E-Class (W211) 2003-2009

CDI owners running fuel additives?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Oct 2, 2008 | 01:56 PM
  #1  
Dieselpowr's Avatar
Thread Starter
Almost a Member!
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
From: Michigan, West Side
2005 E320 CDI
CDI owners running fuel additives?

Hey guys,

Just wondering if any of you are running additives. Diesel fuel additive to help increase the offsets of the new diesel with increased lubrication? I wonder if it helps or not? I have run a few tanks of the additive and I am not sure if I can tell a difference or not. If there is one it's not major. Not like when you run premium in your car after running low octane for a while.

Either way, just wondering if anyone was seeing a benefit or if it's something to avoid.


Thanks.
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2008 | 06:58 PM
  #2  
pinebaron's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,252
Likes: 18
From: Blaine, WA
07 E320 Bluetec
With so much torque in my 07 Bluetec, I have never felt the need for additives.
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2008 | 12:36 AM
  #3  
rbordel's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
From: Texas
05 E320 CDI
I've regularly use Power Service Diesel Kleen® +Cetane Boost®, mainly for the Cetane boost it provides. Seems to make the engine idle more quietly.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2009 | 01:40 PM
  #4  
cablvr's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 252
Likes: 1
From: Central PA, Jersey Shore
'16 S550, '03 & '15 GMC Sierra 1500, '17 C300
Originally Posted by rbordel
I've regularly use Power Service Diesel Kleen® +Cetane Boost®, mainly for the Cetane boost it provides. Seems to make the engine idle more quietly.
What kind of frequency for use of PSDK?
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2009 | 01:52 PM
  #5  
TMAllison's Avatar
Super Member
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 835
Likes: 2
From: Bay Area, CA
09' E320
The lubricity of ULSD, per the ASTM spec, remained the same as it was for LSD.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2009 | 01:53 PM
  #6  
philfna's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
From: California / Hawaii
GL350-Bluetec P1
Per MBUSA additives are not recommended, and there is a real possibility of voiding your warranty especially with Bluetec.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2009 | 10:37 PM
  #7  
khaug's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
From: Michigan, USA
'05 E320 CDI, '07 VW Touareg V10 TDI, 2007 Porsche GT3
Originally Posted by philfna
Per MBUSA additives are not recommended, and there is a real possibility of voiding your warranty especially with Bluetec.


What he said!

My CDI starts and runs fine, even in the coldest weather. Using Sunoco diesel, it idles quietly. Dunno why I'd want to dump any questionable substance in the fuel tank.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2009 | 11:11 PM
  #8  
philfna's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
From: California / Hawaii
GL350-Bluetec P1
Although the Power Service website claims they will not void the manufacturer's warranty. I don't believe they can make claims for Mercedes.
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2009 | 08:25 AM
  #9  
Boulder GT3's Avatar
Member
15 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 222
Likes: 3
E320 CDI, SL550, clk550
I've tried everything in my trucks and never, saw, felt, or could measure any improvement by using the common additives. There are some white papers that say lubricity can be improved. Two exceptions: Maybe an additive at <-20 or if you have an algae problem. Hard to imagine getting algae in a 22 gallon tank that gets common use but I guess it could happen. Some of the additives smell so nasty I can't imagine what chemicals they are. I wouldn't put anything in the Benz tank.

The very big deal with common rails is to use the best fuel possible. The Benz filters down to 2-4 Microns so it doesn't take much to gum up the works. The best way to get good fuel is to buy from a station that is pumping a lot.

Having said all of that, I think much of the concern about diesel fuel is overblown. I've got a boat with common rail diesel motors. You typically run a pretty high risk of bad fuel around the water due to rusty tanks and so on. Because of that, the boat has a more elaborate filter system. Before fuel gets to the engine, if goes through these filters called Racors that have a clear bowl with a spinner in it that separates contamination and water. You can see anything that comes in and gets caught. Nada, nix, nothing has been trapped (knock on wood). They always stay clean as a whistle even in that environment.

I think the fuel and supply lines are better than they used to be and good from the pump as is.

Last edited by Boulder GT3; Jan 18, 2009 at 12:49 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2009 | 10:30 AM
  #10  
philfna's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
From: California / Hawaii
GL350-Bluetec P1
Yeah the only issue I had was when my wife had me stop at a small town to get gas, and I used a no name station. I suspect he bad gas issue. She said use that one no one's there...there was a reason bad gas.
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2009 | 12:31 PM
  #11  
Polar Bear's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,691
Likes: 142
W221 S600, W220 S55 AMG Kompressor, W124 300E, W140 S320, W210 E3204M W164 ML320 Bluetec
Originally Posted by Boulder GT3

I think the fuel and supply lines are better than they used to be and good from the pump as it.
Plus the fuel filter change interval is much longer than it used to be. On the W123 300D there was no way to run 20k miles without running into issues and power loss. Overall the newer fuel system (and of course the fuel) seems to be much better.
Reply

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:23 PM.