AMG GTC vs GTR
I'm trying to understand what may be best for me. I saw some Youtube videos which suggest the GTC is the best sweetspot being that the GTR is too harsh. It seems the consensus on Youtube is that if I'm not going to track it, a GTC is the best option.
Is this what most people are finding? My local dealer only has a GTC for test driving.
Thanks. I never owned a Mercedes before. This is an exciting prospect.
Are you going to track it? Do you like the big wing and dark interior with no sun roof?
I dont see much difference for street driving. Heck, I don’t even use my GTS to the limits on the street.
Thecutter64 has a good point. You’re asking for a push towards the gtr!
I think the performance is close enough not to notice but maybe in terms of on track downforce.




Car now has 23000 miles on it and its wonderfull!
Last edited by tblountman; May 30, 2019 at 01:22 PM.
Bish
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG




There are considerable price differences. Unless you track the car, no need for the R. Hey that rhymed! LOL
cyberorth: Thecutter64 has a good point. You’re asking for a push towards the gtr!

ZephyrAMG: Unless you track the car, no need for the R.
Thanks to everyone who is chiming. Everyone is being so helpful welcoming me. It's a nice welcome to the MB world... Hey, that's the URL too!
Edit: I'm talking about the GTC Coupe. You can also get the aero package (adds a wing) if you want the similar sporty look of the GTR. Regarding GTC Coupe vs Cabrio, the Coupe has an actual trunk with more space and like I said, a proper fixed wing. The cabrio loses on those two aspects but has a rather quick foldable roof. You can't go wrong with these choices, they're fantastic cars and the differences are subtle, we're nitpicking at a high level.
Last edited by mvb3; May 30, 2019 at 12:51 AM.




I'm not planning on tracking the car. Just using as daily driver.
Are the seats the same ones on the GTC? If so, wouldn't I be just as uncomfortable in the GTC?
I plan to use it as a daily driver. Winter included. Could be anywhere from 2-5 inches of snow a couple times a year. I plan to drive around my dog and potential GF. I'm looking for a quick/sporty car. I don't want something super harsh though. I rode in a friend's Mustang with all sorts of Fast & Furious aftermarket stuff and damn nearly broke my back in a pothole. My trips can be through rough roads - there's always constructions around DC, Baltimore, the beltway, etc, which means the roads can be stripped rough with the ridges they do for weeks or longer before they finally repave them. Some trips can be up to 1.5 or rarely, 2 hours.
I think it's just fine and not rough at all. I haven't had an opportunity to test drive the GT/variants yet because I wanted to narrow it down to one or two models first. From what I'm seeing the GTR is a waste unless I'm tracking it. Therefore, the GTC looks most attractive to me.
I think at this point, I have to go test drive it and see what it's like. Hopefully, they let me drive it around for a nice period of time to experience different speeds, local roads, highway, etc so I can really get a good idea about it. I'll definitely take your insight into consideration: Maybe it isn't the right car for me. But damn, does it look nice!


Great question and input. Currently, I have a 2008 Lexus ISF. It's their RWD 400hp+ doohicky to compete with the M3. Everyone complained how harsh that ride is the first year in production (2008) and they fiddled around with it for later model years.
I think it's just fine and not rough at all. I haven't had an opportunity to test drive the GT/variants yet because I wanted to narrow it down to one or two models first. From what I'm seeing the GTR is a waste unless I'm tracking it. Therefore, the GTC looks most attractive to me.
I think at this point, I have to go test drive it and see what it's like. Hopefully, they let me drive it around for a nice period of time to experience different speeds, local roads, highway, etc so I can really get a good idea about it. I'll definitely take your insight into consideration: Maybe it isn't the right car for me. But damn, does it look nice!





I'm not planning on tracking the car. Just using as daily driver.
Are the seats the same ones on the GTC? If so, wouldn't I be just as uncomfortable in the GTC?
I plan to use it as a daily driver. Winter included. Could be anywhere from 2-5 inches of snow a couple times a year. I plan to drive around my dog and potential GF. I'm looking for a quick/sporty car. I don't want something super harsh though. I rode in a friend's Mustang with all sorts of Fast & Furious aftermarket stuff and damn nearly broke my back in a pothole. My trips can be through rough roads - there's always constructions around DC, Baltimore, the beltway, etc, which means the roads can be stripped rough with the ridges they do for weeks or longer before they finally repave them. Some trips can be up to 1.5 or rarely, 2 hours.
Thanks to everyone who is chiming. Everyone is being so helpful welcoming me. It's a nice welcome to the MB world... Hey, that's the URL too!
The car will work in the winter but it isn't a great winter car. We use our E63s as a winter car. AWD plus the suspension can be raised a bit if needed. In terms of ride firmness, later model years have been more compliant than earlier ones. I assume the GT/GTS without Dynamic Plus will likely ride a touch softer. The GTC has it by default but also has rear wheel steering which makes the car feel more nimble.
In terms of looks, the GTR looks the best, followed by the GTC. Love the wide stance...
Good luck!
I'm trying to understand what may be best for me. I saw some Youtube videos which suggest the GTC is the best sweetspot being that the GTR is too harsh. It seems the consensus on Youtube is that if I'm not going to track it, a GTC is the best option.
Is this what most people are finding? My local dealer only has a GTC for test driving.
Thanks. I never owned a Mercedes before. This is an exciting prospect.
My first time at the track I left it 'flat', but since then I've placed it in its most acute AOA and I believe that the rear does feel more planted. Certainly the AMG Academy must think so since every GT R there has the wing angled as steeply as possible.
My first time at the track I left it 'flat', but since then I've placed it in its most acute AOA and I believe that the rear does feel more planted. Certainly the AMG Academy must think so since every GT R there has the wing angled as steeply as possible.
It is just not wide enough with enough foil... http://www.stengel.mycpanel.princeto...31Lecture3.pdf
It's for show and will do nothing at road speeds for downforce especially in the canyons, if I thought it would make a difference I would have on my car in a nano second.
You guys are all awesome. Thanks for the input so far. What a great community!


