2006 E320 CDI trip impressions
I'm still surprised that I'm getting 500 miles per tank or so in mixed driving and it's 18 gallons to top it off. It's nice after getting 13MPG and about 200 miles per tank in the Rover this replaces.
Around town to 1500 RPMS it feels like it pulls maybe 5-10% stronger. Nothing huge, it just runs a little crisper. Phillfna described it as a cure for a mild cold and I think that is a pretty good description.
I was on about 200 miles of 2 lane roads today. The improvement in passing power is huge. Nice 60-90MPH roll on. I wouldn't be surprised if it would run dead even with my wife's SL550. Big improvement and I love turbo whoosh passing cars.
I'm not sure I buy the whole "learning" thing that MB pitches about ECU's. Who cares? The box is simple and a keeper.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
I drove an ML Bluetec and I think the motor fits well there. I do think the KD box for an ML would be a huge improvement. With the ML's extra pounds and larger hole in the wind the KD would be a nice add.
The reduced fuel does help emissions but the diesels I've run through strict emissions in Colorado still pass with ease. MB has them tuned for low emissions. This is a whole different topic.
The tweaks are common with over the road trucks much to the chagrin of the EPA.
The reduced fuel does help emissions but the diesels I've run through strict emissions in Colorado still pass with ease. MB has them tuned for low emissions. This is a whole different topic.
The tweaks are common with over the road trucks much to the chagrin of the EPA.
Taken to the extremes the government will install speed detection devices in all new cars. Every time you hit 100 mph $100.00 will immediately be debited to your bank account by Uncle Sam. Imagine doing it 10 times on the highway and you are out of pocket $1,000.00. The deficit will be erased and a lot of Americans go bankrupt.
And that is the way emission control should be everywhere.
If you love trees. Walk don't drive. Dig?
And that is the way emission control should be everywhere.
If you love trees. Walk don't drive. Dig?
I don't think urea will be the future - I am personally not interested in the technology, but I am glad they are researching cleaner emissions and are able to meet stringent requirements even using urea injection. I think in a few years we will see that go away and will have more advanced exhaust and direct injection technology that will get more MPG and power at the same time reducing emissions.
Anyways, to get back on topic, I recently contemplated buying a new Jetta TDI b/c I heard you could get 60+mpg! I am seriously considering the new Prius hybrid. Since I drive a lot, I should really do more to emit fewer carbon emissions.
Here is an interesting article for Boulder GT3--if you don't drive your gas guzzlers too much, don't feel so bad about it.
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...errari_feature
The author of the article is kind of kidding, but it the point he makes is valid.
I just bought an E320 CDI for the better mileage and torque, like a lot of people do. As for this "carbon foot print" stuff, go take a look at a book entitled "The Deniers: The World Renowned Scientists Who Stood Up Against Global Warming Hysteria, Political Persecution, and Fraud**And those who are too fearful to do so" by a Canadian anti-nuke advocate and environmentalist and you will see that the Obama/Gore/NYT-driven anti-CO2 hysteria is, at best, unfounded and unsubtantiated and, at worst, a horrible distortion of science.
Drive a high mpg car to save money and petroleum, but do not kid yourself, you are not saving the planet or preventing global warming (even if it exists).
Which makes more sense? Definitely Bigfoot.
240D. This is my first diesel benz and I'm honestly hooked. My next Benz will definitely be an '05 or '06 CDI!! 







