E-Class (W210) 1995-2002: E 200, E 220D, E 240, E 290TD, E 300TD, E 200, E 240, E 280, E 320, E 420, E 430 (Wagon, Touring, 4Matic)

215/65 on a W210 (replacing 215/55)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 06-23-2008, 12:55 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
nazrat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
215/65 on a W210 (replacing 215/55)

I ran across a great deal on a set of 215/65 R16 Goodyear tires. I'd like to know if I'll run into rubbing problems on a 2000 E320. The stock tires were 215/55 R16.

According to http://www.miata.net/garage/tirecalc.html I'd be going from 25.3" to 27" in diameter. That will cause the speedo to be off a little, but I'm not concerned with that. I'd like to know if they will rub.

I'm running ET 37 wheels in place of the ET 41 wheels if that helps any.

Thanks,
Tad
Old 06-23-2008, 01:18 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
tirona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1997 s320, 1997 e320
i think the rule of thumb is to be within 3% difference in diameter so the brakes work properly, not to mention traction control, cruise control, and i wouldn;t be surprised if you got a CEL with a transsmision speed sensor error because of the big difference in diameter. in your case the difference is over 6%, so you be the judge, could be just fine or you could have problems. i wouldn't take the risk though by trying to save a few bucks. i don't know about rubbing, but probably will.
Old 06-23-2008, 02:21 PM
  #3  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
ohlord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,171
Received 15 Likes on 11 Posts
300E a couple 1994 w124wagon E320 Wagon/,1971MGB Track/Rally, MG Midget Autocross ,2000 E320 wagon.
The

rule of error is for different tire diameters % front to rear therefore the different revs per mile and the problems with all the systems you mention.
He is talking about going taller front and rear so there will be no difference in how fast the rear tires spin compared to the fronts

nazrat the issue will be not the 1.7 inches taller tire and rubbing ,that you will be fine.The issue will be Pi*D the circumference of the taller tire.
51 fewer revolutions per mile is a huge change.Your speedometer is going to be way off(about 6.6%),the taller effective rear gear ratio is going the make the car feel very sluggish coming off the line.The added height is going to make it look awkward.
Especially when around other Benz's
I won't even go into the aerodynamics involved and the increase in Cd and aerodynamic lift,But if you feel like you are floating down the highway when you are going 75 mph + the speedo error.It is because you will be floating down the highway.
If you don't mind the above issues and the fact that it may look kind of like a jacked up toyota pick up truck jump on the deal.
Personally I would wait and install some good Michelin pilot a/s with the proper size and avoid said problems.
ohlord
better tire tech link
http://www.1010tires.com/tech.asp
The plus side of doing what you think you want to do.You won't need to worry about speed bumps,high curbs,and driveway dips

Last edited by ohlord; 06-23-2008 at 02:23 PM.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 1 votes, 5.00 average.

Quick Reply: 215/65 on a W210 (replacing 215/55)



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:39 AM.