ULSD
If that is the case I would have the first laugh and then the last laugh on you Mr. Carsy. For you are either very gullible or profiting big time on this illusion called "environmentalism".
As for me I am looking for a 1980s big smoke belching MB 5 cylinder diesel engine, just to annoy silly greenies like yourself.
You think I am joking? Just look at the McDonald McNugget class action farce.

Next time please post a wet keyboard/monitor alert.
Thom
Cato has been funded by: Philip Morris, R.J. Reynolds, Bell Atlantic Network Services, BellSouth Corporation, Digital Equipment Corporation, GTE Corporation, Microsoft Corp- oration, Netscape Communications Corporation, NYNEX Corporation, Sun Microsystems, Viacom International, American Express, Chase Manhattan Bank, Chemical Bank, Citicorp/Citibank, Commonwealth Fund, Prudential Securities and Salomon Brothers. Energy conglomerates include: Chevron Companies, Exxon Company, Shell Oil Company and Tenneco Gas, as well as the American Petroleum Institute, Amoco Foundation and Atlantic Richfield Foundation. Cato's pharmaceutical donors include Eli Lilly & Company, Merck & Company and Pfizer, Inc. (http://www.pfaw.org/pfaw/general/default.aspx?oid=9261) Between 1985 and 2001, the Institute received $15,718,040 in 112 grants from ten conservative foundations: Castle Rock Foundation (reformed Coors Foundation), Charles G. Koch Charitable Foundation, Earhart Foundation, JM Foundation, John M. Olin Foundation, Inc., Claude R. Lambe Charitable Foundation, Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation, Sarah Scaife Foundation, Carthage Foundation, David H Koch Foundation. (http://www.mediatransparency.org/sea...cipient.php?51) The Cato Institute is a member of the State Policy Network 4/04
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Cato has been funded by: Philip Morris, R.J. Reynolds, Bell Atlantic Network Services, BellSouth Corporation, Digital Equipment Corporation, GTE Corporation, Microsoft Corp- oration, Netscape Communications Corporation, NYNEX Corporation, Sun Microsystems, Viacom International, American Express, Chase Manhattan Bank, Chemical Bank, Citicorp/Citibank, Commonwealth Fund, Prudential Securities and Salomon Brothers. Energy conglomerates include: Chevron Companies, Exxon Company, Shell Oil Company and Tenneco Gas, as well as the American Petroleum Institute, Amoco Foundation and Atlantic Richfield Foundation. Cato's pharmaceutical donors include Eli Lilly & Company, Merck & Company and Pfizer, Inc. (http://www.pfaw.org/pfaw/general/default.aspx?oid=9261) Between 1985 and 2001, the Institute received $15,718,040 in 112 grants from ten conservative foundations: Castle Rock Foundation (reformed Coors Foundation), Charles G. Koch Charitable Foundation, Earhart Foundation, JM Foundation, John M. Olin Foundation, Inc., Claude R. Lambe Charitable Foundation, Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation, Sarah Scaife Foundation, Carthage Foundation, David H Koch Foundation. (http://www.mediatransparency.org/sea...cipient.php?51) The Cato Institute is a member of the State Policy Network 4/04
Last edited by harkgar; Dec 19, 2010 at 10:29 PM. Reason: Disclaimer: I do own PM, MO, MSFT, ORCL and C
Look at the weather in Europe. They are frozen solid. Look at Canada. We are brass-monkeyed too. Even the UN Climax Change clowns did not get their hot weather in Cancun. Does that look like global warming to you?
Facts vs ideological fiction. Facts win.
I went for a fly with my son the other day in his little Pitts & used 80 litres an hour !!
I am not a greeny, just a practical old bloke who is worried about the reason for unusual extended dry periods that have occured in Southern Australia over the last 20 years which have devastated the farming community.
I read the other day that China are building 1000 coal fired power stations next year. India cannot get enough coal , importing it from everywhere. Australia is presently experiencing a mining boom supplying all the iron ore & coal. Mate, I hope that you are correct & that there is no such thing as man induced global warming because there is little willingness amongst industrial & developing nations to make any cuts.
But if you are wrong we are in deep ##@$. They reckon that the worlds ocean currents are a finely balanced phenomenon. Imaging if the current warming Europe & the UK were to stop. A complete freeze over each winter. http://tcktcktck.org/stories/climate...-current-slows
I think we should keep an open mind to what the scientists are saying.
My old Pug is a 4 cyl petrol & a pleasure to drive . We did 450,000 km in our previous 1979 Peugeot 504 without the head coming off. Sold it to an Arab for $1000 to be cut up , put in a container & shipped for spares in Egypt.!!
I went for a fly with my son the other day in his little Pitts & used 80 litres an hour !!
I am not a greeny, just a practical old bloke who is worried about the reason for unusual extended dry periods that have occured in Southern Australia over the last 20 years which have devastated the farming community.
I read the other day that China are building 1000 coal fired power stations next year. India cannot get enough coal , importing it from everywhere. Australia is presently experiencing a mining boom supplying all the iron ore & coal. Mate, I hope that you are correct & that there is no such thing as man induced global warming because there is little willingness amongst industrial & developing nations to make any cuts.
But if you are wrong we are in deep ##@$. They reckon that the worlds ocean currents are a finely balanced phenomenon. Imaging if the current warming Europe & the UK were to stop. A complete freeze over each winter. http://tcktcktck.org/stories/climate...-current-slows
I think we should keep an open mind to what the scientists are saying.
My old Pug is a 4 cyl petrol & a pleasure to drive . We did 450,000 km in our previous 1979 Peugeot 504 without the head coming off. Sold it to an Arab for $1000 to be cut up , put in a container & shipped for spares in Egypt.!!
Global warming, if it exists, will benefit some people and harm others. It will benefit Canada (we can grow more wheat) and hurt some tiny islands in the Pacific because, according to the alarmists, they may be under water in 20 years.
The industrial revolution ended 200 years ago in Britain and pollution continued there until 20 years ago. How can the west in clear conscience ask the Chinese and the Indians to do what it failed to do?
They can arguably demand the same 200 years of pollution.
Last edited by harkgar; Dec 21, 2010 at 01:32 AM. Reason: correction: the industrial revolution STARTED 200 years ago.
The argument is like that of the recent dam building in China. It flooded some villages but benefited most Chinese. Ditto with the Hoover Dam building when Americans were fighting for a share of the water resulting from the project.
Present day "environmentalists" trouble-makers are no different from other trouble makers with an agenda. Create conflict to scuttle the common sense majority group requiring proof of this newly coined term "Climate Change". As far as I am concerned there is insufficient evidence for these UN parasites to provide proof.
Once enacted, laws good and very bad, will remain in place forever. Be vigilant!
No wonder the US governement is discouraging diesel engines. Firstly there is not a single local diesel car produced locally and secondly, local car makers had invested heavily in battery cars.
The Chinese and Indians are more philosophical about this. They are also excellent at emulating what Europe and north America did in the last 200 years, down to the last detail. It is the most sincere form of flattery.
There's a mini ice age coming, says
man who beats weather experts
http://www.smh.com.au/environment/we...221-1945a.html
Global warming... Global cooling...?? Nobody really knows with any degree of accuracy because our knowledge and technology just are not up to the challenge.
Thom
On top of that, we have only a pin***** size of history's weather data. From the BC's up until the 1800's the information was no more than people guessing numbers. Even from the 1800's to the 1950's data accuracy is questionable at best since there were no across the board standards or checks set. 50 years of data can't tell us what the earth has in store for us next after 4,600,000,000 years of constant change.
Last edited by 240D 3.0T; Jan 3, 2011 at 10:22 AM.





