E-Class (W211) 2003-2009

2006 E-Class

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 06-04-2006, 01:34 PM
  #1  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
heatfan_08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2006 E-Class

Hey Guys:

Im new here and I have a few questions regarding the E class and was wondering if any of you guys can help me out.

Im currently in the market for an E, but I'm stuck between the 350 and 500. In the 350, does both driver and front passenger have memory seats? what are the differences between the 350 and 500 besides engine size and climate control? I've checked mbusa but cannot get a definitive answer on the memory seats.

Also how do you rate your E and what model is it?


Thomas
Old 06-04-2006, 01:52 PM
  #2  
Super Member
 
cyclerider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Oregon
Posts: 822
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Harley-Davidson
All E-Class have memory seats for both driver and passenger. The 500 comes standard with airmatic suspension and full leather interior, and does not charge extra for metallic paint. There should be large discounts for the E500, since the 07 E550 will be here very soon.
Old 06-04-2006, 02:22 PM
  #3  
Super Member
 
TPAbnz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 996
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
2017 E300W
You can compare specs, equipment, etc., here:

http://www.mbusa.com/models/class-ov...e=e_class_main
Old 06-04-2006, 11:50 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
khaug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Michigan, USA
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'05 E320 CDI, '07 VW Touareg V10 TDI, 2007 Porsche GT3
Nothing wrong with the E320 (although the '03 MY is probably best avoided).

Also consider the E320 CDI diesel. Not your father's diesel, and the combination of power and economy is unique!
Old 06-05-2006, 12:15 AM
  #5  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
W211 Ryda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,783
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 3 Posts
2004 E320
If I could do it all over again, I would get the E500. You could never have enough HP! Although, I get awesome gas mileage with my E320!!!
Old 06-05-2006, 09:36 PM
  #6  
Junior Member
 
D.Schlichting's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2018 E300, 2014 C300
Even before my wife totaled our 2000 Cadillac Seville, I had pretty much written off the purchase of the new STS and had shopped the W211. I was extremely happy with the 4.6l Northstar engine of the Cadillac and so considered only an E500. One thing led to another and I drove the E350 and was totally satisfied with the performance. When we bought our E350 (MAY05) the price difference was $7,000--something I could not justify. I think the Cadillac platforms are somewhat heaver than the W211, so really need that V8. Unless you're getting a great deal on an E500 or have a fixation on such higher power output, I suspect you'll find the E350 acceptable.
Old 06-06-2006, 01:55 AM
  #7  
Member
 
gvaughn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Duarte, CA
Posts: 177
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2006 E500
I originally was going to get the E350...but eventually felt that the E500 was worth the extra price - I think it depends on whether you're planning on buying the base model or adding a lot of options, as I ended up doing.
Old 06-06-2006, 09:31 AM
  #8  
Super Member
 
JimPurdy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Mansfield, TX
Posts: 693
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
11 ML350W2 / 17 GLC300
I think a lot depends on your expectations and driving style. I prefer the E320/E350 for the fuel economy. I took a 150 mile house hunting trip in our E320 Sunday afternoon in 100 degree heat. This trip was 60 mile each way and 30 miles going from development to development with a lot of idling. The trip computer showed over 28 mpg when we arrived at the destination and 25.4 mpg when we got home. There are very few times when I would be willing to pay the mpg penalty for the extra horsepower of the v8.
Old 06-06-2006, 09:35 AM
  #9  
Super Member
 
cyclerider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Oregon
Posts: 822
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Harley-Davidson
Originally Posted by JimPurdy
. . . There are very few times when I would be willing to pay the mpg penalty for the extra horsepower of the v8.
I'll bet one of those times is when you are in the left lane of a 2 lane highway passing a large truck.
Old 06-06-2006, 01:42 PM
  #10  
Member
 
gvaughn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Duarte, CA
Posts: 177
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2006 E500
Originally Posted by JimPurdy
I think a lot depends on your expectations and driving style. I prefer the E320/E350 for the fuel economy. I took a 150 mile house hunting trip in our E320 Sunday afternoon in 100 degree heat. This trip was 60 mile each way and 30 miles going from development to development with a lot of idling. The trip computer showed over 28 mpg when we arrived at the destination and 25.4 mpg when we got home. There are very few times when I would be willing to pay the mpg penalty for the extra horsepower of the v8.
If fuel economy is a major factor then the E320 CDI is probably the choice to make...
Old 06-06-2006, 06:27 PM
  #11  
Super Member
 
JimPurdy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Mansfield, TX
Posts: 693
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
11 ML350W2 / 17 GLC300
Had the CDI been available in the US when we bought the '03, we would be driving one now. The only time I wish I had the v8 is when I wish I had the E55 to blow off a Corvette. Passing a truck going up a hill isn't a problem - the gas version E320 will still get you well into the expensive speeding ticket range before you pull back in.
Old 06-06-2006, 08:17 PM
  #12  
Junior Member
 
D.Schlichting's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2018 E300, 2014 C300
When it comes to typical highway passing, I'm always impressed at the acceleration of my E350 from more or less 55mph into the 85mph range. Again, my experience has been with Northstar-powered Cadillacs, and I think the E350 is quicker.
BTW, we drove West this past Christmas --all the way to Denver--covering 4,100 miles and averaged 24.5mpg. This is cruising in 65-75mph --and ours is a 4-MATIC.
Old 06-06-2006, 09:19 PM
  #13  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
mmgrad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: So Cal
Posts: 5,289
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
W213 '17 E43 ///AMG - W211, W208 no more
Originally Posted by W211 Ryda
If I could do it all over again, I would get the E500. You could never have enough HP! Although, I get awesome gas mileage with my E320!!!
i agree word for word...
Old 06-06-2006, 10:19 PM
  #14  
Junior Member
 
farrbar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
E350W4
Did you consider the 4-matic option?

Depending on what area you live in, you may need to also debate the 4 matic vs. 2wd question. I have a 2006 E350 - 4 matic. Having owned many high powered cars including several Vipers and a Bentley with the 6.75 Turbo, I was surprised at the pep of the E350 in brief acceleration situations. For my budget the debate was either 4 matic vs. V8, and I feel like I made the right choice for the Chicago winters. I will admit in certain situations I would like more power, but that is just for pleasure and not a safety issue. I would think either a 2006 E350 or 500 should be priced at 3-5k below INVOICE.

Good Luck.

Farrbar

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: 2006 E-Class



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:59 PM.