling you, "You deserve it now", "why wait, you can have it today" and the whole culture of instant gratification became a religion.

Then you're receiving 3 and 4 credit card offers PER DAY in the mail and how could people not fall for it .... unless they had some personal discipline?

I'm blaming Greenspan, Bernanke and Paulson, they put the mechanisms in place for this lunacy and then stood by and watched it explode.

They cooked the dope, our politicians injected it and "we the people" got addicted. Clinton and Bush were just tools for them ... and both elitist groups view the rest of us as collateral damage.

/rant
I know that you were just making a point but to me this is as much about personal accountability.

If you make 100K you shouldn't be buying a 100K car no matter how many people enable and encourage you.

You still know that it won't work.

This must all be based on this "new math" I keep hearing about.
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2009 | 06:17 PM
  #197  
Doctodd33's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,018
Likes: 148
From: South Florida
ML350
actually i can go further into why this all happened, and i dont blame Bush a whole lot. Who should you blame about our current financial mess with banks who loaned money to people who couldnt afford the homes?.....we are all responsible for that. But also banks were forced to make sub-prime loans and this was proudly announced by the Clinton administration's Andrew Cuomo on April 6, 1998. During the press conference Cuomo admitted that there would be a higher default rate on these loans. They did it anyway. Did u know that Obama was an attorney who won a large case that forced banks into making these loans to people who couldnt afford them?

http://www.gather.com/viewArticle.js...81474977473892
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2009 | 06:33 PM
  #198  
Doctodd33's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,018
Likes: 148
From: South Florida
ML350
also, i blame the head of the Finance committee, Barney Frank, a democrat from New Jersey. He said ON TELEVISION a few months before the failure of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae that everything was fine and they were strong. How did that end up? The head of the finance committee is in charge of overseeing our nation's financial district. He is partially responsible for the billions of retirement dollars lost by the people of this country.
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2009 | 06:33 PM
  #199  
jrcart's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 55
From: Naperville, IL/Chicago
2008 CLK63 Black Series 2012 C63 Black Series 2014 SLS Black Series
Originally Posted by DFW01E55
No it's not.

The banks (investment and commercial) and brokers were falsifying applications long ago and then discovered how easy it was with NINJA loans (No Income No Job or Assets) to create cash flow and pad their accounts. This explosion of credit drove housing prices straight up (in many markets) and created demand for new houses. Houses that the market didn't need.

They (houses) then became a revolving credit card which could be tapped every 12 months for 30k to 40k in home equity cash. Real estate always goes up, right?

Credit became so easy that peer pressure dominated people to the point where they had to have 2 newer, bigger better SUV's and home than the folks next door.

The manufacturers and media participated by telling you, "You deserve it now", "why wait, you can have it today" and the whole culture of instant gratification became a religion.

Then you're receiving 3 and 4 credit card offers PER DAY in the mail and how could people not fall for it .... unless they had some personal discipline?

I'm blaming Greenspan, Bernanke and Paulson, they put the mechanisms in place for this lunacy and then stood by and watched it explode.

They cooked the dope, our politicians injected it and "we the people" got addicted. Clinton and Bush were just tools for them ... and both elitist groups view the rest of us as collateral damage.

/rant
...and with these "NINJA" loans and the practices that came along with it people refied the hell out of their homes and in some cases pulled out 110% of the equity to spend on the luxury cars, boats and other lavish items THEY COULD NOT AFFORD OTHERWISE. the bottom line is that there are a lot of people in way over there heads due to people living well beyond there means.
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2009 | 06:47 PM
  #200  
jrcart's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 55
From: Naperville, IL/Chicago
2008 CLK63 Black Series 2012 C63 Black Series 2014 SLS Black Series
Originally Posted by Doctodd33
also, i blame the head of the Finance committee, Barney Frank, a democrat from New Jersey. He said ON TELEVISION a few months before the failure of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae that everything was fine and they were strong. How did that end up? The head of the finance committee is in charge of overseeing our nation's financial district. He is partially responsible for the billions of retirement dollars lost by the people of this country.
It is clearly evident that you know what you are talking about and brought facts to back it up. I am not a financial wizzard, but I learned the value of a dollar at a young age and I also learned not to spend more than you can afford, I thought that was common sense, but I guess not.

What I do know is we have a mess on our hands that is the result of the government, the banks and greedy and irresponsible people and now the rest of us are going to be handed a broom by Mr Obama and asked to clean up the mess.

Last edited by jrcart; Feb 26, 2009 at 08:23 PM.
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:49 PM.

story-0
6 Mercedes Models That Did NOT Age Well (But Are Somehow Still Cool)

Slideshow: Not every Mercedes design becomes timeless, some feel stuck in the era they came from.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:09:07


VIEW MORE
story-1
Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun

Slideshow: Yes, Mercedes built manual cars, and some of them are far more interesting than you'd expect.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-02 12:36:58


VIEW MORE
story-2
Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren

Slideshow: A one-of-one U.S.-spec Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren Roadster became even rarer after a factory-backed transformation at McLaren's headquarters.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-29 11:19:28


VIEW MORE
story-3
8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine

Slideshow: Before curves took over, Mercedes mastered the art of the straight line, and some of those shapes still look right today.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-25 12:05:49


VIEW MORE
story-4
Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction

Slideshow: The 190E Evolution II shows how a homologation necessity became a six-figure collector icon.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-22 17:53:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know

Slideshow: Mercedes is turning one of its core nameplates electric, and the details show just how serious this shift is.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-21 13:58:06


VIEW MORE
story-6
Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know

Slideshow: Faster charging, longer range, and a controversial steer-by-wire system define the latest evolution of Mercedes-Benz EQS.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-15 10:35:34


VIEW MORE
story-7
5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve

Slideshow: These overlooked Mercedes-Benz models never got the spotlight, but they quietly delivered more than most remember.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-13 19:35:45


VIEW MORE
story-8
Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping

Slideshow: A well-used 1991 Mercedes-Benz 300D with more than one million miles is now looking for a new owner, and it still appears ready for more.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-10 10:05:15


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Most Reliable Mercedes-Benz Models You Can Buy Used

Slideshow: From bulletproof sedans to surprisingly tough SUVs, these Mercedes models proved that the three-pointed star can go the distance.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-08 09:55:49


VIEW MORE