E-Class (W211) 2003-2009

E500 vs 545i

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 01-07-2016, 05:56 AM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Truu_Ston3r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2004 E500 4matic
E500 vs 545i

It's now 2016. It's been 12 YEARS since these cars were new and I want to hear your opinion

Now that u have had your car for a while now would you trade it in for a 545? (Theoretically speaking)

Why would you keep/sell your 500?
Old 01-07-2016, 08:48 AM
  #2  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
homeofstone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Athens, GA USA
Posts: 1,084
Received 68 Likes on 55 Posts
2011 E63, 2011 Hyundai Genesis 4.6 v8, 2013 GMC Denali XL, 1965 Ford Mustang, 2005 Merc. E500
My 2005 E500 (150,000 miles) is still serving our family well and its not getting replaced.
Old 01-07-2016, 10:52 AM
  #3  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
2MERKS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Merkville the galaxy of Stars
Posts: 1,654
Received 228 Likes on 208 Posts
'99 CLK/05 E500 WAG
We should be putting you on the trading block for asking that question!! We only discuss Merks, Go to "the other" site to talk about their cars!! lol
Old 01-07-2016, 12:51 PM
  #4  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
kajtek1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: V E G A S
Posts: 9,067
Received 1,730 Likes on 1,380 Posts
1922 Ford Model T / no OBD
Typical comparison between the brands is "one is good as hot date, the other is good to marry"
I think aging hot date is less desirable, than well aging wife.
Old 01-07-2016, 02:37 PM
  #5  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
e500slr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,211
Received 28 Likes on 23 Posts
2011 E63, 2013 CLS63
I think the 545i has a better gearbox and more power. I think they're faster but they don't sound nearly as good with a decent exhaust and the E60 interior is just lacking that special feeling. It's nice but cannot compete with the W211.

The W211 is getting a little dated now, even with the facelift. It's not the design that is to blame but the SIZE. If you look at the F10 and put a W211 next to it, it's like a large car next to a small car and remember, they're supposed to be in the same size category. Mercedes made a HUGE mistake making the W211 small and slim. It should have been 6 inches longer and 4 inches wider and fatter, same design (which is actually breathtaking and timeless) but just fatter and bigger.

Here in Aus, domestic cars DWARF the W211 and the great thing about them is, they never got bigger, they were big to begin with from the mid 90s to now, they maintained their size and size is important for a luxury car. Take a Bentley Mulsanne and shrink it, no one is gonna buy it and it's not gonna have that "WOW" and exotic factor anymore regardless of the design or quality or prestige.

The E60 isn't that much bigger on paper but it's certainly a bigger looking car in real life. It's not as beautiful in design though. The M5 is very sexy but the normal E60 is TERRIBLE, it's pretty ugly.

It handles better than the W211 but the W211 is more comfortable (with the Airmatic). The W211 feels nicer and has a better vibe, a warm vibe whereas the E60 is cold and clinical to me.

The Merc is more reliable hands down, I've owned a BMW 5 series, amazing car to drive but they are UNRELIABLE, they have alot of issues. Just look at the 7 series E65, they are a MONEY PIT, a giant hole you get rid of your cash in hence the hilarious depreciation which still won't make up for the headaches which are CHRONIC in that series. Even the M5, blows its SMG regularly and that high strung V10 is not a workhorse.

All in all I think the Merc is better but Mercedes screwed up with the size BIG TIME. It would have been timelessly SEXY if it had been WIDE and longer.
Old 01-07-2016, 02:37 PM
  #6  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
cmriv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: dmv
Posts: 1,486
Received 44 Likes on 40 Posts
2009 E550 2000 Honda civic mash n' go
the fact you can get the bimmer in a manual has me questioning, hmmmmm. idk tbh-i would need to drive a "older" version 211 to faithfully answer that. But more times then not i lean towards a manual vehicle.
Old 01-07-2016, 02:38 PM
  #7  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
cmriv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: dmv
Posts: 1,486
Received 44 Likes on 40 Posts
2009 E550 2000 Honda civic mash n' go
Originally Posted by e500slr
I think the 545i has a better gearbox and more power. I think they're faster but they don't sound nearly as good with a decent exhaust and the E60 interior is just lacking that special feeling. It's nice but cannot compete with the W211.

The W211 is getting a little dated now, even with the facelift. It's not the design that is to blame but the SIZE. If you look at the F10 and put a W211 next to it, it's like a large car next to a small car and remember, they're supposed to be in the same size category. Mercedes made a HUGE mistake making the W211 small and slim. It should have been 6 inches longer and 4 inches wider and fatter, same design (which is actually breathtaking and timeless) but just fatter and bigger.

Here in Aus, domestic cars DWARF the W211 and the great thing about them is, they never got bigger, they were big to begin with from the mid 90s to now, they maintained their size and size is important for a luxury car. Take a Bentley Mulsanne and shrink it, no one is gonna buy it and it's not gonna have that "WOW" and exotic factor anymore regardless of the design or quality or prestige.

The E60 isn't that much bigger on paper but it's certainly a bigger looking car in real life. It's not as beautiful in design though. The M5 is very sexy but the normal E60 is TERRIBLE, it's pretty ugly.

It handles better than the W211 but the W211 is more comfortable (with the Airmatic). The W211 feels nicer and has a better vibe, a warm vibe whereas the E60 is cold and clinical to me.

The Merc is more reliable hands down, I've owned a BMW 5 series, amazing car to drive but they are UNRELIABLE, they have alot of issues. Just look at the 7 series E65, they are a MONEY PIT, a giant hole you get rid of your cash in hence the hilarious depreciation which still won't make up for the headaches which are CHRONIC in that series. Even the M5, blows its SMG regularly and that high strung V10 is not a workhorse.

All in all I think the Merc is better but Mercedes screwed up with the size BIG TIME. It would have been timelessly SEXY if it had been WIDE and longer.

6 inches longer is a s-class...
Old 01-07-2016, 03:57 PM
  #8  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Truu_Ston3r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2004 E500 4matic
Originally Posted by 2MERKS
We should be putting you on the trading block for asking that question!! We only discuss Merks, Go to "the other" site to talk about their cars!! lol
LOL! Proud owner of an e500 4matic would never trade it in for any 545!! I just wanted to hear opinions
Old 01-07-2016, 04:02 PM
  #9  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Truu_Ston3r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2004 E500 4matic
Originally Posted by e500slr
I think the 545i has a better gearbox and more power. I think they're faster but they don't sound nearly as good with a decent exhaust and the E60 interior is just lacking that special feeling. It's nice but cannot compete with the W211.

The W211 is getting a little dated now, even with the facelift. It's not the design that is to blame but the SIZE. If you look at the F10 and put a W211 next to it, it's like a large car next to a small car and remember, they're supposed to be in the same size category. Mercedes made a HUGE mistake making the W211 small and slim. It should have been 6 inches longer and 4 inches wider and fatter, same design (which is actually breathtaking and timeless) but just fatter and bigger.

Here in Aus, domestic cars DWARF the W211 and the great thing about them is, they never got bigger, they were big to begin with from the mid 90s to now, they maintained their size and size is important for a luxury car. Take a Bentley Mulsanne and shrink it, no one is gonna buy it and it's not gonna have that "WOW" and exotic factor anymore regardless of the design or quality or prestige.

The E60 isn't that much bigger on paper but it's certainly a bigger looking car in real life. It's not as beautiful in design though. The M5 is very sexy but the normal E60 is TERRIBLE, it's pretty ugly.

It handles better than the W211 but the W211 is more comfortable (with the Airmatic). The W211 feels nicer and has a better vibe, a warm vibe whereas the E60 is cold and clinical to me.

The Merc is more reliable hands down, I've owned a BMW 5 series, amazing car to drive but they are UNRELIABLE, they have alot of issues. Just look at the 7 series E65, they are a MONEY PIT, a giant hole you get rid of your cash in hence the hilarious depreciation which still won't make up for the headaches which are CHRONIC in that series. Even the M5, blows its SMG regularly and that high strung V10 is not a workhorse.

All in all I think the Merc is better but Mercedes screwed up with the size BIG TIME. It would have been timelessly SEXY if it had been WIDE and longer.
You summed that up almost perfectly. The only thing I don't agree with you on is the 211 size. This car to me is a perfectly sized car not to small but not to big (hence midsize sedan)
Old 01-07-2016, 04:04 PM
  #10  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Truu_Ston3r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2004 E500 4matic
Originally Posted by cmriv
the fact you can get the bimmer in a manual has me questioning, hmmmmm. idk tbh-i would need to drive a "older" version 211 to faithfully answer that. But more times then not i lean towards a manual vehicle.
It would be awesome if the w211 came in manual hell I wouldn't even care if it was a 5 speed manual lol
Old 01-07-2016, 04:19 PM
  #11  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
cmriv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: dmv
Posts: 1,486
Received 44 Likes on 40 Posts
2009 E550 2000 Honda civic mash n' go
Originally Posted by Truu_Ston3r
It would be awesome if the w211 came in manual hell I wouldn't even care if it was a 5 speed manual lol
I couldn't agree more. I can't fathom why they don't just upgrade the 6sp's that come in the c300 2wd m/t cars. And i think the size of the 211 is perfect as well. It's a big body sedan and it isn't at the same time.

I understand manufactures are moving more towards triptronic transmission now, but gah-lee, what about us that what that sporty feeling of manual transmission in our luxurious car??? HUH!? what about us
Old 01-07-2016, 05:49 PM
  #12  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
kajtek1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: V E G A S
Posts: 9,067
Received 1,730 Likes on 1,380 Posts
1922 Ford Model T / no OBD
You guys either forgot, or are too young to remember how much hassle it is to replace clutch plate every 60,000 miles
Modern clutches also have hydraulic cylinders for activation, what is another higher maintenance item.
To top it you will have clutch safety switch and that one on my truck gave me wet back alone.
Old 01-07-2016, 08:04 PM
  #13  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
e500slr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,211
Received 28 Likes on 23 Posts
2011 E63, 2013 CLS63
Originally Posted by cmriv
6 inches longer is a s-class...
Originally Posted by Truu_Ston3r
You summed that up almost perfectly. The only thing I don't agree with you on is the 211 size. This car to me is a perfectly sized car not to small but not to big (hence midsize sedan)
The S is 15-16 inches longer believe it or not. I think you mean C218 CLS size which is perfect IMO. The facelifted AMG front on the W211 is a very very very beautiful design, just perfect. It looks like an animal muscle car and that's what the body should support as well. It has such a perfect face but the problem is, it's too "skinny". It needed to "hit the gym" and bulk up. I guess that's the way I like cars.





Here's a car sold here called an HSV. This thing is HUGE! It's 3 inches wider than the W211 but alot fatter as well. It's also 4 inches longer but as you can see, it's a fat, full car. When a car is too slim it ages very badly. Look how new cars get bigger every generation. The Merc, being a Mercedes, should have been bigger than its rival E60 and A6 Audi but it's not and looks small next to them.
Old 01-08-2016, 01:45 AM
  #14  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
OnlyGerman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,036
Received 170 Likes on 131 Posts
Too many german broads
Owned a 530i, which was a great car... Heard horror stories about the 545.
Old 01-08-2016, 06:43 AM
  #15  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Truu_Ston3r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2004 E500 4matic
Maybe an a6

Originally Posted by Kushp14
Owned a 530i, which was a great car... Heard horror stories about the 545.
I owned a E60 525i but the interior is just "boring" which is why I got rid of it. The Benz will never handle like it but that 5.0 (I don't need the 5.4 or supercharged) makes up for the handling.

I always wanted to catch a lonely 545i who wants to play but I can't find them. I'm guessing those horror stories are living up to its name.

I know it's a little but how would the a6 c6 4.2 compare to these 2 (well the 500)
Old 01-08-2016, 06:55 AM
  #16  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Truu_Ston3r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2004 E500 4matic
Originally Posted by e500slr
The S is 15-16 inches longer believe it or not. I think you mean C218 CLS size which is perfect IMO. The facelifted AMG front on the W211 is a very very very beautiful design, just perfect. It looks like an animal muscle car and that's what the body should support as well. It has such a perfect face but the problem is, it's too "skinny". It needed to "hit the gym" and bulk up. I guess that's the way I like cars.





Here's a car sold here called an HSV. This thing is HUGE! It's 3 inches wider than the W211 but alot fatter as well. It's also 4 inches longer but as you can see, it's a fat, full car. When a car is too slim it ages very badly. Look how new cars get bigger every generation. The Merc, being a Mercedes, should have been bigger than its rival E60 and A6 Audi but it's not and looks small next to them.
HSV= Pontiac G8 which is one fast sedan. The stance of the car makes it look aggressive the only car I'm comparing that to is the e55 but I see what your saying about "slim?" Cars lol. but to me I feel like the e500 wheel fenders "stick out" more than its rivals giving it a more wider look


To me it looks like the cls is almost as long as the s
Old 01-08-2016, 06:57 AM
  #17  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Truu_Ston3r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2004 E500 4matic
Originally Posted by kajtek1
You guys either forgot, or are too young to remember how much hassle it is to replace clutch plate every 60,000 miles
Modern clutches also have hydraulic cylinders for activation, what is another higher maintenance item.
To top it you will have clutch safety switch and that one on my truck gave me wet back alone.
Your right but which one is more expensive to maintain ( fix when it actually breaks) dct or manual
Old 01-08-2016, 07:02 AM
  #18  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Truu_Ston3r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2004 E500 4matic
Originally Posted by cmriv
I couldn't agree more. I can't fathom why they don't just upgrade the 6sp's that come in the c300 2wd m/t cars. And i think the size of the 211 is perfect as well. It's a big body sedan and it isn't at the same time.

I understand manufactures are moving more towards triptronic transmission now, but gah-lee, what about us that what that sporty feeling of manual transmission in our luxurious car??? HUH!? what about us
They don't care about us no more
Dct is taking over. Don't get me wrong dct is great I just want a 3rd pedal

Tbh i rarely see a c300 with 6 speed I wonder why Mercedes even bothered
Old 01-08-2016, 08:56 AM
  #19  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
2MERKS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Merkville the galaxy of Stars
Posts: 1,654
Received 228 Likes on 208 Posts
'99 CLK/05 E500 WAG
Smile You...

Originally Posted by Truu_Ston3r
LOL! Proud owner of an e500 4matic would never trade it in for any 545!! I just wanted to hear opinions
Are correct!!! Now for a G-Class hummmm??
Old 01-08-2016, 10:41 AM
  #20  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
kajtek1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: V E G A S
Posts: 9,067
Received 1,730 Likes on 1,380 Posts
1922 Ford Model T / no OBD
Originally Posted by Truu_Ston3r
Your right but which one is more expensive to maintain ( fix when it actually breaks) dct or manual
On my 6-sp in Ford Truck 5-th gear was popping out occasionally, what likely was just a holder.
But no shop wanted just repair it and rebuild cost was quoted about $2000.
The MB 5-auto transmission seem to last forever with $10 pilot bushing replacement every 10 years and if they fail, you can buy used for $600.

Last edited by kajtek1; 01-08-2016 at 02:56 PM.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: E500 vs 545i



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:46 AM.