some questions on the E



http://www.mbusa.com/mercedes/vehicl...-E/model-E350C
The difference between the seats is the leather vs. the MB-Tex. The beige in your picture is MB-Tex the black is leather.
thanks for the reply, yes I realize now the differences n trans and shifter locations.
As for the seats, I still think the two have a slight deferent shape. Perhaps the horizontal lines make the black seats look more sporty and more bucket verses the flat, squares of the beige ones. Perhaps I'm just too used to my CLK sporty bucket seats and the ones in the E sedan's we test drove looked way too squared and flat.










Very few dealers order the luxury as the "free" Sports package is a selling point and many purchases prefer it. In reality, no real cost difference to MB or dealers regardless of which package was built into the car.
The E-wagon does not have a center shifter. Unless its an option because the standard E-wagons have column shifters. Its an SUV or mabe the R-class. But my money is on the GLK. I drove a loaner GLK for 4 weeks while I waited for my car to be replaced...
Thats a GLK!

No misinformation here!!!
In EU there is a manual option for the E's (they have tons more configurations, for example, you can get an S-Class with cloth seats, etc.).
The Best of Mercedes & AMG




At least the black seats with horizontal lines look much better to me then the vertical lines. I still can't get over the fact they moved the shifter to the steering column. I understand that technicaly it was easy as its all electronics but it just makes the car look and feel inside like some old American car. It also introduced two designs and all the extra parts along with it between the manual and auto transmissions. I think it would have been a far better decision both from the visual and parts perspective to keep it in the center console.
I admire unique designs like what Jaguar did with the XF. Why can't MB come up with something that is innovative? The steering column is lazy engineering.
Last edited by BenzE350; Nov 12, 2010 at 09:45 AM.
Since it's electronic, there's no real reason they couldn't have made a knob/lever/shifter in the center console. Must have just been one of those design things.



I admire unique designs like what Jaguar did with the XF. Why can't MB come up with something that is innovative? The steering column is lazy engineering.
The way the control wheel slides up when you start the XF adds to the experience. Same goes for the vent designs flipping over and being an integral part of and flowing with the dashboard where in the new E the vents stand out as a main design future that does not look very well designed at all to me.
If they wanted to make the E feel more luxury/limo like then that's fine with me. But then why offer a sport package version while keeping the inside the same as the luxury version? They should have used the seats and the shifter design from the new E coupe in the sport version. If one wants the bigger Mercedes that's still 4 doors and is sporty, one has to go with the CLS. But the kicker is that the 2011 CLS, being a sport sedan ALSO has the shifter now moved in to the steering column
That may have been true 20 or more years ago but by todays modern standards the mark of a sports car is simply paddle shifters or manual transmission. The center shifter in the E63 is for people who think like you. IMO once I shift the car to D the shifter should magically disappear until I am done driving and ready to shift it into P.



Since it's electronic, there's no real reason they couldn't have made a knob/lever/shifter in the center console. Must have just been one of those design things.
I wonder what people in Europe think about this new design in the automatic versions.



That may have been true 20 or more years ago but by todays modern standards the mark of a sports car is simply paddle shifters or manual transmission. The center shifter in the E63 is for people who think like you. IMO once I shift the car to D the shifter should magically disappear until I am done driving and ready to shift it into P.

We are not lucky in the US to be able to purchase manual transmission versions. I did not have that option in my CLK and I still consider it to be sporty even with its automatic transmission.
I also tend to use the manual shifting option in my automatic car and that would not be very convenient in the existing design (if it was offered).
Its also about the feel of the car. The rear spoiler in my CLK is not very functional or needed, yet it makes the car look and feel better, more sporty.
Last edited by dariusf; Nov 12, 2010 at 10:16 AM.
If MB is gonna move the shifter to the steering column then put some better engineering into the additional space saved between the seats.
The cupholders are still too small, the ash tray is almost useless for any non-smokers (other than to adapt it to coin storage), there is no place to conveniently put sunglasses, etc. The storage between the seats is huge, but not exactly efficient in terms of usage. IMO not a good design.




Looked at several cars before deciding on the E and the center console space is much larger and more practical than any I looked at.
For me, once I put it in Drive, I'm done till I put it in Park. Last two cars had console shifters with the auto/manual option. Used the manual maybe three times just to play with it. Paddle shifters are much better.
In the fifties, Chrysler products had push buttons on the dash and even had a shift lever on the dash at one point.
Shifters were moved to consoles in 60's and 70's so people would get that "sports car" feeling. Same reason they are in floor now, except for manual shifts.
All a matter of what we get used to and personal preference. Now that I am used to it, prefer the column shifter.
I traded a BMW on my car and it had terribly misplaced drink holders in the dash. MB is a great improvement.
I wonder what people in Europe think about this new design in the automatic versions.
Funnily enough when I first got the car, a valet went to shift it like the old column shifters and I thought he was going to snap it right off.
I don't know why considering I have a 2011 so it's not "brand new" as a design. I guess he never saw one.
If MB is gonna move the shifter to the steering column then put some better engineering into the additional space saved between the seats.
The cupholders are still too small, the ash tray is almost useless for any non-smokers (other than to adapt it to coin storage), there is no place to conveniently put sunglasses, etc. The storage between the seats is huge, but not exactly efficient in terms of usage. IMO not a good design.
But the cup holders are Infinitely better than the W211. At least now I can put a cup of coffee there and still rest my arm and not knock it over or have to work around it to shift. I hated the "afterthought" cup holders in the W211.



speaking of smoking, I do not, my fathers Jaguar S has ash trays in the doors that I thought was quite amusing remembering the old days. You should see the cub holder in my 2003 CLK (w209) There is one in the very inconvenient location. Not that I need or use it but had situations where I was driving with someone and we picked up coffee and had one cup holder to share
Last edited by pmb600; Nov 14, 2010 at 12:50 AM.






