Post-conversion Problem
"Hello All, I got a 1990 300CE 12V and I recently replaced my auto gearbox with a 5-speed manual gearbox (with the related flywheel, new clutch, new clutch master and slave cylinder, differential, etc.). Every thing went fine but the post-conversion performance is discouraging. The car feels somewhat 'soft' - acceleration in 1st and 2nd gear is pretty weak and the car cruise more quietly than before but the car can hardly pull from 4th and 5th gear. The manual gearbox and differential were taken from a 1992 300CE 24V so is it possible that the differential is a mismatch? My mechanic told me that my original differential's ratio is 2.65, but there is no similar inscription on the differential newly fitted to my car. Any advice on what might be the problem and what solution is available? Am pretty disappointed with the outcome of the conversion. The car used to run very well with a very willing and reliable engine (M103)." (Posted by QVHK on 18 June 2010)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"The gear ratio will be stamped into the differential housing, as shown in this photo (the first numbers are the serial number, the last few numbers are the ratio). You will probably need to clean it up with a wire brush to read this this as it's often covered with grime or rust.
That said... the 1990 300CE (124.051) came from the factory with a 3.27 gear ratio and a 4-speed auto in the USA. In Europe it was also offered with 4-speed manual with 3.27 ratio, or a 5-speed auto and 3.69 gear ratio.
The 1992 300CE (124.051) with 4-speed auto had a 3.06 ratio in the USA. In Europe, it was offered with a 4-speed auto or 5-speed manual with 3.06 ratio, or a 5-speed auto with 3.69 ratio. (The 124.052's went to 2.65 gears in the USA.)
Sounds like you previously had a 3.27 ratio, and ended up with a 2.65 ratio, which would cause the problem. Since this is not at all related to LSD, you should probably start a new thread on this topic, and post a link here so we can follow the progress. Oh, and it would also help if you posted your location (USA, Europe, etc)...
(Posted by AMGDave on 18 June 2010)
Forgot to mention my 300CE is in Hong Kong (hence RHD). Chassis: 124.050, Engine M103, originally fitted with 4-speed auto gearbox.
The vehicle where the 5-speed manual gearbox came from is a 1992 300CE 24v (source unknown, somewhere in Europe), but the seller claimed that the manual gearbox on his CE is for M103 (717.433). As power seems to have gone down after conversion, I am researching into the final drive ratios to see if things could improve if I find another axle that would fit - the question is, which one? There are many specs out there. Mine has ABS not ASD/LSD. Any advice would be appreciated. I am trying to trace the seller to find out more about the manual gearbox and axle that came with it, but I wonder whether they were original on his 24V. I understand from literature that only the first batch of W124 of 1988-89 has manual transmission?
Since you have a 124.050 with M103 engine (not a 24v), that would have come with a 3.07 gear ratio (in the smaller 185mm size). I still suspect you ended up with a 2.65 ratio from the Euro donor car, but reading the number off the diff will verify this.
Here is another photo showing where to look for the numbers. This is a 210mm diff installed on a 500E, but the location will be the same on your CE, with either 185mm or 210mm diff:

Can you find out what manual transmission you have? The type & serial number should be stamped on the housing somewhere... should be somethinf like "717.450". Then you may be able to find the gear ratios, and compare to the original auto tranny. I'm thinking that a 3.27 may help but depending on the exact 5-speed trans you have, something even lower might work. It mostly depends on the 5th gear ratio, if it's 1:1 or if it has overdrive (something like 0.80:1).
:o
Trending Topics
Maybe the VIN or chassis wrong, if you are sure you have a 2.87 with a 717.433 gearbox. I did find that the 717.433 gearbox was used with the 124.030 and 124.050 (plus a few others), but not the .051 chassis. The 717.433 gearbox has an overdrive 5th gear (0.799 ratio) so it should be used with a pretty tall rear axle, i.e. 3.27-3.69 if you want the acceleration to be snappy.
Something isn't adding up here.... btw, the tranny 5th gear ratios are in the MB TDM (Technical Data Manual), Group 26, "Coordination transmission", in the footnotes. Sadly, it doesn't list the ratios for gears 1-4. I'm suspecting you may have the "overdrive" tranny with a way too tall rear axle ratio, which is causing the problem.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
The flywheel could not spin freely on first installation, as space was too tight and the workshop had to saw away the obstacle to make sufficient space. The engine still refused to start after clearing the way for the flywheel - it started alright after the workshop replaced the flywheel sensor.
At the 5th gear, the CE maintains the speed of 85 km/h (we use Km rather miles in Hong Kong) at 1,800 rpm. The engine finds it a bit hard to reach redline now and even revving to 5th take a while. Would check on timing as you suggested.
Assuming the 717.433 is similar to the 717.430, the ratios are:
1st- 3.856
2nd- 2.183
3rd- 1.376
4th- 1.000
5th- 0.799
By comparison, the 717.451 (no overdrive) has ratios of:
1st- 4.151
2nd- 2.523
3rd- 1.687
4th- 1.239
5th- 1.000
The early R129 SL320 (92-94) had a 3.69 ratio in the USA, and the 1990 coupe had a 3.27 ratio, both in 210mm size. You may have to dig through the EPC and see what might work, then try to locate one locally. I'm sure you could find one pretty easily in the USA, and relatively cheap too ($200-$300 USD) but shipping could possibly cost double that or more.
Last edited by QVHK; Aug 1, 2010 at 06:01 AM.
P.S. I shall be away for a week and so may not be able to respond in the next few days.






