2011 E350 Bluetech
Have horrid memories of Saabs requiring a block and tackle to remove the whole engine to get at stuff that wears out routinely. Spark plugs and whatnot, you couldn't change a worn-out belt in an old Saab without rebuilding half the car. They realized it was killing their rep, though--expensive lesson.
None of us need nor can afford an engine designed to last 500K miles in a commercial vehicle or 20 years in a cruise ship. None of us needs a "rebuildable" engine as is assumed by industrial criteria.
None of us wants to carry around that weight, paying the performance penalties either.
1970s to mid 1980s Mercedes may have been produced closer to this "ideal," but those ideals are ancient history and now irrelevant.
Also pretty true is the notion that Mercedes really aren't and never have been "last forever" cars. The large majority of 1980s-1990s Mercedes still on the road in the USA are basically clunkers, not being maintained hardly at all and mostly seriously deteriorated. They are gross polluters and not particularly fuel efficient by today's standards and the sooner they're gone the better for everyone.

The I6 is more rpm friend, so it have a huge turbo for high end power, while the V6 is all about quick acceleration, little turbo and more gears (7).
I have the V6 and know very well the I6 and what they are capable of, but the V6 will be allways better.
About the iron vs aluminium engines, future is aluminium and many diesel engines here in Europe are made of aluminium, the technology had good improvement in last 8 years.
The V6 320cdi is around Europe for 8 years! all problems are sorted out, the best MB diesel engine for the last 12-15years.
In the other side, the 7G-tronic software is not very well tuned for diesel engines!
You guys have to drive the new 350CDI with 265hp, that's a very good engine, not as fast as the 35d from bmw but its from MB, and MB know how to do diesel engines
PS: Get the V6, just get ride of the DPF and bluetecs stuffs, they only decrease the fuel economy.
What happened to your "today's standards" argument? *Poof* right out the window.
Last edited by 240D 3.0T; Jan 25, 2011 at 10:07 PM.

Incorrect. Its only been in use for 6 years.
That is false information.
Also incorrect, the transmission itself is a bad design.
The V6 went out in mid 2003 in the W221 S320cdi...
If the v6 is having problems, maybe in America, because in Europe is one of the best diesel engines out there.
About the turbo, the GT2260v it only can do max 260hp, the GTB2260vk can do 280, when the GT2359 can do +300!
So witch MB diesel engine was better than this V6 in the last 12-15years?

The Best of Mercedes & AMG
However, does this make them less durable and maintenance free than the current and upcoming petrol engines?
However, does this make them less durable and maintenance free than the current and upcoming petrol engines?
The iron cylinder liners are cast into the aluminum cylinder block and no press in sleeves are available. That means once the cylinder bore is damaged or excessively worn, the block (aka, the engine) is scrap metal. That, by definition, means the engine is not rebuildable.
The entire engine is filled with integrated parts that, if damaged or worn, require many other components to be replaced with it.
The valvecovers are integral and machined to match to the cylinder head. That means if a valvecover is damaged the entire cylinder head must be replaced.
The turbo is not sold as individual parts. That means if the electronic actuator fails (as they frequently do) the entire turbo must be purchased.
If any of the piston cooling jets in the block are so much as bent, the block is scrap metal (Per MB).
So on and so on. The entire V6 is based around minimal manufacturing costs; not reliability, ease of repairs or longevity.
Interesting bit about the valve cover. I'm actually scratching my head as to what someone would have to do in order to damage it.What have you heard?
On the turbo, that is typical of many parts on many different cars. I've yet to find a company that will sell me just one component as opposed to an entire assembly. For example, right now I am currently in need of a gear for my window motor. Not the entire motor, just the gear; i've had no luck finding anyone who will only sell me just the gear.
The new V6 diesel is interesting and i've talked to several owners and none have had any problems with them yet. I'm curious to hear more about the piston cooling jets and how they can become damaged.
Nevertheless, it really isn't a big issue. I was hoping that you would be able to comment on my other points. (How damage occurs to the various critical components that would make the engine scrap metal). Not because I doubt you, but because I really don't know how this occurs; and would like to know because I am thinking of getting a new bluetech. Something to look out for, I tend to try and buy my vehicles and run them until it becomes a nuissance (about 200,000mi)
On the subject of the OM 603 having/not having cylinder liners... The 603.961 {300SDL and 87 300D} DO have cylinder liners. The 603.97x {350SD/SDL} DON'T have cylinder liners. And unlike you, I will provide some pictures to prove my point...
Have a nice day!
By the way, the images come straight from Mercedes-Benz, I reached out to some corporate friends through Generation-Benz... Try telling them that they are wrong.
Oh, hey, lookie there, an IRON CYLINDER BLOCK!
Last edited by 240D 3.0T; Feb 10, 2011 at 08:21 AM.







Yes its a 2056, I wanted to mention above all 2056 variants instead of 2260
