E-Class (W210) 1995-2002: E 200, E 220D, E 240, E 290TD, E 300TD, E 200, E 240, E 280, E 320, E 420, E 430 (Wagon, Touring, 4Matic)

0W-40 or 15W-50?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 12-28-2008, 08:25 PM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
purplegrog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 176
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
2008 E350 Wagon
0W-40 or 15W-50?

I generally change the oil in my 2001 E320 living in Austin, TX with Mobil1 synthetic 15W-50 for high mile engines. I'm curious if I should consider using 0W-40 instead. Are there advantages or disadvantageous to either one for my environment? I have nearly 160k miles on the car.
Old 12-28-2008, 09:13 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
01BlackE320's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 463
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
01 E320
Mobil One 0W40 is a recommended oil. The heavier oil that you are using probably wont hurt anything, particularly in the hot climate that you livie in but it is not the recommended viscosity. Why did you go with 15w50? Anyway at this point I would still recommend 0w40.
Old 12-28-2008, 09:24 PM
  #3  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
ohlord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,171
Received 15 Likes on 11 Posts
300E a couple 1994 w124wagon E320 Wagon/,1971MGB Track/Rally, MG Midget Autocross ,2000 E320 wagon.
Never

15w50
it does not have the proper viscosity and definitely does not have the base or the additive package that the M112 needs to live a long and happy life.Flush it and put in the 0w40 wt mobil or any of the several other mb spec oils.
Fleece filter of course
DIY oil and filter change the proper extraction method www.mercedesshop.com resource section diy articles oil change #2.Saves me some typing
Old 12-29-2008, 10:41 AM
  #4  
X72
Senior Member
 
X72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Georgia, USA
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Honda Accord
Originally Posted by purplegrog
I generally change the oil in my 2001 E320 living in Austin, TX with Mobil1 synthetic 15W-50 for high mile engines. I'm curious if I should consider using 0W-40 instead. Are there advantages or disadvantageous to either one for my environment? I have nearly 160k miles on the car.
You will pay a slight fuel economy penalty with the 15W-50. I wouldn't hesitate to use it as long as the ambient temperature remained above 40 degrees F, but the 40W oil is preferable because of better fuel economy.

Are you having an oil consumption or leak problem causing you to want to use the heavier motor oil?
Old 12-29-2008, 12:12 PM
  #5  
Member
Thread Starter
 
purplegrog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 176
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
2008 E350 Wagon
@x72: No leaks, but that's what my local mb only indy shop uses.

@ohlord: I'll have to double check, but iirc the manual lists 15W-50 as one of the supported weights of oil.
Old 12-29-2008, 02:15 PM
  #6  
Member
Thread Starter
 
purplegrog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 176
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
2008 E350 Wagon
update: I found the booklet to which I was referring. It's "Factory Approved Service Products, October 2000", and among others, it lists "Mobil 1 Tri-Synthetic Formula 15W-50" and "Mobil 1 Tri-Synthetic Formula 0W-40" on MB spec sheet 229.1 as mb approved engine oils. there's also a chart with viscosity grades for motor oils that instructs the reader to "select oil viscosity according to lowest air temperature expected before the next oil change". The weights range from 0W-30 to 20W-50.
Old 12-29-2008, 04:42 PM
  #7  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
lkchris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Albuquerque
Posts: 6,069
Received 205 Likes on 182 Posts
'07 GL320CDI, '10 CL550
229.1 is not applicable to the car in question.

Cars with M112 engine require either 229.3 or 229.5 oil.

IIRC 15W-50 is not an approved oil for this car and 0W-40 is the way to go.
Old 12-29-2008, 05:56 PM
  #8  
Member
Thread Starter
 
purplegrog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 176
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
2008 E350 Wagon
fantastic. I guess the person who sold me the car included a booklet from a different model car.

I'll be switching back to mobil1 0W-40 this weekend.
Old 12-29-2008, 06:01 PM
  #9  
Member
Thread Starter
 
purplegrog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 176
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
2008 E350 Wagon
at the risk of taking this thread off topic, is there any advantage to draining the oil from the bottom as opposed to using a topsider? I usually use a topsider out of laziness, but should I occasionally drain from the bottom or would I just be wasting time and effort?
Old 12-30-2008, 08:09 AM
  #10  
Super Member
 
uberwgn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Northeast
Posts: 545
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
e300d
I tend to alternate. It's not a bad idea to get under the car once in a while to see what's leaking and/or broken.

M1 0W40 is the correct oil and carries the mfr's spec required for the engine
Old 12-30-2008, 09:47 AM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
01BlackE320's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 463
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
01 E320
Either method works fine. Service centers typically pump it out but whatever's easier for you. I drain only cause I don't have a pump.
Old 12-30-2008, 04:55 PM
  #12  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
ohlord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,171
Received 15 Likes on 11 Posts
300E a couple 1994 w124wagon E320 Wagon/,1971MGB Track/Rally, MG Midget Autocross ,2000 E320 wagon.
Extractor

gets out more due to the drain placement in the pan.You can spend the extra time saved doing it the proper extractor method,inspecting the car from stem to stern and therefore avoid any trips to a shop for A and B services.Diy all the other maint. items yourself
229.1 is well below mb spec and 15w50 is not the recipe for a long M variant engine life,no matter what some crappy indie shop tells you.

MB changed the minimum spec required a long time ago. 229.1 in modern formulation is going to hurt you in the wallet,
even 229.1 back in the day was not for the FSS extended change intervals.
Run from that shop
Old 12-31-2008, 12:53 PM
  #13  
Member
 
socalsounds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: San Diego
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
2012 CLS63 AMG Performace - Obsidian Black
Ohlord... Hey, I realize this one has been beaten to death, but on my 1997 M104, I prefer to run synthetic, simply for the shear and ash properties; I don't mind the extra 2 or 3 bucks a quart. With that in mind, is the 229.1 still applicable? I realize it doesn't have the FSS, but do I want 0W40 in the older inline, or maybe 10W40 Mobil 1? Thanks!!

Chris
Old 12-31-2008, 02:36 PM
  #14  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
ohlord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,171
Received 15 Likes on 11 Posts
300E a couple 1994 w124wagon E320 Wagon/,1971MGB Track/Rally, MG Midget Autocross ,2000 E320 wagon.
1997

you still want at least 229.3 and with the 1997 not being prone to the leak issues of the earlier M104's on the headgasket and timing cover,if you have been using synthetic and have no leaks(a good condition,properly maintained M104)
keep using it.0w40 euro syn meets the spec
10w40 does not meet spec
10w50 fuchs oil does but that is the race engine oil,no need to waste the money.
Happy New Year
Old 12-31-2008, 03:53 PM
  #15  
Member
 
socalsounds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: San Diego
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
2012 CLS63 AMG Performace - Obsidian Black
Thanks- BTW, why do you think it is that 10W40 doesn't meet spec? The amount of viscosity additives, or just the range? Thanks again...

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: 0W-40 or 15W-50?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:38 PM.