CLS vs. BMW 645
Last edited by factoid junkie; Mar 13, 2005 at 02:39 PM.
What is there to like about the SL600? How about the torque and the retractable hardtop?
Looks good on paper though. May work for short drivers with x-ray vision.
Trending Topics
I think the CLS is really different in that provides me with an excellent option, the sexiness of a coupe but the 'maturity' (or sophistication? i guess) of a four door. All I know is when I saw it, it hit a chord. Basically what Im trying to say is they might not be directly comprable (albeit in an odd and scattered sort of way :p ).
Enjoy,
TB
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
pckg) for a 2-3 day test drive over this week end.
My regular car is a lowered SL500 with Eisenmann exhaust and I am debating a
change to the 645 coupe which I think looks and sounds stunning. I have yet
to drive the 645 automatic (Monday), but the CLS is anything but "primal" to
drive. At 160 km/h I felt as though I was in a soundproof chamber being driven
by soemone else. The car pulled to the right, and the steerng shook terribly
at lower speeds (90 km/h), likely due to improper seating of the front tires.
I had no problems with its head room nor with the visibility
I can hardly imagine ANY car being more detached, more remote than the CLS
even with the Sport2 suspension setting.
I figure lowering it will be a must, and I hope it can be done just by resetting
the base level. It will need proper tires (I love the five double spoke E55 wheels
though) and the optional AMG exhaust (more subtle than the Eisenmann).
Last edited by MBStar; Mar 19, 2005 at 11:41 PM.
but rather that the appeal of 645, or BMW in general, is the primal feeling which I think has been lost, making the 645 a secondary choice IMO...Porshe should make an Ultra-Luxury Coupe, I think they would do it right (primally speaking) :p
Thanks for the link
TB
back to back with the CLS (see above). What a fabulous coupe!
Really there cannot be a comparison between these two cars: the CLS is an
oversized luxobarge for the E class drivers who want a more "hip" look, while the
645 is a legitimate Sports coupe. It handled well in all respects, and certainly is
preferable even to the CL500. Where it falls short, I feel, is in the fit and finish
where the CLS is considerably superior.
So there, folks I think we'll have to wait for the new CL (and the new CLK) to
catch up to our Bavarian friends in the coupe market
oversized luxobarge for the E class drivers who want a more "hip" look, while the
645 is a legitimate Sports coupe.
In fact, I would prefer a CLK over a 645i.
) Its funny how some people brags that their car can sustain 0.05g more g than mine and 5mph faster (in typical slalom) than my car. Yeah right...as if that makes a big difference in real world driving.
It has a panoramic sunroof that does not slide backwards. It only tilts a few centimetres upwards. Quite disappointing if you ask me.
I don't understand what people have against i-drive. I think it's a "neat" system. It's easy to use contrary to what many people say.
The 645i drives very well. But as someone just mentioned you're better off getting a Porsche or a Ferrari if you're looking for a seminal sports car experience. I'd go for the CLS personally. Yes it may not drive as good but the design and finish is far superior. Not to mention all the available features. It's worth the money you're putting into it. The 645 is a little over-priced in my opinion.
I agree that for the ultimate sports car you would not look to the CLS
or the 645. What we are talking about here though, is the "sports coupe"
genre, a member of which the CLS is purporting to be.
And in as much as this claim
can be made, the stock CLS falls short on SPORTS by a Bavarian Mile!!
Which does not mean that for a small investment it can't be modified to be an
acceptable member of this club. But stock to stock, apples to apples, the 645 is
truer to form than any MB product.
So there you are Natalie...you can both look good (which I am sure
you don't need a car for) AND drive a fab car....
1.Could not get past the trunk lid. Looks like an afterthought.Imho the car looks great from most angles but the lid sticks out like a sore thumb.
2.I-drive. Yes newer versions are much easier to use but still don't care for it.
3.Lack of rear seat room for hauling the teen daughter around when she isn't out driving on her own. Again sitting in the back felt like an afterthought.
4.Local stealer's tactics.
When seeing the CLS in person for the 1st time,our jaws dropped.Pictures didn't do it justice. Lust at 1st sight.
For now I will keep my lowered "04 SL500 with Eisenmann exhaust.
Don't get me wrong the 645 is a good car. I say "good" because it drives and performs very well. It is an eye-catcher but so is the CLS.
As I've explained earlier, if you're looking for a car that handles like a race car you're better off with a Porsche or a Ferrari. The 645 is more of a "pseudo-sports car." A mixture of luxury and sport. The CLS is one of pure luxury. Take your pick.
Wildcat, jeez, i thought this forum was better off without you, and now youre back. u should keep your lame comments about the CLS to yourself, and stick to forums that you acutally know about. And you wonder why you get flamed? nice to see youre still plugging your CL, now you can plug something else!
I would advise that you respect Wildcat's opinion. He has the right to vent and do as he pleases even if it stirs the emotions a little. He may think that the CLS is a family grocery getter but that does not make it necessarily so. As always not everyone will agree with the majority. Retaliation is not the best approach to counter such asinine claims.
However, I would also caution Wildcat. If you are to argue with such vehemence you need evidence and logic on your side. Just popping up to say that the CLS is a "pig dressed in a suit" reveals the paucity of your contribution and does not nothing weaken the car's credibility or it's value.
This guy just pops up to bash the CLS every now and then, check the history of posts...we went through this whole discussion before. This forum is for people who like the CLS and need to discuss legitimate issues, why waste space with negative comments, if you dont like the CLS, why even post in this forum? They need to create a "hater" forum for people like that...




