Class Action suit over M272 M273
I don't see the point in waiting until the engine fails. This should be an interesting conversation with the dealer and MBUSA...
I basically don't want this issue to actually manifest itself with an inoperable engine at a bad time or when I'm far away from civilization.
I don't see the point in waiting until the engine fails. This should be an interesting conversation with the dealer and MBUSA...
I basically don't want this issue to actually manifest itself with an inoperable engine at a bad time or when I'm far away from civilization.
The class action suit offered the settlement that BMW would inspect all 3 series vehicles free of charge and decide it the car needed the repair. Once the owner did that, then BMW had done its part in respect to the settlement. But if the owner had signed on to the CA suit, and the issue showed up later on (despite BMW inspecting and doing the repair) then BMW had no more liability.
Many 3 series owners decided to settle with the CA suit. The idea was that BMW might find it didn't need the repair but in fact the issue could show up eventually. They felt by not accepting the settlement that they could force BMW to do the repair (when the issue actually did show up on their car) since it was a known issue and BMW admitted it. Apparently it worked and owners who pressured BMW to fix later outside of the CA suit were getting their cars fixed.
These kinds of issues where the problem may not show up for a long time are always tricky. That's why I say document everything right now and keep records of all your inquiries at the dealer. And monitor the CA suit. Hopefully MB will just add an extended warranty to anything that fails due to this issue. Like they did with SBC in the pre-face lift W211s.
Although my car has the M156 motor, I empathize with you folks. I went through the same thing with Volvo and their notorious ETM fiasco that they finally fessed up to (Google Volvo+ETM for laughs.) But all they could do was change the part when it failed. It's not comfortable knowing something will fail even if it is covered in the end.
This will be an issue with resale, and people looking to buy used W211s will be always asking if the repair is done or will the issue be covered for the second or third owner, etc.. This design problem stuff that only appears down the road can really blacklist cars in the resale market. Not fun.
The class action suit offered the settlement that BMW would inspect all 3 series vehicles free of charge and decide it the car needed the repair. Once the owner did that, then BMW had done its part in respect to the settlement. But if the owner had signed on to the CA suit, and the issue showed up later on (despite BMW inspecting and doing the repair) then BMW had no more liability.
Many 3 series owners decided to settle with the CA suit. The idea was that BMW might find it didn't need the repair but in fact the issue could show up eventually. They felt by not accepting the settlement that they could force BMW to do the repair (when the issue actually did show up on their car) since it was a known issue and BMW admitted it. Apparently it worked and owners who pressured BMW to fix later outside of the CA suit were getting their cars fixed.
These kinds of issues where the problem may not show up for a long time are always tricky. That's why I say document everything right now and keep records of all your inquiries at the dealer. And monitor the CA suit. Hopefully MB will just add an extended warranty to anything that fails due to this issue. Like they did with SBC in the pre-face lift W211s.
Although my car has the M156 motor, I empathize with you folks. I went through the same thing with Volvo and their notorious ETM fiasco that they finally fessed up to (Google Volvo+ETM for laughs.) But all they could do was change the part when it failed. It's not comfortable knowing something will fail even if it is covered in the end.
This will be an issue with resale, and people looking to buy used W211s will be always asking if the repair is done or will the issue be covered for the second or third owner, etc.. This design problem stuff that only appears down the road can really blacklist cars in the resale market. Not fun.
Yes I am amusingly looking forward to what direction my conversation with MBUSA/SA is going to go about trying to get them to replace this part before it fails inside the engine.
I feel like I've bought a boat with a hole on the bottom.
Me: But why don't you please fix the hole? It is slowly casuing the boat to sink and that can't be good. What if I'm in the middle of the ocean when the thing sinks for good?
MBUA: Well that's what the three pointed star is for. When the boat sinks you can tread water and use the three pointed star as a signaling device to call for help because it is so nice and shiny and reflects sunlight quite well.
Me:
It seems, based on what I understand about the problem, that it's not an "if it will happen", rather it is a "when it will happen" problem.
How that translates into a "we have to wait and see" approach, confuses me?
It seems, based on what I understand about the problem, that it's not an "if it will happen", rather it is a "when it will happen" problem.
How that translates into a "we have to wait and see" approach, confuses me?
It seems, based on what I understand about the problem, that it's not an "if it will happen", rather it is a "when it will happen" problem.
How that translates into a "we have to wait and see" approach, confuses me?
Whether that settlement is to your satisfaction is not guaranteed. And that's why some BMW owners decided not to jump onto the CA suit and instead push (and sue individually) BMW to fix their cars. They did have the fact that BMW admitted design flaw on their side.
That's why I mentioned all you can do right now is document and record all communication, and watch the progress of the CA suit.
Unfortunately MB will not fix something that isn't bad now, even if it's going to go bad. Same with SBC. They didn't remove it from the cars (they did after the W211 facelift), instead they just extended the warranty on that component(s); Volvo did the same with their ETM failure. BMW is currently doing the same with their HPFP failures. It's "replace and fix when it happens" and not "preemptive action." The cars will be fixed for free but not until they fail.
In the meantime, if you have the stomach for it (and the time) you can press MBUSA for goodwill and try to get them to replace before it fails. But that would be short of a miracle at this stage.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
While my car's engine # is higher than the one you mentioned for Fault Code #1, it is within range for Fault Code #2 and #3.
While the flat rate for these camshaft adjustment solenoid changes if not very long (no engine R&R), is there any possible engine damage that could occur if one (or more) of these solenoids was to malfunction?
ktm950se
It will be interesting to see what the response is to this from both MB and from the dealer. How will they treat a loyal customer, devoted MB enthusiast?
I've attached the class action suit filing and the repair instructions (which explains how much time is involved with this repair and why it is so expensive).
Here is the firm that is handling the class action suit:
Dalton Law Firm
Here are some related sites (there are many of these online that have the same text):
Class Action Suit Reference #1
Class Action Suit Reference #2
(Some of these are found elsewhere on this thread, but I thought I'd assemble in one place to make it easy to find).
Go to http://epc.startekinfo.com/epc/welcome.jsp
They ask for a credit card, but do not charge for North American models.
I would be skeptical of the effected serial numbers listed. This is an expensive repair, and the source of the serial numbers is not identified very well.
http://classactionlawsuitsinthenews....-m273-engines/
Been talking to MB Zone rep about this. Sent her the lawsuit filing from 2010 (see my previous post to read the file) and she told me she contacted MB legal team and they told her that this suit was "thrown out" of court. Dalton Law Firm is assembling a new group of claimants to file a class action suit.
This is what I expect a decent corporation to do when they make a mistake. Admit error, and cover 85% of the cost to fix.
I bought my Wife a 2007 C230 and it falls on the list of the engines with the weak balancer material. (This drives me a bit crazy sometimes)
I had an extended warranty of 6 years and or 100 thousand miles (Currently at 50 Thousand). I often wonder how Mercedes Benz would handle that if and when the engine in my wifes car codes? When I found out about this, just before my extended warranty expired. I called MB of North America and I explained to them how frustraded I was to find out about that my wifes car was, and could be affected by this issue in the future and at that point while out of warranty; At that point I was told that they take care of the customers out of Loyalty.
I just hope to come out good if I run into this fiasco.
Cheers
Last edited by ecaman77; Dec 29, 2011 at 12:49 PM.
The balance shaft sprocket didn't have teeth, it had nubs, so there must have been a significant loss of power over the last few years as it wore down.
I was amazed when I drove it out of the dealership. It's like driving a new car. There is significantly more power and it is shifting up and down without any of those odd stutters I was feeling last summer (and trying to convince myself that I was imagining it).
Anyway, a big
P.S. I had a 2011 C300 4Matic as a loaner the whole time, put 3000 miles on it with holiday travel--free of charge of course! I wrote about that in another post if you want to read my comparison of the W204s I've driven as loaners with my W203.
The balance shaft sprocket didn't have teeth, it had nubs, so there must have been a significant loss of power over the last few years as it wore down.
I was amazed when I drove it out of the dealership. It's like driving a new car. There is significantly more power and it is shifting up and down without any of those odd stutters I was feeling last summer (and trying to convince myself that I was imagining it).
Anyway, a big
P.S. I had a 2011 C300 4Matic as a loaner the whole time, put 3000 miles on it with holiday travel--free of charge of course! I wrote about that in another post if you want to read my comparison of the W204s I've driven as loaners with my W203.
It will show all work done on your vehicle.
Edit : never mind, I just saw your other post re being a U.S. car in Labanon.
Last edited by starbrite; Jan 16, 2012 at 10:50 AM.
Re Transfer Case: The warranty company only put in a remanufactured transfer case in my car and Mercedes White Plains would not accept it. After 10 days at Mercedes WP, I took it to a reputable shop, Rennsport USA in Bedford NY for the repair. I had to pay an extra $400 out of pocket because the indies hourly charge was more than what contract covered at $100 per hour plus a $100 deductible. I got soo disgusted that I wanted to sell the car soo badly but after I got it back and it ran nice and smooth, I want to keep it until the next problem occurs which I hope wont be for a long time.




