2008 E320 Bluetec
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
From: S. FLorida, USA
2008 E320 Bluetec, 2004 Landrover DII
2008 E320 Bluetec
I purchased a 2008 E320 Bluetec almost 6 months ago to replace my totaled 2005 E320 CDI. The Bluetec has about the same seat-of-the-pants acceleration feel as the CDI but has much less engine noise and no diesel exhaust smell at all. The only thing I could complain about is that the fuel mileage for the Bluetec is 32/23 mpg compared to 38/25 mpg with my old CDI.
Has anyone heard of any known issues with this vehicle? So far, the only things I've had to do to this vehicle maintenance-wise is add fluid to the windshield washer reservoir and add air to the tires.
Thanks in advance.
Thom
Has anyone heard of any known issues with this vehicle? So far, the only things I've had to do to this vehicle maintenance-wise is add fluid to the windshield washer reservoir and add air to the tires.
Thanks in advance.
Thom
Banned
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,116
Likes: 5
From: Federal Heights, CO
1982 300D VNT, 1980 240D 3.0T, 1982 300TD
The biggest issue is the DPF causes high fuel consumption and will cost about $4000 to replace when it clogs with ash (and by design, it will). Second issue is the engine is a bean-counter designed throwaway.
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
From: S. FLorida, USA
2008 E320 Bluetec, 2004 Landrover DII
$4000.00... Holy crap 
This is the first I've heard of a DPF. Does it need to be replaced often???? I've only got 23000 miles on the car.
Thom
This is the first I've heard of a DPF. Does it need to be replaced often???? I've only got 23000 miles on the car.
Thom
Banned
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,116
Likes: 5
From: Federal Heights, CO
1982 300D VNT, 1980 240D 3.0T, 1982 300TD
Life depends on the driver. Stop-n-go driving and hard driving will significantly shorten its lifespan. However, a highway living car may never need a new one. By EPA law it has to last at least 80k miles.
There is no avoiding it. When the soot is burned it leaves behind ash and eventually plugs up the filter, the only way to solve that is a new filter. Its not some Fram filter either, its still very expensive to make one even though they've been in use around the world for over a decade.
The best option is to remove the DPF and buy a programmer that will disable the regeneration cycle and its checks.
There is no avoiding it. When the soot is burned it leaves behind ash and eventually plugs up the filter, the only way to solve that is a new filter. Its not some Fram filter either, its still very expensive to make one even though they've been in use around the world for over a decade.
The best option is to remove the DPF and buy a programmer that will disable the regeneration cycle and its checks.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,192
Likes: 242
From: Albuquerque
'10 CL550, '12 GL550
It's the reason for the switch to low-sulphur fuel.
It's also the reason you see no smoke, no soot on rear of vehicle and smell no diesel odor.
Perhaps you're concerned about the cost of this item, but it's simply the cost of doing business, i.e. owning a modern diesel car. With the exception--if you think so--of this cost, there's zero/zip/nada/nothing better about pre-2007 Mercedes diesels. I've owned them, and they are crap compared to these new models.
If your fancy COMAND radio breaks down, it will be expensive to fix, too. Do you think the solution is a car from the 1970s with AM only?
Just ignore the hysteric.
Banned
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,116
Likes: 5
From: Federal Heights, CO
1982 300D VNT, 1980 240D 3.0T, 1982 300TD
It's the reason for the switch to low-sulphur fuel.
there's zero/zip/nada/nothing better about pre-2007 Mercedes diesels.
If all you're concerned about is the 25hp difference, get a tuner.
The reason the V6 "performs" better is the tiny turbo spools up quicker than the I-6's much larger and more efficient turbo and the DPF allowed more aggressive (dirty) tuning since the filter will mask it.
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
From: S. FLorida, USA
2008 E320 Bluetec, 2004 Landrover DII
It's a diesel particulate filter and is required on ALL diesel vehicles sold in USA beginning 2007 (even 18-wheelers).
It's the reason for the switch to low-sulphur fuel.
It's also the reason you see no smoke, no soot on rear of vehicle and smell no diesel odor.
Perhaps you're concerned about the cost of this item, but it's simply the cost of doing business, i.e. owning a modern diesel car. With the exception--if you think so--of this cost, there's zero/zip/nada/nothing better about pre-2007 Mercedes diesels. I've owned them, and they are crap compared to these new models.
If your fancy COMAND radio breaks down, it will be expensive to fix, too. Do you think the solution is a car from the 1970s with AM only?
Just ignore the hysteric.
It's the reason for the switch to low-sulphur fuel.
It's also the reason you see no smoke, no soot on rear of vehicle and smell no diesel odor.
Perhaps you're concerned about the cost of this item, but it's simply the cost of doing business, i.e. owning a modern diesel car. With the exception--if you think so--of this cost, there's zero/zip/nada/nothing better about pre-2007 Mercedes diesels. I've owned them, and they are crap compared to these new models.
If your fancy COMAND radio breaks down, it will be expensive to fix, too. Do you think the solution is a car from the 1970s with AM only?
Just ignore the hysteric.
Dont you think it's just a tad absurd to compare the technology of a 2005 CDI or a 2008 Bluetec to that of the 1970's engines? Besides I like my FM.
Thom
Trending Topics
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
From: S. FLorida, USA
2008 E320 Bluetec, 2004 Landrover DII
Life depends on the driver. Stop-n-go driving and hard driving will significantly shorten its lifespan. However, a highway living car may never need a new one. By EPA law it has to last at least 80k miles.
There is no avoiding it. When the soot is burned it leaves behind ash and eventually plugs up the filter, the only way to solve that is a new filter. Its not some Fram filter either, its still very expensive to make one even though they've been in use around the world for over a decade.
The best option is to remove the DPF and buy a programmer that will disable the regeneration cycle and its checks.
There is no avoiding it. When the soot is burned it leaves behind ash and eventually plugs up the filter, the only way to solve that is a new filter. Its not some Fram filter either, its still very expensive to make one even though they've been in use around the world for over a decade.
The best option is to remove the DPF and buy a programmer that will disable the regeneration cycle and its checks.
I definitely have some researching to do.
Thom
MB World Stories
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
New Electric Mercedes-AMG GT 4-Door Coupe Unveiled: 10 Things You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
6 Mercedes Models That Did NOT Age Well (But Are Somehow Still Cool)
Verdad Gallardo
Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren
Verdad Gallardo
8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine
Verdad Gallardo
Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction
Verdad Gallardo
Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve
Verdad Gallardo
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 313
Likes: 2
From: Toronto, Canada
2005 E320 CDI (sold); 2007 R320 CDI (sold); 2008 ML320 CDI; 2014 ML350 Bluetec
That is false information.
Also VERY false information. The inline 6 engine is far better built, gets better fuel economy, is rebuildable, doesn't need balance shafts to compensate for vibration, will live much longer and doesn't have the poorly matched 7-speed problematic.
If all you're concerned about is the 25hp difference, get a tuner.
The reason the V6 "performs" better is the tiny turbo spools up quicker than the I-6's much larger and more efficient turbo and the DPF allowed more aggressive (dirty) tuning since the filter will mask it.
Also VERY false information. The inline 6 engine is far better built, gets better fuel economy, is rebuildable, doesn't need balance shafts to compensate for vibration, will live much longer and doesn't have the poorly matched 7-speed problematic.
If all you're concerned about is the 25hp difference, get a tuner.
The reason the V6 "performs" better is the tiny turbo spools up quicker than the I-6's much larger and more efficient turbo and the DPF allowed more aggressive (dirty) tuning since the filter will mask it.
Do you have any link or hint where/how to disable DPF .?
Junior Member
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 48
Likes: 2
From: NC
2008 MB E320 BlueTec. 2011 Porsche Boxster 987. 2016 Mazda CX-5 Sport MT, 1995 BMW K75 motorcycle
With long distance driving at around 70 mph I get routinely 38 mpg with my '08 E320 Bluetec. Having said that, I don't completely trust the instruments indicating this figure. When I use the old method of dividing the miles driven by the number of gallons I add at the next fuel stop the number is up to 2 mpg lower.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,192
Likes: 242
From: Albuquerque
'10 CL550, '12 GL550
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
From: S. FLorida, USA
2008 E320 Bluetec, 2004 Landrover DII
With long distance driving at around 70 mph I get routinely 38 mpg with my '08 E320 Bluetec. Having said that, I don't completely trust the instruments indicating this figure. When I use the old method of dividing the miles driven by the number of gallons I add at the next fuel stop the number is up to 2 mpg lower.
It's unclear from your post if you're getting 40 mpg from the computer and 38 mpg by calculating using the old method or 38 mpg from the computer and 36 mpg using the old method. Though either way your mileage is still several mpg better than I'm getting. It could be driving style and location. I typically drive between 70-80 mph on the highway and of course city driving is always stop-and-go... mostly stop.
BTW, I neglected to mention that I always use the old-fashion method of calculating fuel mileage. I have no idea why this discrepancy occurs but calculations between old-fashioned and the computer are always different with the computer showing 34/35 mpg as opposed to 31/32 by dividing miles by # gallons.
Come to think of it, I've never acheived advertised window-sticker mileage on any vehicle I've owned in the past.
Thom
Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
From: Four Oaks, NC
1991 Mercedes 350SD, 2006 Mercedes E320 CDI
You would have been far better off in the long run to purchase a 2006 CDI even if you had to have it shipped across the USA. The emission controls are so sophisticated on the V6 that the engine has to inject raw diesel fuel into the combustion chamber on the exhaust stroke so it can travel to the DPF and actively burn the particulate out of the filter. This is the reason for the reduction in mileage. A novel idea by the US regulatory authorities to burn more fuel to protect the environment.
Banned
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,116
Likes: 5
From: Federal Heights, CO
1982 300D VNT, 1980 240D 3.0T, 1982 300TD
If it were true, you'd better go put one on every 2007-2010 ML230 CDI and R320 CDI as well as nearly every semi on the road that was made from 2007-2009!
Please provide proof of your claim, lkchris. In fact you're wrong simply due to the fact the EPA cannot require specific emissions controls to be used, the EPA can only set the emissions limits. Its up to the individual manufacturers as to what methods are used to meet those limits.
Last edited by 240D 3.0T; Dec 4, 2010 at 07:36 AM.
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
From: S. FLorida, USA
2008 E320 Bluetec, 2004 Landrover DII
You would have been far better off in the long run to purchase a 2006 CDI even if you had to have it shipped across the USA. The emission controls are so sophisticated on the V6 that the engine has to inject raw diesel fuel into the combustion chamber on the exhaust stroke so it can travel to the DPF and actively burn the particulate out of the filter. This is the reason for the reduction in mileage. A novel idea by the US regulatory authorities to burn more fuel to protect the environment.
Thom
