Removing Intake Flaps
If you follow the mod thread my car is reflashed to eliminate EGR and add a bit more power, I'm not actually concerned that with EGR defeated that my flaps will fail, I'm far more interested in getting more power while not really exceeding the 27 psi peak boost pressure I'm currently running. My car is a daily driver but very seldom does the motor run for less than 17-20 miles per engine start, most of my driving is commuting state highways so fairly light load type driving, the other half of my driving is LONG distance work, like Texas to Reno for the air races and back in 8 days total, or 1-2k mile 2-3 day weekends Storm Chasing in the desert southwest and into the Great Plains area.
So I guess the basic question is this, are there any actual or perceived downsides to killing the intake flaps? How about benefits? I know there is a roughly 10-15% increase in airflow into the head! I also know that this in no way directly translates to more power without adding more fuel but obviously there would be a reduction in pumping loss so a small additional gain in efficiency.
Does anyone have a spare "uncleanable" intake manifold they would like to sell me? I'm in Texas so would prefer to pay only domestic shipping rates plus parts cost. I'm hoping to minimize down time with the car off road and would like to take my time preparing the replacement manifold, welding up the little holes is no issue for me nor is cleaning, I have the tools and ability to finish the job the way I like.
Has anyone done a before and after dyno test on a manifold modified in a similar way, if so what were the results? The next round of mods includes installing water/methanol injection from AEM for diesel use since intake air temps pre turbo are often in the 110-120F range here in the brutal Texas heat, with re-routed case breather and EGR killed along with regular water/meth steam cleaning of the manifold I expect the modded manifold will stay VERY clean for a long time, at least till I'm done with the car.
Your thoughts please? Btw, my car is straight pipes from turbo to tail so no pesky restrictions to catch soot build up other than my precious little VNT turbocharger.
I purchased intake w/o flaps from EU and if I remember correctly it cost me less than 150$ and the mail man delivered it to my garage. Just and heads up, if buy one ask them to ship it w/regular mail to avoid customs charges (have to pay 25$ to get my turbo released because was shipped via Fedex).
Any future plans for intercooler upgrade?
Btw, these are not my pics, they may well have come from this forum though, just some I've been studying that I got off Google Images. I saw one for sale modified in the way I wish to do here a month or so back, so wish I had just bought it...but I tend to overthink these things too long. eBay has also been of little to no help, seems more often the case than not lately. I've actually been considering buying a total loss car for CHEAP just to scavenge parts and build a spare motor that's extra evil...cause I have a sickness I suppose?
On my supercharged v-twin Mile racer, water/meth alone was worth close to 20 bhp at only 13.5lbs boost. The motor stays new-build clean inside too, and I've seen the insides enough times to appreciate this fact.
I know they call them "swirl flaps" but I'm pretty sure this is nice marketing speak more than actual effective engineering. The asymmetrical ports in the head are the real turbulence generators and port offset the real inducer of swirl, the flaps could increase this effect in a minor way. They might indeed clean up emissions in some micro fractional manner at idle and just off idle, areas where my motor is seldom operated.
I did not even know they existed until after finishing up my exhaust, now with motor at 65-85C or "up to temp" I hear/feel a change around 1500-1800 rpm on light throttle uphill acceleration in lower gears, sort of reminiscent of the change in induction noise on my NSX as V-Tech activates. That was what led me searching for the cause and where I started seeing all the horror stories of gumming up and general failure and filthy manifolds...hence where I arrived at my next little mod. The intake was coming off anyway at the next major service and I have a serious problem leaving stuff alone so I'm just planning and stockpiling parts right now.
It will be interesting to put the dead stock high mileage manifold and the non flapper manifold on the flow bench and test the actual flow numbers before and after such modification. It sure looks like a 15% or so obstruction even with the valves open due to protruding shafts! butterflies and bolt heads and threads.
Nice to hear I'm not the only one who questions the infinite wisdom of MB. After having my catastrophic SBC failure and darn near a month long battle with MB over getting it fixed to my satisfaction my faith in Teutonic arrogance and engineering is a wee bit shaken, I'm trying to love my car again...and more power is helping the healing process.
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
http://www.ebay.de/itm/Mercedes-W211...item2ecc76dc1b
ask him how much the shipping will be.
Thanks for the link, I'll check it out and see about shipping, I'm guessing that might be a deal killer but we shall see. After reading probably a hundred posts from all sorts of MB owners with dealers telling them the manifolds can't be fixed part of my interest is just proving that it can, and for WAY le$$ than a new manifold costs.
I'm pretty sure there are small gains possible without the obstruction so near the high velocity portion of the inlet port, with little if any losses in the real world. It seems many OEM's have become obsessed with complexity for the sake of complexity. I tune motorcycles for a living and secondary throttle plates are used in many models, obviously for different reasons but, 99% of the time when tuning for best power removing the things is worth the effort. Only on one 600cc Kawasaki motor did I see any loss, and it was minimal and only above 14k rpm with minimal gains below.
In dyno tuning motorcycles I personally get a bigger kick out of cruisers and Harley's than sportbikes, the gains are so much easier to make and more impressive, now turbo bikes of any variety are another thing altogether, like two strokes, just right amount of pure evil and sheer terror to make you smile, and they don't suffer fools lightly. Hopefully riding a turbo Victory in an upcoming Texas Mile event that I've been working with a customer on, nothing too crazy, just shooting for the record in its class, only have to beat 168 mph and leave with a running motor and the owner will be super pleased, the biggest tuning issue on that bike right now is boost management to stay under the per rod torque limit of 80 ft/lbs across a 5,500 rpm range, at only 9 psi we are at the friggin ragged edge to 5,500 rpm so progressive boost control is gonna have replace simplicity on that one.
I don't mess with diesels for money, just for fun, I'm loving getting 35-40mpg in my daily driver while still pushing myself back in the seat harder than any of my other car toys. Since I like playing with airplanes too and TDI is definitely the future there, just injecting Jet-A instead of normal diesel, I'm trying to learn as fast as I can on the ground. There is one more speed record I'd like to own eventually and it can only be done with wings and a prop.
If your intrigued look up the DeltaHawk V4 TSDI two stroke, the potential is there for some amazing stuff.
Thanks for the additional link, inquiries in. I need to make a deal soon either for a car dyno, or rental time on one to properly document this project. As a full time dyno tuner I know how I should be doing this, and relying on accelerometer iPhone apps is probably not it, though it am surprised at the quality of the data when you use real base numbers for actual rolling weight and do two way pulls to eliminate grades and winds or at least minimize that error.
I am long time diesel engine and diesel technology fan and I know how efficient and durable is the two-stroke diesel w/o compromising power and torque compare to gasoline counterpart. It is being engine of choice for propelling fright trains and ships while maintaining low operating cost. Their BSFC for ship engines is 0.260 lbs/hp/hour and thermal efficiency exceeding 50% with very low rotational speed.
Speaking of bikes, what is your opinion on Triumph Rocket III (I know that his internal intake swirl valves need to be removed).
Basic mods, proper tapered 3:1 header with about 18" perforated baffle length, 60mm ID, pod filters, light porting and high compression pistons and a WAY stiffer clutch spring set is turly sick, and capable of way more power than the short gearing allows full exploitation of. Normal mods alone still make TDI like torque...fun with a capitol F
Will keep this in mind. Thanks
As for uncleanable, I was one of those victims. Reason is not that it's uncleanble, but that the typical parts changer doesnt want to lose other jobs cleaning yours that may or may not be perfect, and turn into a "come back job". They just swap out and move on. My intake was kept by the dealer after the job was done, but if you go by a few dealerships, they may have old ones laying around in a scrap metal bin?
Good stuff on your mods so far.
I agree with your assessment of parts changers at the dealer btw, I'm one of the last of a breed in decline who gets more jollies from fixing than replacing but it's already established I'm a wee bit eccentric.
There are a LOT of manifolds on German eBay...this is getting interesting.
I also have a 190d 2.5 Inline 5 cylinder diesel that was supposed to be a project car...it has a manual tranny. Wish I had time for projects. Restoration, turbo motor, run it part time WMV oil....if I had time. Too many projects, must simplify my life. All this stuff eats into my airplane time....
Last edited by Micah / AF1 Rac; Mar 5, 2014 at 09:00 AM.


