E-Class (W211) 2003-2009
Old Jun 17, 2015, 07:47 PM
How-Tos on this Topic
Last edit by: IB Advertising
See related guides and technical advice from our community experts:Browse all: Steering and Suspension Guides
Print Wikipost

E320 suspension - I don't get it. Rough.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Aug 22, 2004 | 11:36 PM
  #1  
Captain Obvious's Avatar
Thread Starter
Almost a Member!
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Thumbs down E320 suspension - I don't get it. Rough.

Is it just me, or is the regular E320 suspension very poorly tuned?

I've adjusted tire pressure from 29psi up to 40psi all the way around. Regardless, this car is very jarring over medium to large bumps in the road. When cornering, if ONE wheel hits a bump, the entire front end skirts to the side. So much for independant suspension.

Are they trying to compete with BMW by transfering more bumps to the cabin? The real trick is to communicate the little stuff yet soften the blow of medium and larger bumps. Somehow, Mercedes managed to hide the small stuff completely, make the car hop sideways in a corner over medium or larger bumps, and make large bumps very rough, and yet STILL have the thing float around up and down like a Cadilac!

I love the car, but the suspension tuning could have been done by a Kindergarten class (with no stated objective).

So far, I'm happiest with higher pressure (at 36.5psi today). At least it doesn't float as much. The bumps are jarring regardless of pressure.

I used to drive a 330i with sport suspension with Pole Position S-03 tires at 37+ psi, so don't classify me as a wussy who can't handle feedback. This is flat out poor tuning. I'm sure we have some marketing morons to thank for it.

The 5 series with sport suspension is far superior in this regard. More firm, yet less jarring. If it weren't for the stiff runflat tires, it would probably be perfect.

Comments?
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2004 | 11:50 PM
  #2  
Captain Obvious's Avatar
Thread Starter
Almost a Member!
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
More questions:

Any idea why the car rides fairly rough? Would different bushings make a difference?

Is the suspension aluminum like the E60, or is it steel?

I would think with 16 inch wheels, the unsprung weight would be very reasonable. Wouldn't that make tuning out the bumps very easy?

Maybe Mercedes customers of old are expecting a certain road feel and they tried to preserve that. To me, the suspension feels dated by a minimum of 20 years.
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2004 | 12:24 AM
  #3  
Spartan's Avatar
Super Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 819
Likes: 0
06 320E CDI, Porsche 911 C2, Pontiac Montana
What? I run my tires at 35 psi and the car rides great. I live in Toronto and it's not exactly cow paths but even over rougher pavement, I don't have any problem with the ride.

What tires are you running and where do you live?
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2004 | 12:40 AM
  #4  
DWP's Avatar
DWP
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,586
Likes: 1
From: Sacramento
'08 AM Vantage V8 - '03 E500
It's not your imagination, C.O. I've got an E500, and you would think that the air suspension would totally change the ride/handling equation, but it doesn't. I've been complaining for as long as I've had the car (one year next month) that for a supposed luxury car, it sure has a rough, jolting and noisy ride on a less-than-perfect road surface. I don't find that it floats, which may be a difference between the E320 and the E500, but I can sure relate to your comments about the jarring ride and the poor isolation from road irregularities.

I've had the opportunity to make a BMW/M-B comparison, too. Our previous car was a '97 (E39) 5-Series. The folks in Munich are as brilliant at tuning suspensions as the people in Stuttgart are clueless. Our E39 was a remarkable combination of supple and quiet ride and tack-sharp handling.

I can't stand the exterior or interior of the current 5-Series, so I'm seriously considering going downmarket to an Acura TL or Infiniti G35.
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2004 | 01:03 AM
  #5  
johna1's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 351
Likes: 4
From: Christchurch, New Zealand
17 E220D, 11 E350 CDI(sold), 06 CLS320 CDI (sold), 05 Cadillac DeVille (gone), 04 E320 CDI (sold)
Can you tell us what options you have fitted? e.g. Airmatic suspension, sports package? wheel size and tire choice?

My E320 certainly doesn't behave like yours, I find it the nicest riding car I've driven for a long time, and the handling is quite acceptable given what it is trying to achieve.
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2004 | 01:10 AM
  #6  
akbro93704's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,093
Likes: 0
From: California
2014 C250 sport
Originally Posted by Captain Obvious
Is it just me, or is the regular E320 suspension very poorly tuned?

I've adjusted tire pressure from 29psi up to 40psi all the way around. Regardless, this car is very jarring over medium to large bumps in the road. When cornering, if ONE wheel hits a bump, the entire front end skirts to the side. So much for independant suspension.

Are they trying to compete with BMW by transfering more bumps to the cabin? The real trick is to communicate the little stuff yet soften the blow of medium and larger bumps. Somehow, Mercedes managed to hide the small stuff completely, make the car hop sideways in a corner over medium or larger bumps, and make large bumps very rough, and yet STILL have the thing float around up and down like a Cadilac!

I love the car, but the suspension tuning could have been done by a Kindergarten class (with no stated objective).

So far, I'm happiest with higher pressure (at 36.5psi today). At least it doesn't float as much. The bumps are jarring regardless of pressure.

I used to drive a 330i with sport suspension with Pole Position S-03 tires at 37+ psi, so don't classify me as a wussy who can't handle feedback. This is flat out poor tuning. I'm sure we have some marketing morons to thank for it.

The 5 series with sport suspension is far superior in this regard. More firm, yet less jarring. If it weren't for the stiff runflat tires, it would probably be perfect.

Comments?
The W211 definitely has a better ride than the W210. The previous generation E-class has a not so good ride, every big bump booms inside the cabin..and most of all, it has tons of road noise, especially in the back seat.
The "new" E-class has a reasonably smooth ride, but I do agree, it could be better and its leaning too much on the firm side. However,the chassis feels very rigid and strong, and there's no booming noises, and a lot less road noise compared with the W210. The E-class does have capable handling though.
PS--If you really want a smooth and quiet ride (but with no handling capabilities), get a Lexus LS 430 :p
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2004 | 12:11 PM
  #7  
luxury1's Avatar
Super Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 583
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
I really like the ride. I feel it is a good balance between sporty and smooth but I am coming off of a 5 series with the sport package where you feel every bump and every crack in the road.
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2004 | 01:46 PM
  #8  
F1Fan's Avatar
Super Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 545
Likes: 87
From: Southern California
Ok, let me ask the obvious questions. What kind of tires are you using? What suspension (airmatic?) is on the car? If comfort is a priority, why are you inflating the tires above the factory recommendation? What is your driving style? Autobahn burner or leisure cruise? What road surfaces are you driving on?
Reply
MB World Stories

The Best of Mercedes & AMG

story-0

6 Mercedes Models That Did NOT Age Well (But Are Somehow Still Cool)

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun

 Verdad Gallardo
story-2

Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction

 Verdad Gallardo
story-5

Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve

 Verdad Gallardo
story-8

Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping

 Verdad Gallardo
story-9

10 Most Reliable Mercedes-Benz Models You Can Buy Used

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Aug 23, 2004 | 01:53 PM
  #9  
Captain Obvious's Avatar
Thread Starter
Almost a Member!
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Luxury1, Did you have an E39 or an E60?

I think the W211 rides rougher than an E39 with sport package. The E39 let the little stuff through (surface texture), but not the bigger stuff. The ride of the W211 makes it feel heavier than it is, and maybe that was their goal

My car doesn't feel floaty with the tire pressure at the current 36.5psi. It did when I went 29 all the way around. I realize that this is lower than MB suggests for the rear.

I also find the car to be surprisingly noisy over textured pavement. I suspect the tires are a major contributor (neither of the stock tires were well reviewed at tirerack). I also wonder if having tinted windows (and therefore the inside rubber seals rubber replaced with fuzzy felt stuff) might contribute also.

Like I said, I love the car. I did ride in a 10 year old Lexus ES300 that was quieter and less bumpy though. I'd expect more for a car in this class.
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2004 | 02:02 PM
  #10  
lig's Avatar
lig
Super Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 957
Likes: 1
was '03 E320 - now - '04 S4
Purely an opinion - I think this car is optimized for high speed cruising. That is when it seems happiest to me.

The ride / noise level in the city is a bit higher than I would have liked.

The car just feels better at speed. In the city I find the steering ratio to be impossibly slow - at speed it feels just fine.

In the city I think the throttle response / transmission response can be funky. At speed - no problem.

In the city - I think the brake "feel" is awful. At speed - the brakes are excellent.
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2004 | 02:02 PM
  #11  
F1Fan's Avatar
Super Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 545
Likes: 87
From: Southern California
I think you hit a good point. For this particular MB, the ride seems to be somewhere between a Lexus and a BMW. Lexus being the smoothest ride and BMW being the sportiest luxury ride. The E seems somewhere in the middle of the two.
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2004 | 02:26 PM
  #12  
Barry45RPM's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 5,017
Likes: 16
From: Ft. Lauderdale Area, USA
2015 ML 350
I "love" how you have to manually "un-turn" the wheel to center after turning a corner! What's that all about? Just like the rudder on a ship! ...Just nit picking, though.

Last edited by Barry45RPM; Aug 23, 2004 at 02:37 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2004 | 02:31 PM
  #13  
lig's Avatar
lig
Super Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 957
Likes: 1
was '03 E320 - now - '04 S4
Originally Posted by Barry45RPM
I "love" how you have to manually "un-turn" the wheel to center after turning a corner! What's that all about? ...Just nit picking, though.
One of my pet peeves too. I asked the Service crew to dial up the caster when I had my car in for Schedule B (that usually increases the "self-return" and gives a "heavier" feel to the wheel) but they told me it wouldn't help.
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2004 | 04:02 PM
  #14  
DavidNJ's Avatar
Super Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 758
Likes: 1
From: Warren, NJ
'05 E320 CDI;'04 S2k;'94 Supra TT;'10 QX56;'38 Buick;98 Port City Offset Late Model
Positive caster causes a self-centering. Is there something in the power steering defeating this?

Obiviously it would be nice if you specify which brand, model, and size of tire you have when reporting handling and ride issues.

Thanks,

David
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2004 | 04:36 PM
  #15  
Captain Obvious's Avatar
Thread Starter
Almost a Member!
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
lig,

Good point. The car may be optimized for higher speeds. Hadn't thought about that.

I do agree steering is a little slow around town, but I drive this car slower than I drove my 330i, so I guess it doesn't bother me much.

FYI, I believe my tires are Michelin MXV4 Plus or something like that.
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2004 | 04:59 PM
  #16  
psyrtash's Avatar
Almost a Member!
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
From: Toronto
Originally Posted by Captain Obvious
Is it just me, or is the regular E320 suspension very poorly tuned?

I've adjusted tire pressure from 29psi up to 40psi all the way around. Regardless, this car is very jarring over medium to large bumps in the road. When cornering, if ONE wheel hits a bump, the entire front end skirts to the side. So much for independant suspension.

Are they trying to compete with BMW by transfering more bumps to the cabin? The real trick is to communicate the little stuff yet soften the blow of medium and larger bumps. Somehow, Mercedes managed to hide the small stuff completely, make the car hop sideways in a corner over medium or larger bumps, and make large bumps very rough, and yet STILL have the thing float around up and down like a Cadilac!

I love the car, but the suspension tuning could have been done by a Kindergarten class (with no stated objective).

So far, I'm happiest with higher pressure (at 36.5psi today). At least it doesn't float as much. The bumps are jarring regardless of pressure.

I used to drive a 330i with sport suspension with Pole Position S-03 tires at 37+ psi, so don't classify me as a wussy who can't handle feedback. This is flat out poor tuning. I'm sure we have some marketing morons to thank for it.

The 5 series with sport suspension is far superior in this regard. More firm, yet less jarring. If it weren't for the stiff runflat tires, it would probably be perfect.

Comments?
M.B recommended tire pressure for for 2004 320E 4Matics is: up to 100mph is 26psi front and 32psi rear and over 100mph 29psi front and 35psi rear
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2004 | 05:03 PM
  #17  
DavidNJ's Avatar
Super Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 758
Likes: 1
From: Warren, NJ
'05 E320 CDI;'04 S2k;'94 Supra TT;'10 QX56;'38 Buick;98 Port City Offset Late Model
Bilstein offers several different replacement shocks for the W211 in Germany, however none for Bilstein USA. My experience is that the Bilsteins solve alot of problems. That said, isn't the Airmatic DC a Bilstein product?
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2004 | 05:39 PM
  #18  
luxury1's Avatar
Super Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 583
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Originally Posted by Captain Obvious
Luxury1, Did you have an E39 or an E60?
It was a 2002 5 series (can't remember what they called it E39 or E60)....
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2004 | 05:46 PM
  #19  
lyrixmajor's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
From: Sunny Fort Lauderdale, FL USA
2004 E500 w/ AMG Sport Package
it depends on what you're looking for. I am very new owner and I bought my E500 because I wanted a sport sedan. Remember the E55 is the fastest Sport Sedan On the planet. So i expected a bumpy ride especially with the AMG Sports pkg. with that said the ride could be better. I feel when the suspesnion is adjusting and that sucks. My GS300 was a far more smoother car, but the E Class definately handles the road better.

I bet you the S Class has a way more smoother suspension, and the CL over the SL.
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2004 | 06:07 PM
  #20  
lyrixmajor's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
From: Sunny Fort Lauderdale, FL USA
2004 E500 w/ AMG Sport Package
Originally Posted by Barry45RPM
I "love" how you have to manually "un-turn" the wheel to center after turning a corner! What's that all about? Just like the rudder on a ship! ...Just nit picking, though.

drive me nuts too....many times i've let go the steering wheel only to realize i gotta "unturn" it.
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2004 | 01:00 AM
  #21  
DavidNJ's Avatar
Super Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 758
Likes: 1
From: Warren, NJ
'05 E320 CDI;'04 S2k;'94 Supra TT;'10 QX56;'38 Buick;98 Port City Offset Late Model
Can some of the current CDI owners chime in? I recall think that an E320 we test drove in February was a bit rough, crashing in to bumps like railroad tracks. However, seeking out railroad tracks in two CDI test drives, the problem seemed minimized. I wonder if the 200# of added weight on the nose makes a difference.

It is my understanding (which may be wrong) that low frequency shock stiffness affects handling over low frequency bumps and through corners, and high frequency stiffness affects ride over sharper bumps like railroad track, expansion joints, and potholes.

In earlier times shocks got stiffer at higher frequency, creating a loose floating feeling while still banging into bumps. Digressive shocks do just the opposite, providing firm control over body movement while being relatively soft over high frequency bumps.

It sounds like a shock problem...IMHO.
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2004 | 11:19 AM
  #22  
rbordel's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
From: Texas
05 E320 CDI
Originally Posted by DavidNJ
Can some of the current CDI owners chime in?
I have no complaints concerning the suspension (I don't have airmatic) but then again I'm not the kind of driver who pushes the suspension to its limits, either. I bought this car to be an economical highway cruiser, and the car does that job very well.
Reply

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:42 AM.

story-0
6 Mercedes Models That Did NOT Age Well (But Are Somehow Still Cool)

Slideshow: Not every Mercedes design becomes timeless, some feel stuck in the era they came from.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:09:07


VIEW MORE
story-1
Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun

Slideshow: Yes, Mercedes built manual cars, and some of them are far more interesting than you'd expect.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-02 12:36:58


VIEW MORE
story-2
Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren

Slideshow: A one-of-one U.S.-spec Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren Roadster became even rarer after a factory-backed transformation at McLaren's headquarters.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-29 11:19:28


VIEW MORE
story-3
8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine

Slideshow: Before curves took over, Mercedes mastered the art of the straight line, and some of those shapes still look right today.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-25 12:05:49


VIEW MORE
story-4
Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction

Slideshow: The 190E Evolution II shows how a homologation necessity became a six-figure collector icon.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-22 17:53:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know

Slideshow: Mercedes is turning one of its core nameplates electric, and the details show just how serious this shift is.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-21 13:58:06


VIEW MORE
story-6
Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know

Slideshow: Faster charging, longer range, and a controversial steer-by-wire system define the latest evolution of Mercedes-Benz EQS.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-15 10:35:34


VIEW MORE
story-7
5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve

Slideshow: These overlooked Mercedes-Benz models never got the spotlight, but they quietly delivered more than most remember.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-13 19:35:45


VIEW MORE
story-8
Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping

Slideshow: A well-used 1991 Mercedes-Benz 300D with more than one million miles is now looking for a new owner, and it still appears ready for more.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-10 10:05:15


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Most Reliable Mercedes-Benz Models You Can Buy Used

Slideshow: From bulletproof sedans to surprisingly tough SUVs, these Mercedes models proved that the three-pointed star can go the distance.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-08 09:55:49


VIEW MORE