E-Class (W124) 1984-1995: E 260, E 300, E 320, E 420, E 500 (Includes CE, T, TD models)

which w124 to buy

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 05-29-2009, 04:13 PM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
roach_juts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: entertainment capital of the world, Socal
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2000 e430( w210),1979 240D (w123), 1992 300e(w124), 1990 mitsubishi galant VR4
which w124 to buy

hello

i want to get another w124 body my choices are
1995 e320 miles are 192000 $3400.00 obo
and a 1992 300e miles are 109000 $3000.00 obo

both cars are in good running condition

my question is which one is worth buying & easy to maintain,
Old 05-29-2009, 04:36 PM
  #2  
Member
 
ds190's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
300TE, 300CE
Higher mileage car will have more wear items to replace. 104 engine more likely to blow head gasket and need wiring harness; 103 engine likely to need valve stem seals. 95 is face lift and 92 is not, so which look do you like better? Easy to maintain means how much can you do yourself- I don't think there's much difference between the two.
Old 05-29-2009, 04:48 PM
  #3  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Saijin_Naib's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,968
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
1990 300ce 24v I6
M104 is much peppier than the M103 too
Old 05-29-2009, 05:59 PM
  #4  
Member
Thread Starter
 
roach_juts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: entertainment capital of the world, Socal
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2000 e430( w210),1979 240D (w123), 1992 300e(w124), 1990 mitsubishi galant VR4
OK thanksss a lot !!!
Old 05-29-2009, 08:35 PM
  #5  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
ps2cho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,381
Likes: 0
Received 29 Likes on 25 Posts
E
I personally like the lower body cladding of the later w124's. Both are great though!

I would go with whatever has the lowest miles though engine-wise.
Old 05-30-2009, 04:40 PM
  #6  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
YNVDIZW124's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Long Beach, Ca
Posts: 2,849
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
lots of cars
lower miles doesn't always mean better, above 150k i'm sure there have been a lot of issues worked out. I always stick to the 10k miles per year rule, for a 95 i would look for 140k miles. You don't want a car with super low miles that's been sitting for a year while all the rubber gets hard and cracks.
Old 05-30-2009, 05:29 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
vili1982's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Cambridge, Ontario
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
95 E320 Coupe, Diesel Golf
Go with the 95 E500.
Old 05-30-2009, 07:02 PM
  #8  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
neanderthal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,016
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Whichever has more maintenance records.
Old 05-30-2009, 09:50 PM
  #9  
Member
 
DCarrera's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Bremerton, WA
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2000 ML430
Originally Posted by vili1982
Go with the 95 E500.
Having owned a '92, I'd go with an earlier year. The '95 also has interior updates that pre-facelift does not. As much as I loved my 'early' W124's I'd go with the later model. although 195,000 on the clock is pretty long in the tooth.
Old 05-31-2009, 02:45 AM
  #10  
Member
Thread Starter
 
roach_juts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: entertainment capital of the world, Socal
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2000 e430( w210),1979 240D (w123), 1992 300e(w124), 1990 mitsubishi galant VR4
i WISH i could get a running e500 with $3k budget hell yeah !! , but for now i will settle for the 95 e320 or the 92 300e, if i get the 92 300e this will be my 4th, and i know some basic maintenance on it like tune up, change oil .. etc.. the only thing i like abt the 95 e320 , how it looks with
Old 05-31-2009, 01:44 PM
  #11  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
190E 16V's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 1,450
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
1987 560SL
In short, my very low mileage (43K mi) W124, ran beautifully when I bought it and everything worked. Within 8 mos. I had spent $8K on renewing perished rubber, seals, Bakelite timing guides and other things on motor and suspension - due to lack of frequent and regular maintenance.

I hear this is not uncommon.

The tranny frequently loses reverse gear by these mileages - $3K for repair. Look for delay in shifting into reverse. It will run a long time like this, but failure is inevitable.

Look for oil leaks - 6 cyl is notorious for going through head gaskets.

- Check each car for DOCUMENTED maintenance.

- MOST Important - Have a Pre-purchase Inspection done.

Good luck, I hope this helps you to make the best choice
Old 05-31-2009, 02:03 PM
  #12  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
ZorroAMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 3,491
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Enzo, my Benzo
There is no 95 E500.

92-94.
Old 06-01-2009, 02:45 AM
  #13  
Member
Thread Starter
 
roach_juts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: entertainment capital of the world, Socal
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2000 e430( w210),1979 240D (w123), 1992 300e(w124), 1990 mitsubishi galant VR4
thats true. my previous 92 300e had a delay when its shifted to reverse, & 1 more thing happend i have to replace the neutral switch, because everytime i have to start the car. i have to put the gear in neutral

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: which w124 to buy



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:04 AM.