








Do We Like The Redesigned '05 E Center Console?
Is it on ALL new 211's Worldwide, are is it some form of punishment? Surely America must be the largest customer for this model?
It is certainly upsetting a few potential customers on this forum.
Regards,
John
A sunny afternoon in Torquay (off for some physiotherapy)
No one seems to have the definitive answere as to whether I can have my body shop paint it to match without losing any signal strength, so black it stays.
As far as the old style console's cup holders go:
1. You have to have your arm on the armrest with a cup in the swing out cup holder so you can hold the cup from tipping over. You just can't trust them.
2. With a cup in the upper cup holder you wouldnt want to keep your arm up there for fear that your hand might knock the cup out of it.
...so it too is only the perfect armrest when it is all buttoned up.
No matter what. There is NOTHING like a Benz. There is simply no substitute, only alternates.
Last edited by Barry45RPM; Oct 13, 2004 at 11:23 AM.
Good morning,
I agree Barry, let's make ourselves heard!!! After all, we are the power behind Mercedes-Benz' success as paying and interested customers. However, the interest in and willingness to pay for a Mercedes is only there as long as it lives up to its expectation and manufacturer endorsed standard of exceeding the competition in comfort, luxury, quality and reliability while offering decent handling and good performance. Personally I love the handling, comfort, and performance of my E500 and, as opposed to many other people here, have not had any major quality or reliability issues. However, it should be in Mercedes' interest to find an amicable solution to satisfy each and every potential customer. In the case of this console, it shouldn't be hard to offer a choice between the new and old arm rest, especially since the old one is still used in Eurospec models. C'mon Mercedes, deleting an active charcoal filter and then saying well it still has recirculation or deleting puddle lights is far worse than discontinuing a color or wheel design imho. But, as I said earlier, my salesman said that no one ist noticing or complaining about this. I guess it is up to the activists here to get things rolling. I talked to a friend wo owns a Lexus and a previous Mercedes SLK and, while he is satisfied with the car, he says the difference between Mercedes and Lexus is the customer service. He said "At Mercedes, the service area is overcrowded, there is no room to relax, and you are treated more like a number, in and out. At Lexus they take their time to make sure you are happy, in other words, they make you feel good". While I do not have major complaints to make about my dealership, I know a lot of you guys out there have. So, let's change the fact that Mercedes is unaware of this forum and thus our problems. We have the power!
Have a great day.
Then, I will discuss the VCS option fiasco. At the time of my ordered, MBUSA offered this option for $1450, which was $500 less than the same option for the 2004 model. However, the phone and cradle is not included in the 2005 price as it was in 2004. Of course, reasonably, one may conclude that the price of the phone and cradle when added to the $1450 would likely total around $2050 or so. This rational assumption is based on a few things:
1. MBUSA charged $600 for an additional phone in 2004 (v60 - CDMA)
2. $2050 is 5% greater than $1950, which even exceeds MBUSA's average annual price increase of 2.5%
3. Evolving mobile phone technology has contributed towards declining mobile phone prices
Although MBUSA offered the VCS option at $1450, there was no price set for the phone and the cradle, which were not to be available until a later date. Therefore, a responsible consumer was only left with his own rational assumption as to what the prices for those items were likely to be. I feel that my assumption was reasonable. However, now that MBUSA has released the price, after delivery of my car, the total price for the VCS option is now 37% higher ($2673) than that of the same option for 2004! THAT IS UNACCEPTABLE! If I had known this at the time of my order, I would not have ordered that option. Who would have? It is not reasonable.
Paul Halata
MBUSA Customer Assistance Center
3 Paragon Drive
Montvale, NJ 07645
Last edited by Baby Jocko; Oct 13, 2004 at 01:06 PM.
Then, I will discuss the VCS option fiasco. At the time of my ordered, MBUSA offered this option for $1450, which was $500 less than the same option for the 2004 model. However, the phone and cradle is not included in the 2005 price as it was in 2004. Of course, reasonably, one may conclude that the price of the phone and cradle when added to the $1450 would likely total around $2050 or so. This rational assumption is based on a few things:
1. MBUSA charged $600 for an additional phone in 2004 (v60 - CDMA)
2. $2050 is 5% greater than $1950, which even exceeds MBUSA's average annual price increase of 2.5%
3. Evolving mobile phone technology has contributed towards declining mobile phone prices
Although MBUSA offered the VCS option at $1450, there was no price set for the phone and the cradle, which were not to be available until a later date. Therefore, a responsible consumer was only left with his own rational assumption as to what the prices for those items were likely to be. I feel that my assumption was reasonable. However, now that MBUSA has released the price, after delivery of my car, the total price for the VCS option is now 37% higher ($2673) than that of the same option for 2004! THAT IS UNACCEPTABLE! If I had known this at the time of my order, I would not have ordered that option. Who would have? It is not reasonable.
Paul Halata
MBUSA Customer Assistance Center
3 Paragon Drive
Montvale, NJ 07645
(2) Most if not all MBUSA materials contain “MBUSA reserves the right to make changes at any time”. That said, if the dealer makes an oral or written promise to an individual buyer regarding features which would be included on the vehicle that buyer is purchasing and then the vehicle provided does not have these features, then that is a breach of contract. Since new automobiles are almost always sold with written contracts, it is up to the buyer to see to it that the written agreements include the promise for the desired features. If the buyer signed a purchase agreement without such a promise, then there is no breach of contract. The advertising is irrelevant. This is why 03 buyers were unsuccessful regarding MBUSA inability to retrofit the navigation, and the absence of 4-piston calipers for the front brakes in the e320.
(3) VCS price increase – check your Private Messages before sending your inquiry.
(1) I was told by several sources that Halata is a VP and is head of MBUSA Customer Service. If he is not the person I should direct my complaint to, then please tell me who is.
(2) Yes, it is written that “MBUSA reserves the right to make changes at any time”. However, in the case of the REST feature, for example, that is NOT a "change." That is an omission. I would think a court of law would differentiate between the two. Beyond the issue of legality, it is, without a doubt, unethical for MBUSA to present and then deliver their products in this manner. I would think that the executives of MBUSA would care to know that they have disappointed and dissatisfied customers.
Mercedes-Benz posts record sales in the U.S. in September
Sales of Mercedes-Benz vehicles in the U.S. were up once again in September, rising by a good one percent to 17,400 units. As a result, a total of 157,600 vehicles (2003: 159,400) have been delivered to customers since the beginning of the year. Sales of the E-Class (41,400 passenger cars, up by six percent), the C-Class sedan (42,800 passenger cars, up by ten percent), the CLK-Class (16,900 passenger cars, up by 19 percent) and the SL-Class (9,800 passenger cars, up by eleven percent) remain at a record level and contribute substantially to Mercedes Benz’ sales success in the United States.
http://www.daimlerchrysler.com/dccom...-0-0-0,00.html
The Best of Mercedes & AMG

Hope the physiotherapy's done a decent job on the part(s) of your anatomy requiring some TLC

Yes, of course wifey and I are excited about the delivery of the E200. The PDI (according to the sales agents, whom I've now learnt not to trust any further than I could throw them) went without a hitch - everything's simply "perfect".
The proof of the pudding is in the eating, or so they say - and I guess we'll find out in 4 days' time! We're just awaiting some minor additions - tinting of the windows (that'll be done in house, and according to the strict LTA (land transport authority) regulations here in Singapore), and parking sensors ... and in FOUR DAYS' TIME *drool*.
Yes, I'm a happy fellow
Last edited by wobbles; Oct 14, 2004 at 06:06 AM.
http://www2.autospies.com/article/in...articleId=3488
Last edited by konigstiger; Mar 9, 2007 at 03:32 PM.

hearing about charcoal filter downgrade ticks me off too. and maybe off-topic, i saw another unfortunate example with the sirius antenna drilled into trunk. wait till client sees that on his fresh delivery. are they freakin kidding??!!! its as big as fist. and sits unpainted smack on the trunk.
j.
ok, i bought the car and had it a week now.
the console is........drum roll please........
not bad!
looks pretty slick with appear wood, and is actually comfortable when closed and used as armrest. 'tambour' drawer is strong i think. its not about to fall apart. also has nice-quality stitched leather surrounding the console, which if i recall is an upgrade from
it is a bit awkward to use cupholders, but frankly i dont do it too often.
this is not enough of an issue to cancel a purchase.
rest of car is great.
other issues i had commented on:
got the sirius with a better antenna, from the dealer. smaller, and lays on the rear deck , INSIDE the car.
re the charcoal filter, was told it was incorporated into recirc function automatically goes on (?)
j.





-s-
-s-




