0W-40 or 15W-50?
#1
Member
Thread Starter
0W-40 or 15W-50?
I generally change the oil in my 2001 E320 living in Austin, TX with Mobil1 synthetic 15W-50 for high mile engines. I'm curious if I should consider using 0W-40 instead. Are there advantages or disadvantageous to either one for my environment? I have nearly 160k miles on the car.
#2
Senior Member
Mobil One 0W40 is a recommended oil. The heavier oil that you are using probably wont hurt anything, particularly in the hot climate that you livie in but it is not the recommended viscosity. Why did you go with 15w50? Anyway at this point I would still recommend 0w40.
#3
MBWorld Fanatic!
Never
15w50
it does not have the proper viscosity and definitely does not have the base or the additive package that the M112 needs to live a long and happy life.Flush it and put in the 0w40 wt mobil or any of the several other mb spec oils.
Fleece filter of course![thumbs](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
DIY oil and filter change the proper extraction method www.mercedesshop.com resource section diy articles oil change #2.Saves me some typing![Smilie](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
it does not have the proper viscosity and definitely does not have the base or the additive package that the M112 needs to live a long and happy life.Flush it and put in the 0w40 wt mobil or any of the several other mb spec oils.
Fleece filter of course
![thumbs](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
DIY oil and filter change the proper extraction method www.mercedesshop.com resource section diy articles oil change #2.Saves me some typing
![Smilie](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
![bow](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/bowdown.gif)
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Georgia, USA
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Honda Accord
I generally change the oil in my 2001 E320 living in Austin, TX with Mobil1 synthetic 15W-50 for high mile engines. I'm curious if I should consider using 0W-40 instead. Are there advantages or disadvantageous to either one for my environment? I have nearly 160k miles on the car.
Are you having an oil consumption or leak problem causing you to want to use the heavier motor oil?
#5
Member
Thread Starter
@x72: No leaks, but that's what my local mb only indy shop uses.
@ohlord: I'll have to double check, but iirc the manual lists 15W-50 as one of the supported weights of oil.
@ohlord: I'll have to double check, but iirc the manual lists 15W-50 as one of the supported weights of oil.
#6
Member
Thread Starter
update: I found the booklet to which I was referring. It's "Factory Approved Service Products, October 2000", and among others, it lists "Mobil 1 Tri-Synthetic Formula 15W-50" and "Mobil 1 Tri-Synthetic Formula 0W-40" on MB spec sheet 229.1 as mb approved engine oils. there's also a chart with viscosity grades for motor oils that instructs the reader to "select oil viscosity according to lowest air temperature expected before the next oil change". The weights range from 0W-30 to 20W-50.
#7
MBWorld Fanatic!
229.1 is not applicable to the car in question.
Cars with M112 engine require either 229.3 or 229.5 oil.
IIRC 15W-50 is not an approved oil for this car and 0W-40 is the way to go.
Cars with M112 engine require either 229.3 or 229.5 oil.
IIRC 15W-50 is not an approved oil for this car and 0W-40 is the way to go.
Trending Topics
#8
Member
Thread Starter
fantastic. I guess the person who sold me the car included a booklet from a different model car. ![Frown](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/frown.gif)
I'll be switching back to mobil1 0W-40 this weekend.
![Frown](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/frown.gif)
I'll be switching back to mobil1 0W-40 this weekend.
#9
Member
Thread Starter
at the risk of taking this thread off topic, is there any advantage to draining the oil from the bottom as opposed to using a topsider? I usually use a topsider out of laziness, but should I occasionally drain from the bottom or would I just be wasting time and effort?
#10
Super Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Northeast
Posts: 545
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
e300d
I tend to alternate. It's not a bad idea to get under the car once in a while to see what's leaking and/or broken.
M1 0W40 is the correct oil and carries the mfr's spec required for the engine
M1 0W40 is the correct oil and carries the mfr's spec required for the engine
![Wink](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
#12
MBWorld Fanatic!
Extractor
gets out more due to the drain placement in the pan.You can spend the extra time saved doing it the proper extractor method,inspecting the car from stem to stern and therefore avoid any trips to a shop for A and B services.Diy all the other maint. items yourself![thumbs](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
229.1 is well below mb spec and 15w50 is not the recipe for a long M variant engine life,no matter what some crappy indie shop tells you.
MB changed the minimum spec required a long time ago. 229.1 in modern formulation is going to hurt you in the wallet,
even 229.1 back in the day was not for the FSS extended change intervals.
Run from that shop![EEK!](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/eek.gif)
![thumbs](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
229.1 is well below mb spec and 15w50 is not the recipe for a long M variant engine life,no matter what some crappy indie shop tells you.
MB changed the minimum spec required a long time ago. 229.1 in modern formulation is going to hurt you in the wallet,
even 229.1 back in the day was not for the FSS extended change intervals.
Run from that shop
![EEK!](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/eek.gif)
![bow](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/bowdown.gif)
#13
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: San Diego
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
5 Posts
2012 CLS63 AMG Performace - Obsidian Black
Ohlord... Hey, I realize this one has been beaten to death, but on my 1997 M104, I prefer to run synthetic, simply for the shear and ash properties; I don't mind the extra 2 or 3 bucks a quart. With that in mind, is the 229.1 still applicable? I realize it doesn't have the FSS, but do I want 0W40 in the older inline, or maybe 10W40 Mobil 1? Thanks!!
Chris
Chris
#14
MBWorld Fanatic!
1997
you still want at least 229.3 and with the 1997 not being prone to the leak issues of the earlier M104's on the headgasket and timing cover,if you have been using synthetic and have no leaks(a good condition,properly maintained M104
)
keep using it.0w40 euro syn meets the spec
10w40 does not meet spec
10w50 fuchs
oil does but that is the race engine oil,no need to waste the money.
Happy New Year![Smilie](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
![thumbs](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
keep using it.0w40 euro syn meets the spec
10w40 does not meet spec
10w50 fuchs
![EEK!](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/eek.gif)
Happy New Year
![Smilie](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
![bow](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/bowdown.gif)