E-Class (W211) 2003-2009

E500 vs E350

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 03-28-2009 | 11:41 AM
  #51  
Nickelmania-Dal's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Benz-O-Rama
Mine is. Before header and exhaust upgrade, I was running 13.49@102.5

E500 Take off

E500 Drive By


E500. Any questions?
Benz-O-Rama, that was a great you tube! My E350 cant do that.
Old 03-28-2009 | 11:45 AM
  #52  
Nickelmania-Dal's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Zax63
have you driven both cars? It aint the half second during floor to the throttle acceleration. It's the torque around town, part throttle application. Numbers on paper have very little to do with the real world driving experience. Little known fact - the marketing slogan "I shoulda had a V-8" has nothing to do with vegetable juice.
No I have not driven the V8. I will have to try a V8 when I turn this one in. Have you tried the newer V6? It really is quick for a V6 and it actually sounds good at full throttle.
Old 03-28-2009 | 11:49 AM
  #53  
Nickelmania-Dal's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by K-A




C350 is a solid, quick and durable car that handles well.

However it's lack of refinement, luxury, and sound proofing make it very un-M-B like to me, I've driven quite a few and thought besides the pretty nice aesthetic look, the austere interior and overall experience of the car was pretty shockingly less than desirable. Different animal then the E, but again, different strokes for different folks.
K-A, I agree with you. C350 seemed like lower quality. Not saying it was bad but reminded me of a nice Honda Accord
Old 03-28-2009 | 12:34 PM
  #54  
dvmak's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 189
Likes: 1
From: New Jersey
'06 E500 Flint Grey - Charcoal
Yep .. like I said earlier I drove the C350 and thought it was a great car but the E-series still has a much smoother ride .. hence the $20K price difference!!!!

Nickelmania-Dal,

I have driven the newer E350 with 268HP and it is a great car .. good pickup .. smooth .. but the E500 still 'feels' more powerful ...
Old 03-28-2009 | 02:02 PM
  #55  
Benz-O-Rama's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 8,137
Likes: 25
From: Maryland
Eurocharged 2004 E500, Eurocharged ECU/TCU 2005 SL600, 2010 Caddy SwaggerWagon
Originally Posted by Nickelmania-Dal
Benz-O-Rama, that was a great you tube! My E350 cant do that.
Thanks. Not a whole lot of 500's that can do that either.
Old 03-28-2009 | 06:42 PM
  #56  
K-A's Avatar
K-A
Out Of Control!!
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 10,557
Likes: 18
From: Earth
Porsche Macan S SportDesign / Ex M-B's: 11 & 10 & 06 E350's, 02 S500
Originally Posted by Nickelmania-Dal
K-A, I agree with you. C350 seemed like lower quality. Not saying it was bad but reminded me of a nice Honda Accord
Agreed.

Originally Posted by Nickelmania-Dal
No I have not driven the V8. I will have to try a V8 when I turn this one in. Have you tried the newer V6? It really is quick for a V6 and it actually sounds good at full throttle.
And agreed. I had the V8 in my S, and it's power delivery is remarkable, a perfect engine for a Luxury car, doesn't ever get too loud and screamy, enough torque delivery to never feel like your lagging or to force it to get too loud. Linear and smooth, I wonder if the E550's motor is as smooth as it's a 4V and more performance driven. The 3.5 V6 is remarkable indeed, sounds great at WOT (and I always hated the V6 sound), whilst still being quiet and delivering its torque early enough to not wind-up excessively to get moving.
Old 03-28-2009 | 07:00 PM
  #57  
Polar Bear's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,691
Likes: 140
W221 S600, W220 S55 AMG Kompressor, W124 300E, W140 S320, W210 E3204M W164 ML320 Bluetec
The 550 engine (from my experience with it when it was released in the S550 in mid 2006) was that it is much like the V8 from the W210 E55. It had plenty of power and really moved the car good.
Old 03-28-2009 | 08:16 PM
  #58  
benzlvr2500's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
From: Rancho Cucamonga, CA
gets me from point A-B
i see guys...so most of you would say that C350 is good, but its not as smooth as an E...if only i had money id get my dad an E and get myself a C...stupid economy
Old 03-28-2009 | 08:54 PM
  #59  
Polar Bear's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,691
Likes: 140
W221 S600, W220 S55 AMG Kompressor, W124 300E, W140 S320, W210 E3204M W164 ML320 Bluetec
The C350 is a nice car IMO. A bit small, but a good solid daily driver. The MM package and P2 package is a must.

I just wish they offered Keyless-Go in the US - they do not, but the do in Canada. Strange.

Keyless-Go is one of those options that is hard to do without once you have had it. I guess I carry too much junk in my pockets and digging out the keys is a pain.
Old 03-28-2009 | 09:49 PM
  #60  
Nickelmania-Dal's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by benzlvr2500
i see guys...so most of you would say that C350 is good, but its not as smooth as an E...if only i had money id get my dad an E and get myself a C...stupid economy
As far as the engine goes, I would say the C350 is as "smooth" as the E350. Its the C350 interior that feels and looks a bit cheap for a Mercedes that I dont like.
Old 03-28-2009 | 10:07 PM
  #61  
Polar Bear's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,691
Likes: 140
W221 S600, W220 S55 AMG Kompressor, W124 300E, W140 S320, W210 E3204M W164 ML320 Bluetec
Originally Posted by Nickelmania-Dal
As far as the engine goes, I would say the C350 is as "smooth" as the E350. Its the C350 interior that feels and looks a bit cheap for a Mercedes that I dont like.
Yes - but that appears to be the direction MB is going. I like some features of the W212, but I am not crazy about the steering wheel being the same as the W204 (in the pics I have seen). I also don't care for all of the chrome switches in the W221. I think the W124 and W210 has some of the most attractive interior of recent Mercedes-Benz vehicles. Well, really many of the cars from that era were nice. I really like the W203 interior (2005+) and thought it looked much better than the W204, but the W204 has the better technology to go with it which makes it a little more attractive now. I have always thought of the W203 (no offense intended to anyone) as more of a female's car. The W204 could go either way.

I do really like the 164 interior too - I think MB did an excellent job on that.

Nothing really stands out in the W212 yet - I don't care for the rear-end. The front end is OK, but I really will miss the oval headlamps. I don't care for the rear doors (looks too Japanese). But - it is an MB so I feel sure it will drive excellent and perhaps I will like it more when I see it in person. I don't expect to own one anytime soon with the state of the economy.
Old 03-29-2009 | 01:06 AM
  #62  
Nickelmania-Dal's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Polar Bear
Yes - but that appears to be the direction MB is going. I like some features of the W212, but I am not crazy about the steering wheel being the same as the W204 (in the pics I have seen). I also don't care for all of the chrome switches in the W221. I think the W124 and W210 has some of the most attractive interior of recent Mercedes-Benz vehicles. Well, really many of the cars from that era were nice. I really like the W203 interior (2005+) and thought it looked much better than the W204, but the W204 has the better technology to go with it which makes it a little more attractive now. I have always thought of the W203 (no offense intended to anyone) as more of a female's car. The W204 could go either way.

I do really like the 164 interior too - I think MB did an excellent job on that.

Nothing really stands out in the W212 yet - I don't care for the rear-end. The front end is OK, but I really will miss the oval headlamps. I don't care for the rear doors (looks too Japanese). But - it is an MB so I feel sure it will drive excellent and perhaps I will like it more when I see it in person. I don't expect to own one anytime soon with the state of the economy.
Good thought about MB direction. Here is a question....Would Mercedes be more prestigious if it only had 3 models like the old days?? How would Mercedes be looked upon if they only had the SL, E and S to choose from?
Old 03-29-2009 | 10:15 AM
  #63  
Polar Bear's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,691
Likes: 140
W221 S600, W220 S55 AMG Kompressor, W124 300E, W140 S320, W210 E3204M W164 ML320 Bluetec
Originally Posted by Nickelmania-Dal
Good thought about MB direction. Here is a question....Would Mercedes be more prestigious if it only had 3 models like the old days?? How would Mercedes be looked upon if they only had the SL, E and S to choose from?
Yes and if the E was more expensive (relative to other cars) I am sure it would. If it were the early/mid 1980's, many people that own these cars now (me included) could not afford them if the price increased like others vehicles, but relative to other cars, MB has been pretty flat or actually decreased. My 1983 300D was $34,000 new. That was very expensive for the time.

With that said, MB is a corporation like any other and is in this business to make a profit. I am not so sure they care about being "prestigious" as much as they do making a profit. I am sure they had rather flood the market with more models and drop down a little in price and become more affordable to sell more units.

For example, year over year for at least the about the past 15 years (last year being an exception) the sales have increased for MBUSA.. And one would argue they have produced some of the poorest quality cars in this time frame.

They are really riding on the image they created in the 1970s and 1980s for sales which carried them through the slump - I think they are probably coming out of that now and producing higher quality cars. But as long as they are selling more units - I think that is what matters most to them.

One indication of this (which I guess is a pet peeve of mine) is the use of "blanks" in the interior. In the past - with the W210, W140, W220 and before, there were no "blanks" anywhere to be found in the passenger cars in the US. Starting with the W211, if you didn't have a rear sunshade, heated seats, ventilated seats, etc., there were several blanks staring you in the face below the radio.

On the W210, if the car did not have an option, it had a different wood panel. While much more expensive to manufacture and keep parts on hand, I expect this kind of quality and attention to detail in a car like MB.

The W212 will be worse. I know one of those buttons below the radio is for the auxiliary heater. If the past repeats itself, that option will NOT be available in the US. So that means that all W212s will have a blank on the right side of the set of buttons below the radio. Same for the current W209 (CLK) and W203.

All MBs always had their "swiches" surrounded by wood trim in their mid to highline cars. It appears this has gone away in the W212 - all plastic.
Old 03-29-2009 | 04:21 PM
  #64  
gaazmon's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,003
Likes: 48
From: Los Angeles
2009 SL550 Roadster Diamond White, 2008 CLK550 Coupe Obsidian Black
Yes, I agree, less models would be better. All they would need is the E, E-coupe, S, S-coupe, and SL. Well they are already getting ride of the CLK for the E-coupe and the CL is being changed into the S-coupe.

Another thing that pissed me off during Christmas time was that they had sooooo many MB ads on the radio and tv. I thought, WTF, I didn't know I bought a Honda or Toyota or Kia. I was ready to call MBUSA and be like WTF is this??? There was no way near just as many BMW or Audi commercials.
Old 06-12-2010 | 07:45 PM
  #65  
genius's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
2003 c240 4matic
Originally Posted by benzlvr2500
but does the 05-06 E500 have that SBC bullcrap?? i haven't heard many good things about that
what is SBC?
and what does it do?
Old 06-12-2010 | 07:52 PM
  #66  
genius's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
2003 c240 4matic
Originally Posted by gaazmon
Ya, that 17/25 for the E500 is the old standard. The new for city is like 15. We have a 02 CL500 and in the city the thing isn't that good, like 14. The E350 will get you about 17-18 in the city. My 320 gets between 18-20 sometimes 21 in the city. Hwy wise, I think they are pretty close to each other.

The performance difference isn't that big between the 350 and 500, that's why they came out with the 550. However, it's the torque in the 500 that makes the difference: 330 vs. the 350's 258. Hp wise: the 500 is 300 and the 350 is 268. But remember, the 350 comes with the newer engine build (i.e. 4 valves instead of 3 valves system), better intake system, etc. Also, I had a C350 loaner once and it was quite fast.

The looks of the 07 will stand out way more than the looks of the older 500.

Back to quality, the 07 350 will probably be better off than the 05 500.

Handling, the 350 is quite firm. My uncle has one and even complains about it. The 500 gives you the option of soft or sporty. Also, IMO, with the aimatic in sport mode, even sport II mode, the car is firm, but yet it is very comfortable. I really like the airmatic.

Honestly drive both. Another thing is, from my research when I was looking at cars, the 03 - 06 models where harder to find with options. With the 07+s, almost all of them have the sport package, some have the AMG sport sport package (09's only offer AMG sport package, not regular sport package). Also, a lot of the 07+ have the P1 package. Only thing is P2 (xenons, keyless go) are hard to find. Another thing: the 500 has leather. The 07+ 350's have leather as an option, another hard feature to come by, but no biggie.

"The 07+ 350's have leather as an option, another hard feature to come by, but no biggie"

What do u mean with leather? what else would it be?
Old 06-12-2010 | 07:55 PM
  #67  
mike vee's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 131
Likes: 1
2005 E500
i think there was an issue with SBC brakes but there is a free fix at any dealer. when i got my e500 i took it to the dealer and they did a bunch of free recall stuff.
Old 06-13-2010 | 08:23 AM
  #68  
559EVO's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 450
Likes: 1
From: Los Angeles
2005 C55
Three months later, did the guy even buy a car?
Old 06-13-2010 | 04:56 PM
  #69  
gaazmon's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,003
Likes: 48
From: Los Angeles
2009 SL550 Roadster Diamond White, 2008 CLK550 Coupe Obsidian Black
Originally Posted by genius
What do u mean with leather? what else would it be?
mb tex (leatherette/vinyl)
Old 05-29-2015 | 08:00 PM
  #70  
jrocco71's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
2005 Mercedes-Benz E500 4Matic
Wrong!

Originally Posted by DerekACS
My suggestion would be that you look for a 07-08 E350. The technical advantages of the updated 07-09 E Class are numerous compared to the 05s and the resale of the E350 will be better down the road than any E500 or E550, given that the current US government is so keen to slap on extra carbon taxes.
I think it is a safe bet that the Obama Administration will soon do much to discourage consumption of fossil fuels with the imposition of additional fuel taxes, so I would think twice about the purchase of any car with a V8 engine.
-- Almost everything stated above is backwards. And I also recently considered upgrading to the newer '07 E350 or E550. But the only one of this series of cars truly worth upgrading to is the E55 AMG. Now, it is true that the newer E350 is more technologically advanced and definitely enjoys better fuel economy due to it's smaller engine size but the reality is that the E350 resale value in the future will be no better (and in fact, probably worse) than an earlier E500. The simple fact is this: That aluminum Mercedes-Benz 5.0L V-8 engine is a rock solid, time tested 4 cam/32 valve design with a long, rich history of incredible longevity, durability, reliability and high-performance under the hood of everything from the E-class to the S- and SL classes. I've personally seen examples with nearly 300,000 miles on them that still run & handle like a nearly brand-new car with a tenth of the mileage. And the all-wheel-drive (4Matic) versions are even more desirable, are showing higher resale values, and handle better than any 5-Series (528i/535i/550i) I have ever owned or driven. After four BMWs and nine Mercedes-Benz vehicles since 1994, I simply refuse to drive anything other than a Mercedes-Benz or Lexus LS or GS at this point.

If you're going to do anything otherwise, upgrade even further! Go up to the newest body style E350/550 with it's stunningly gorgeous front facia, featuring those tilt-mounted triangular headlamps and that beautiful new front grille.

My daily driver is an '05 M-B E500 4Matic and my wife drives our 2006 Lexus LS430. Aside from my other Mercedes (a 1985 300 CD turbo diesel) my current vehicles are the best two cars I've ever owned.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: E500 vs E350



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:32 PM.