Retfitting Navigation in a car with base stereo.
Thread Starter
Newbie
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: USA
2006 E55
Retfitting Navigation in a car with base stereo.
I'm considering installing Navigation in two 2006 E350's. Both cars have base stereos. Do i need to install comand? Right now im just playing around with the idea and im just trying to get an idea of what is involved. Any info would be helpfull.
Thanks
Thanks
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 5,017
Likes: 16
From: Ft. Lauderdale Area, USA
2015 ML 350
"COMAND" is the name of the headunit. It has a NAV, Phone, SAT buttons & a CD slot on it right? (That doesn't mean anything of course... the NAV is in the trunk up thru 2008.) There are posts on the Forum that have step by step instructions.
Its really not worth it at this stage... A) how long are you going to keep the cars? B) Garmin offers a vastly superior unit which will thrill you rather than a vastly expensive MB unit that will amuse you with its limitations.
Also garmin has a nice, heavy, non sliding non bean bag dash top "mount" for their units. You'll find that you don't use a NAV unit as much as you predict. (Wife has this in her BMW 128 Conv: http://reviews.cnet.com/8301-13746_7-10461594-48.html
That being said, if I was ordering a car, I'd order the factory unit... but you're not ordering a new car.
Honest opinion.
Its really not worth it at this stage... A) how long are you going to keep the cars? B) Garmin offers a vastly superior unit which will thrill you rather than a vastly expensive MB unit that will amuse you with its limitations.
Also garmin has a nice, heavy, non sliding non bean bag dash top "mount" for their units. You'll find that you don't use a NAV unit as much as you predict. (Wife has this in her BMW 128 Conv: http://reviews.cnet.com/8301-13746_7-10461594-48.html
That being said, if I was ordering a car, I'd order the factory unit... but you're not ordering a new car.
Honest opinion.
Last edited by Barry45RPM; Aug 27, 2010 at 01:07 PM.
Member
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 234
Likes: 2
2006 E320 CDI
Absolutely right!
You are absolutely right. The factory navigation system in the W211 is terrible...out-classed in every way by any $100 after-market gps and wildly out-classed by any $200 Garmin or TomTom system.
You are also dead-on about the Garmin bean-bag mount. It is excellent and puts the gps up at eye-level, not dangerously low on the dash like the factory unit.
I have the factory gps in my 2006 E320 and it absolutely "sucks". I use a refurb Garmin 680 and it is MUCH better (cost $175 a couple of years ago).
The W211 navigation system is something MB should be deeply ashamed of ever having put in a car.
- nopcbs
You are also dead-on about the Garmin bean-bag mount. It is excellent and puts the gps up at eye-level, not dangerously low on the dash like the factory unit.
I have the factory gps in my 2006 E320 and it absolutely "sucks". I use a refurb Garmin 680 and it is MUCH better (cost $175 a couple of years ago).
The W211 navigation system is something MB should be deeply ashamed of ever having put in a car.
- nopcbs
"COMAND" is the name of the headunit. It has a NAV, Phone, SAT buttons & a CD slot on it right? (That doesn't mean anything of course... the NAV is in the trunk up thru 2008.) There are posts on the Forum that have step by step instructions.
Its really not worth it at this stage... A) how long are you going to keep the cars? B) Garmin offers a vastly superior unit which will thrill you rather than a vastly expensive MB unit that will amuse you with its limitations.
Also garmin has a nice, heavy, non sliding non bean bag dash top "mount" for their units. You'll find that you don't use a NAV unit as much as you predict. (Wife has this in her BMW 128 Conv: http://reviews.cnet.com/8301-13746_7-10461594-48.html
That being said, if I was ordering a car, I'd order the factory unit... but you're not ordering a new car.
Honest opinion.
Its really not worth it at this stage... A) how long are you going to keep the cars? B) Garmin offers a vastly superior unit which will thrill you rather than a vastly expensive MB unit that will amuse you with its limitations.
Also garmin has a nice, heavy, non sliding non bean bag dash top "mount" for their units. You'll find that you don't use a NAV unit as much as you predict. (Wife has this in her BMW 128 Conv: http://reviews.cnet.com/8301-13746_7-10461594-48.html
That being said, if I was ordering a car, I'd order the factory unit... but you're not ordering a new car.
Honest opinion.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 5,017
Likes: 16
From: Ft. Lauderdale Area, USA
2015 ML 350
You are absolutely right. The factory navigation system in the W211 is terrible...out-classed in every way by any $100 after-market gps and wildly out-classed by any $200 Garmin or TomTom system.
You are also dead-on about the Garmin bean-bag mount. It is excellent and puts the gps up at eye-level, not dangerously low on the dash like the factory unit.
I have the factory gps in my 2006 E320 and it absolutely "sucks". I use a refurb Garmin 680 and it is MUCH better (cost $175 a couple of years ago).
The W211 navigation system is something MB should be deeply ashamed of ever having put in a car.
- nopcbs
You are also dead-on about the Garmin bean-bag mount. It is excellent and puts the gps up at eye-level, not dangerously low on the dash like the factory unit.
I have the factory gps in my 2006 E320 and it absolutely "sucks". I use a refurb Garmin 680 and it is MUCH better (cost $175 a couple of years ago).
The W211 navigation system is something MB should be deeply ashamed of ever having put in a car.
- nopcbs
Member
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 234
Likes: 2
2006 E320 CDI
Not true
In car gps was invented in 1990. It first appeared in the US in a 1994 Olds. High resolution gps became available in the US in 2000. The W211 was introduced in 2002.
MB used the same crappy gps is the w211 all the way until it was replaced by the W212. There is absolutely no excuse for this.
You can get on it that it was not an in-house design (MB could not have been that stupid to try to design in-house something they knew exactly nothing about). However, MB chose the supplier and they are still completely responsible for the quality of the device and, in particular, for having let the thing languish as a mediocrity while the world went by. The gps in my wife's 2004 RX330 is FAR superior to the gps in my 2006 E320. No excuse for this. The beauty of electronic devices is that can be easilly updated and improved through cpu and firmware updates, let alone map updates. MB choosing to not do this is a disgrace to them.
I hope you are right that the W212 system is a modern design and as good as a $200 after-market unit. It took them a decade to get there.
- nopcbs
MB used the same crappy gps is the w211 all the way until it was replaced by the W212. There is absolutely no excuse for this.
You can get on it that it was not an in-house design (MB could not have been that stupid to try to design in-house something they knew exactly nothing about). However, MB chose the supplier and they are still completely responsible for the quality of the device and, in particular, for having let the thing languish as a mediocrity while the world went by. The gps in my wife's 2004 RX330 is FAR superior to the gps in my 2006 E320. No excuse for this. The beauty of electronic devices is that can be easilly updated and improved through cpu and firmware updates, let alone map updates. MB choosing to not do this is a disgrace to them.
I hope you are right that the W212 system is a modern design and as good as a $200 after-market unit. It took them a decade to get there.
- nopcbs
Don't forget, when the 211 was designed, there wasn't much demand for in dash NAV in an MB by its buying public. Then MB was saddled with a car that had so many quality problems, it took all their time & effort to turn it around so they weren't busy coming up with a newer NAV. The 2009+ unit is a good unit...
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 6,500
Likes: 336
From: Europe
223.168 & 213.012 & 906.633 & 214.005
Not true
In car gps was invented in 1990. It first appeared in the US in a 1994 Olds. High resolution gps became available in the US in 2000. The W211 was introduced in 2002.
MB used the same crappy gps is the w211 all the way until it was replaced by the W212. There is absolutely no excuse for this.
MB used the same crappy gps is the w211 all the way until it was replaced by the W212. There is absolutely no excuse for this.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 5,017
Likes: 16
From: Ft. Lauderdale Area, USA
2015 ML 350
The number of 211 cars ordered with NAV in the us is miniscule compared to the number without, so it wasn't a priority for them I guess... and if you remember, back in 2003 many of the cars were shipped with the wrong radio because the new for 2003 radio wasn't ready yet for the new model E. Quite a disaster, as I recall.
Last edited by Barry45RPM; Aug 31, 2010 at 11:08 AM.
Trending Topics
Member
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 234
Likes: 2
2006 E320 CDI
Thanks
I stand corrected then, they sold the crappy nav only until 2008.
- nopcbs
- nopcbs
MB World Stories
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
8 Oddball Mercedes Ideas That Actually Made it to Production
Verdad Gallardo
Dubai Tuner Gives the Mercedes G-Class An Entirely New Look
Verdad Gallardo
Six Gift Ideas Your AMG Loving Dad or Grad Will Cherish
7 Craziest Things AMG Gas Ever Built
Verdad Gallardo
New Electric Mercedes-AMG GT 4-Door Coupe Unveiled: 10 Things You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
6 Mercedes Models That Did NOT Age Well (But Are Somehow Still Cool)
Verdad Gallardo
Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren
Verdad Gallardo
8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine
Verdad Gallardo
Member
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 234
Likes: 2
2006 E320 CDI
That does not sound right.
NAV has been pretty much a boiler-plate item in high-priced spread cars for a LONG time. If you have sales figures to prove it, I will accept what you say, but it is extremely counter-intuitive.
In any case, it was an expensive option and MB has no business selling a junk unit in their cars. Shows lack of respect for the customer.
- nopcbs
In any case, it was an expensive option and MB has no business selling a junk unit in their cars. Shows lack of respect for the customer.
- nopcbs
The number of 211 cars ordered with NAV in the us is miniscule compared to the number without, so it wasn't a priority for them I guess... and if you remember, back in 2003 many of the cars were shipped with the wrong radio because the new for 2003 radio wasn't ready yet for the new model E. Quite a disaster, as I recall.
Thread Starter
Newbie
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: USA
2006 E55
I decided to go in a new direction. I don't need the NAV, but I do need comand. We (the company i work for) want it for the screen. We plan on writing new HMI software and using an overlay to make it a touch screen. It sounds like it is not to tough to retrofit comand. Diesel Benz said on another thread that if my current head unit is an Audio 20 CD, then Comand NTG2.5 would be the simplest to install, but it's not exactly plug-and-play. Is this still true if i dont want NAV? and how far beyond plug and play are we talking?
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 6,500
Likes: 336
From: Europe
223.168 & 213.012 & 906.633 & 214.005
I decided to go in a new direction. I don't need the NAV, but I do need comand. We (the company i work for) want it for the screen. We plan on writing new HMI software and using an overlay to make it a touch screen. It sounds like it is not to tough to retrofit comand. Diesel Benz said on another thread that if my current head unit is an Audio 20 CD, then Comand NTG2.5 would be the simplest to install, but it's not exactly plug-and-play. Is this still true if i dont want NAV? and how far beyond plug and play are we talking?
Anyway, you can start with a wiring harness kit like this:
http://www.comandonline.co.uk/W211-A...converter.html
This should give an idea how different the two units are.
If you have a look at the wiring diagrams of the two units, it is relatively easy to figure out the differences (and comparing to an NTG1 you can see how much more would be involved if that was swapped with an NTG2.5).
Thread Starter
Newbie
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: USA
2006 E55
Thankyou again everyone for your help. I think I got it all figured out. The million dollar question is, do i have to buy European parts or can i buy American parts? I am not installing navigation so I am guessing it doesn't matter. Can someone confirm this?
