CDI mileage
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Queen Creek, AZ
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
CDI mileage
I'm curious as to real world mileage people are getting with their CDI Benz's.
I have done a search and come up with some interesting results (all over the place) and am curious myself to see what the run of the mill mileage is these days.
I'm sure you've posted this before and the subject has been beaten to death, but would you mind posting your mileage, normal driving (highway/city/romping/cruising) and whether or not it's calculated by hand or by the computer.
I'm kind of sort of maybe contemplating buying a 2005/06 CDI.
Thanks.
Toby
I have done a search and come up with some interesting results (all over the place) and am curious myself to see what the run of the mill mileage is these days.
I'm sure you've posted this before and the subject has been beaten to death, but would you mind posting your mileage, normal driving (highway/city/romping/cruising) and whether or not it's calculated by hand or by the computer.
I'm kind of sort of maybe contemplating buying a 2005/06 CDI.
Thanks.
Toby
#2
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: usa
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
w211 cdi 2005
cdi mileage
Always romping, trunk always full of my junk:
hwy: 34
city: 26 (I live in a small town, not new york style stop every block)
this is by the computer. I have not calculated it myself.
chemo
hwy: 34
city: 26 (I live in a small town, not new york style stop every block)
this is by the computer. I have not calculated it myself.
chemo
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 466
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
2005 Volvo S40 T5 AWD, 2004.5 C230 Sport Sedan, 2005 E320 CDI, 2008 C300 4-Matic Luxury
27+ mpg for the week and a half it's been here. driven normally, perhaps a little pushin here and there
note: this is in Hawaii, so the A/C is ALWAYS on and there are many hills/inclines. if you live in a flatter place, i would expect better mileage.
![Wink](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
note: this is in Hawaii, so the A/C is ALWAYS on and there are many hills/inclines. if you live in a flatter place, i would expect better mileage.
#4
Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Jacksonville,Florida
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2005 E230 CDI
With 11,796mi on the clock...
I've been getting average:
city: 35.5 (light traffic in the AM, moderate in the PM)
highway: 40.1
I don't think most of us can really say what the actual real world mileage we're getting due to the fact that these cars are most likely not close to being "broken in" yet, I'd venture to say that the best mileage would be achieved @ or around 40-50k miles. I've been seeing a steady decrease in fuel consumption.
Not to hijack the thread, but what are your mileages as well?
city: 35.5 (light traffic in the AM, moderate in the PM)
highway: 40.1
I don't think most of us can really say what the actual real world mileage we're getting due to the fact that these cars are most likely not close to being "broken in" yet, I'd venture to say that the best mileage would be achieved @ or around 40-50k miles. I've been seeing a steady decrease in fuel consumption.
Not to hijack the thread, but what are your mileages as well?
Last edited by FlintCDI; 08-18-2005 at 07:58 AM. Reason: spelling
#5
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Queen Creek, AZ
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks fellas (FlintCDI, see what you started?).
01 I'm getting 21 (80% highway/20% city)
04 I'm getting 19 (60% highway/40% city) 17 before reflash
02 E320 MBZ 27 (30% highway/70% city)
I agree that the mileage will go up with a looser engine that seats in time.
I look forward to some more answers. Thanks again for those who posted already...it all factors into my decision.
01 I'm getting 21 (80% highway/20% city)
04 I'm getting 19 (60% highway/40% city) 17 before reflash
02 E320 MBZ 27 (30% highway/70% city)
I agree that the mileage will go up with a looser engine that seats in time.
I look forward to some more answers. Thanks again for those who posted already...it all factors into my decision.
![crazy](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/crazy.gif)
#6
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: FL410
Posts: 4,968
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
'05 E320 CDI, '08 BMW X5 4.8i, '11 Duramax 2500HD
I am a bit of a lead foot, and heavy on acceleration... The car also only had 3000 or so miles, so for a diesel, much improvement will occur at 30K+
I get 27 average (80% city/20% highway)
On the 101 loop the other day with the A/C off (temps were rather cool in Phx under overcast).. and with the speed steady at 65mph I was getting 37mpg.
The best I've seen is 41mpg on Happy Valley rd West of the I-17 doing 50 window down and A/C off.. amazing!
BTW.. Check your PM.. we have a tentative plan for our meet.
I get 27 average (80% city/20% highway)
On the 101 loop the other day with the A/C off (temps were rather cool in Phx under overcast).. and with the speed steady at 65mph I was getting 37mpg.
The best I've seen is 41mpg on Happy Valley rd West of the I-17 doing 50 window down and A/C off.. amazing!
BTW.. Check your PM.. we have a tentative plan for our meet.
#7
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
05 E320 CDI
I've been keeping a fuel log for 2005. This data is from fuel pump readings, not the car's trip computer. The trip computer tends to indicate slightly higher MPG (~0.5 MPG) compared to the pump.
Caveats (or reasons why you may not be able to duplicate these results):
1. The car is not my daily driver. When I do drive it, it tends to be on long trips.
2. I keep my tires inflated to 38 psi.
3. I almost always obey the speed limit (max 70 mph in my area.)
4. For 2 tankfuls (1398 miles), there was a fault with my car which caused the mass air sensor to become disconnected. This resulted in the check engine light being illuminated and the engine producing low power (it cruised fine at steady speed, but acceleration was terrible.) This also had the effect of boosting the fuel economy about 1 MPG. Once I got it fixed, the fuel economy returned to "normal" values.
2005 Year to Date information -- 2005 E320 CDI purchased new 04/04:
Odometer 1/1/2005 (Miles): 18123
Miles Driven (~90% Highway): 5466
Diesel Consumed (US Gallons): 143.13
MPG: 38.19
Caveats (or reasons why you may not be able to duplicate these results):
1. The car is not my daily driver. When I do drive it, it tends to be on long trips.
2. I keep my tires inflated to 38 psi.
3. I almost always obey the speed limit (max 70 mph in my area.)
4. For 2 tankfuls (1398 miles), there was a fault with my car which caused the mass air sensor to become disconnected. This resulted in the check engine light being illuminated and the engine producing low power (it cruised fine at steady speed, but acceleration was terrible.) This also had the effect of boosting the fuel economy about 1 MPG. Once I got it fixed, the fuel economy returned to "normal" values.
2005 Year to Date information -- 2005 E320 CDI purchased new 04/04:
Odometer 1/1/2005 (Miles): 18123
Miles Driven (~90% Highway): 5466
Diesel Consumed (US Gallons): 143.13
MPG: 38.19
Trending Topics
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 466
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
2005 Volvo S40 T5 AWD, 2004.5 C230 Sport Sedan, 2005 E320 CDI, 2008 C300 4-Matic Luxury
impressive results, might i recommend, www.greenhybrid.com to you, there you will find: http://www.greenhybrid.com/compare/mileage/ which has a mileage database that helps you keep track of your mileage as well as let others view it, you can add any car you want, it is not limited to hybrids.
#9
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Frederick, MD
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2005 E320 CDI
I'm not at 5000 miles yet, but I'm getting 34 mpg. This is over a 70 mile commute, 54 miles of which is highway. I have the AC on and my speed is usually 70 to 75. (Hey, it's Atlanta. Everyone drives 20 over the speed limit. I think we all want to get away from that city as fast as possible.)
#10
Only have 1800 miles on the odometer. Average milage is often around 25-30. A/C here is used overtime. I also leave the engine on to cool the turbo after a hard run.
#11
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: FL410
Posts: 4,968
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
'05 E320 CDI, '08 BMW X5 4.8i, '11 Duramax 2500HD
Originally Posted by brianhn1
Only have 1800 miles on the odometer. Average milage is often around 25-30. A/C here is used overtime. I also leave the engine on to cool the turbo after a hard run.
how much warm up/cool down do you do?
I've been doing a 1 minute warm up.. and slow on the RPM until it's at normal temp... and about a 1 minute cool down.
#12
Originally Posted by CE750
how much warm up/cool down do you do?
I've been doing a 1 minute warm up.. and slow on the RPM until it's at normal temp... and about a 1 minute cool down.
I've been doing a 1 minute warm up.. and slow on the RPM until it's at normal temp... and about a 1 minute cool down.
#13
Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Lake Goodwin, WA
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2005 E320 CDI, 1999 ML430
I’ve got 33mpg consistently over the first 3000 miles. I drive 60% city 40% highway (guesstimate) and I’ve had the AC set to auto. It’s been very warm here since late June.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Michigan, USA
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
'05 E320 CDI, '07 VW Touareg V10 TDI, 2007 Porsche GT3
Computed from odo and pump readings:
Overall: 32 mpg
Best tank: 37 mpg
Worst tank: 29.4 mpg
Above stats as of 10K miles, 10 months of age. Driving: mostly highway, very little stop-'n-go.
Overall: 32 mpg
Best tank: 37 mpg
Worst tank: 29.4 mpg
Above stats as of 10K miles, 10 months of age. Driving: mostly highway, very little stop-'n-go.
#15
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: FL410
Posts: 4,968
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
'05 E320 CDI, '08 BMW X5 4.8i, '11 Duramax 2500HD
![off topic](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/ot.gif)
I went with a good friend to look at Jags for him yesterday in my CDI, and the salesman (very nice/inteligent type) spent 80% of the time admiring my car.. and going on and on about how he can't believe it's a diesel. He first sat in it and revved the engine a bit, and of course was shocked at the lack of noise, so I took him for a ride.. he said it's likely going to be his next purchase!
![thumbs](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
#16
Newbie
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
'06 BMW 530i, '03 BMW M3
CDI, here I come. Crude was up another $1.70 to $67.50 a barrel today. Since I'm in the market for a more comfortable family sedan and I drive 20k miles a year I just can't see getting anything else right now.
#17
Super Member
Originally Posted by reb03
CDI, here I come. Crude was up another $1.70 to $67.50 a barrel today. Since I'm in the market for a more comfortable family sedan and I drive 20k miles a year I just can't see getting anything else right now.
Now the disclosures for me: worst city 21.8 mpg/ best highway with super cetane in Germany: 34.9. No, I don't have a heavy foot and I do drive like an egg between me and the pedal.
Last edited by TPAbnz; 08-24-2005 at 06:54 PM.
#18
Newbie
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
'06 BMW 530i, '03 BMW M3
Originally Posted by TPAbnz
Well, please test drive first . . . but I will let you know that two clients of mine (with substantial resources who could have otherwise bought an E500 or probably any other similarly priced car) BOUGHT a CDI after a spin in my car. OK, Karl, I did select "S" for the tranny mode.
Now the disclosures for me: worst city 21.8 mpg/ best highway with super cetane in Germany: 34.9. No, I don't have a heavy foot and I do drive like an egg between me and the pedal.
Now the disclosures for me: worst city 21.8 mpg/ best highway with super cetane in Germany: 34.9. No, I don't have a heavy foot and I do drive like an egg between me and the pedal.
#19
Originally Posted by reb03
CDI, here I come. Crude was up another $1.70 to $67.50 a barrel today. Since I'm in the market for a more comfortable family sedan and I drive 20k miles a year I just can't see getting anything else right now.
If you buy a CDI and average 30 MPG. Fuel Cost per gal: $3. 15,000 miles per year. Annual fuel cost. $1500
If you buy a AMG E55. Average 15 MPG (which is really low - I avg 18 MPG with a very heavy foot) 15,000 miles per year $3 Gal gas. Annual fuel cost $3000.
So the gas E350 and E500 are somewhere in between.
My point is that the best to worst extreme is $1500 per year - $125 a year. That is not much to me, it is probably huge to others. I completely understand the merits of the CDI, the longevity, the cool factor, etc. But just considered the simple fuel cost.
It never makes since to sell a car to get one with better mileage. You will lose more on a trade than save on gas.
This is not to start anything, just an interesting observation (rationale for owning a gas hog - but a sweet one).
#20
Newbie
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
'06 BMW 530i, '03 BMW M3
Originally Posted by E55 and 993
It never makes since to sell a car to get one with better mileage. You will lose more on a trade than save on gas.
This is not to start anything, just an interesting observation (rationale for owning a gas hog - but a sweet one).
This is not to start anything, just an interesting observation (rationale for owning a gas hog - but a sweet one).
#21
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: FL410
Posts: 4,968
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
'05 E320 CDI, '08 BMW X5 4.8i, '11 Duramax 2500HD
Had I not needed to buy my mother an E350 as I had promised to do when I was just a kid.. (And I keep my word!).. I may have gotten an E55, since I really love the W211 body and wanted fast performance too. Plus the 55 comes with a lot of nice stuff as standard. I got my mom's E350 with the intention that I'd get an E500 for myself and stay under $110,000.. but standard options apart (Leather, Airmatic) the CDI is the better car since in terms of resale the MB diesels are king, and more over if you plan to keep the car for a long time, the MB diesels are also the most reliable MB's traditionally. If you equip a CDI with the leather, and Airmatic DC of the 500, you're in the same price spot, but I believe you get the better motor with the CDI. And after a $1200 Renntech tune up, you're driving 411 ft/lb of torque around... that's E500 performance with Accord reliability and economy.
![off topic](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/ot.gif)
E55 and 993... I'll be free to meet for lunch on the 29th.. sound good? if so, I can tell ATCPHX, and see if he's wants to join us at the Biltmore.
![off topic](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/ot.gif)
E55 and 993... I'll be free to meet for lunch on the 29th.. sound good? if so, I can tell ATCPHX, and see if he's wants to join us at the Biltmore.
#22
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: THE NAPA VALLEY, CA
Posts: 1,439
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Build date 2-04 E500
Originally Posted by reb03
CDI, here I come. Crude was up another $1.70 to $67.50 a barrel today. Since I'm in the market for a more comfortable family sedan and I drive 20k miles a year I just can't see getting anything else right now.
Good luck with your purchase.
#23
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: FL410
Posts: 4,968
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
'05 E320 CDI, '08 BMW X5 4.8i, '11 Duramax 2500HD
Originally Posted by HELL ONA HARLEY
I'm not sure if saving $$$ on fuel should be your first consideration when purchasing a diesel.... I think the longevity of the engine would be my first consideration... In the S.F bayarea diesel is now more than gas.... I've said this before in a thread about a year ago and I see now its becoming fact... Diesel WILL be more at the pump and when its reformulated soon they are sure to bend you over even more..... At least more than we gasoline consumers.
Good luck with your purchase.
Good luck with your purchase.
#24
Super Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 819
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
06 320E CDI, Porsche 911 C2, Pontiac Montana
My '05 CDI averaged 30mpg with 75% suburban driving.
I wanted to see how "high" the mpg display would go so on a loooooong downhill, I reset the display and I got 4.1 liters per 100 km which translates to about 60 mpg.
Back in the early eighties, I had a diesel Rabbit and it routinely got over 55 mpg. While it was great on fuel, people could hear you coming a mile away. I went on a trip to Pennsylvania with it with four people and in some of the hills I had to use 3rd gear.
I am sure that Mercedes will have the diesel/electric hybrid option for E-class in the next four years. It makes too much sense not to. I would expect that a four cylinder diesel with a electric motor "support" will accelarate just quick as our cars now and probably get 45mpg. The only difference would be that you be "limited" to 120 mph top speed. As if that matters in NA.
I wanted to see how "high" the mpg display would go so on a loooooong downhill, I reset the display and I got 4.1 liters per 100 km which translates to about 60 mpg.
Back in the early eighties, I had a diesel Rabbit and it routinely got over 55 mpg. While it was great on fuel, people could hear you coming a mile away. I went on a trip to Pennsylvania with it with four people and in some of the hills I had to use 3rd gear.
I am sure that Mercedes will have the diesel/electric hybrid option for E-class in the next four years. It makes too much sense not to. I would expect that a four cylinder diesel with a electric motor "support" will accelarate just quick as our cars now and probably get 45mpg. The only difference would be that you be "limited" to 120 mph top speed. As if that matters in NA.
#25
Senior Member
Originally Posted by HELL ONA HARLEY
I'm not sure if saving $$$ on fuel should be your first consideration when purchasing a diesel.... I think the longevity of the engine would be my first consideration... In the S.F bayarea diesel is now more than gas.... I've said this before in a thread about a year ago and I see now its becoming fact... Diesel WILL be more at the pump and when its reformulated soon they are sure to bend you over even more..... At least more than we gasoline consumers.
Good luck with your purchase.
Good luck with your purchase.
I wouldn't be to quick to order the KY and some latex. Check this out:
http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/oog/info/twip/twip.asp
Now, here is the good news. If, indeed, refiners are having difficulty processing more crude oil, this is likely to be temporary, and as these problems are corrected, their ability to refine more crude oil should increase. Often, U.S. total petroleum product demand peaks in the heart of winter, as heating oil demand surges. But refiners typically peak their runs in the summer, as they produce gasoline to meet peak demand for that product, while also producing heating oil to build up supplies for the winter. And, even though refiners have not produced as much recently as might have been expected, distillate fuel (which includes both diesel fuel and heating oil) inventories, measured in absolute terms, are above the average range for this time of year. Moreover, refiners will be able to draw from crude oil inventories that are currently well above the average range should there be a need to produce extra heating oil this upcoming winter. Thus, while crude oil prices are high now, the recent counter-seasonal build in crude oil inventories should keep prices from being as high this coming winter as they might be without this extra crude oil inventory.
Many discussions can come from this topic. Biodiesel, engine longevity, decrease in future Sulfur/CO/PM etc... ULSD will probably add 5-7cents/gal. Surely not enough to make us bend over :p