2013 Interior Changes Spotted
Also, REALLY happy to see the KeylessGo a stand-alone option vs having to get the P2.
The real cool updates are the Command System and Speedo LCD. They already improved the speedo LCD screen for 2012 (Hi-res) but for 2013, the "gold and brown" motive is gone in place of a pure black background with clearer contrasting text and better use of color for dividing lines, warnings, etc. It also appears to be even sharper than the 2012. REALLY nice display.
Even better is the 2013 Command system.
First, the color scheme is improved. The "yellow and cream" daytime motive is gone. Much clearer, MUCH classier. Black backgrounds for most menus with very clear, crisp text. The BIG change though is in speed. There is clearly a change to the processor and graphics abilities as the navigation movement and screen transitions are very smooth. And the apps are a real nice touch as well.
Also, THRILLED the auto start-stop feature has NOT been added to the E350. The C and GLK have it for 2013, but not the E. For those of you who may not know, auto start-stop in non-hybrids is terrible as it literally uses the conventional starter to re-start the motor and the battery can't handle running accessories for more than 10-20 seconds before the motor starts back up.
The rest of the 2013 E appears to be the same, at least from what I could see.
Last edited by jmatero; Jul 31, 2012 at 05:05 PM.
Also, REALLY happy to see the KeylessGo a stand-alone option vs having to get the P2.
The real cool updates are the Command System and Speedo LCD. They already improved the speedo LCD screen for 2012 (Hi-res) but for 2013, the "gold and brown" motive is gone in place of a pure black background with clearer contrasting text and better use of color for dividing lines, warnings, etc. It also appears to be even sharper than the 2012. REALLY nice display.
Even better is the 2013 Command system.
First, the color scheme is improved. The "yellow and cream" daytime motive is gone. Much clearer, MUCH classier. Black backgrounds for most menus with very clear, crisp text. The BIG change though is in speed. There is clearly a change to the processor and graphics abilities as the navigation movement and screen transitions are very smooth. And the apps are a real nice touch as well.
Also, THRILLED the auto start-stop feature has NOT been added to the E350. The C and GLK have it for 2013, but not the E. For those of you who may not know, auto start-stop in non-hybrids is terrible as it literally uses the conventional starter to re-start the motor and the battery can't handle running accessories for more than 10-20 seconds before the motor starts back up.
The rest of the 2013 E appears to be the same, at least from what I could see.
Year 2013.
mbrace2 adds the Internet and Mercedes-Benz Apps, more remote vehicle access features, and over-the-air diagnostic capabilities to today’s already impressive array of safety, destination planning and convenience services.
Highlights:
• Internet browsing and Mercedes-Benz Apps, including Google Local Search with
Street View and Panoramic high-resolution photos, Yelp, Facebook and News. And
others planned for later.
• “Family Services” that cleverly take advantage of GPS, recording and mobile alert
technologies, including Driving Journal, Travel Zones and Speed Alert.
• mbrace Mobile App for iPhone and Android Version 4.0. New version introduces
Remote Horn & Lights and Valet Protect features.
• Vehicle Diagnostic Health Report on the mbrace Mobile App, MBUSA.com Owners
Online and via email.
Besides introducing the exciting new features above, mbrace2 is significant because it
leverages “Cloud technology” to bring the Apps into Mercedes-Benz vehicles, which
enables the newest versions to be wirelessly beamed into all cars on the road. All MB
Apps are engineered to the stringent Mercedes-Benz guidelines for sensible operation and
to minimize driver distraction as other in-vehicle systems like hands-free phone and navi.
An all-new new mbrace2 control module will be installed as standard equipment on all model
year 2013 Mercedes-Benz passenger vehicles except S-Class and CL-Class, which will
continue with first-generation mbrace hardware until their all-new successor models debut
in a year or so. Earlier model year vehicles are incompatible with the new mbrace2
hardware and cannot be retrofitted.
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Went to the dealer today and the 2013 NTG4.5 moves as fast as my 2011 NTG4.5. The speed is the same for me. I also have apps on my 2011. The hardware for COMAND is exactly the same except with a 3G mbrace2 connection now. Other than that, all the hardware is exactly the same. I doubt that you need a 3G module to get software updates on the same NTG4.5 system
Anyone else have info on this?
So why is this a useful function. Sounds like marketing hype of a solution looking for a problem.
I'm looking forward to the day when there is a slot in the dash by the push button start. You get in, buckle up, slide your iPhone into the slot, and start the car. Then, a heads-up display and Siri do the rest. Your car is always up to date. And manufacturers can invest that $$$ in making better cars, which is what they do best. Leave the tech for the tech companies. No screens out of line-of-sight, no touch screens or knobs, etc. just a Siri button on the wheel.
Unfortunately, Navigation Systems in cars are such a huge cash cow that I don't see that happening any time soon. Besides, these slow incremental updates make people want to buy the next car.
I'd prefer Benz go the Siri/iPhone slot route and invest that dough in steering with better feedback, etc.
Wireless charging is coming to all phones in the future so in the not so distant future you can likely keep your phone in your pocket and when you are in the car it will wirelessly charge AND link to the car's telematics system for iInternet access, phone and address book access, software updates etc.,
I really hope the day will not come where the E class becomes a glorified iPhone dock. There are plenty of people who are quite happy not owning an iPhone
Just wanted you to be aware there are other people out there with different tastes in phones I'm looking forward to the day when there is a slot in the dash by the push button start. You get in, buckle up, slide your iPhone into the slot, and start the car. Then, a heads-up display and Siri do the rest. Your car is always up to date. And manufacturers can invest that $$$ in making better cars, which is what they do best. Leave the tech for the tech companies. No screens out of line-of-sight, no touch screens or knobs, etc. just a Siri button on the wheel.
Unfortunately, Navigation Systems in cars are such a huge cash cow that I don't see that happening any time soon. Besides, these slow incremental updates make people want to buy the next car.
I'd prefer Benz go the Siri/iPhone slot route and invest that dough in steering with better feedback, etc.
Last edited by K-A; Aug 2, 2012 at 04:09 AM.
Also I'm not sure if you were aware of this but as of Q1, 2012 Android accounts for 59% (*1) of the smartphone market share. If not 59%, I bet about half of the Mercedes customers use an Android-based phone so it would make sense for Mercedes to implement an interface that does not leave out half or the majority of the installed smartphones.
Freedom of choice is a good thing

---
(*1) source:
http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/24/i...rtphone-share/
http://www.fastcompany.com/1840149/d...general-motors
http://www.appleinsider.com/articles...lass_line.html
http://mashable.com/2012/02/27/mercedes-benz-siri/
http://www.pcworld.com/article/25087..._new_cars.html
Developing for Android or Windows Phone is a nightmare because the hardware is all different as is the software. Just because something works on a Samsung phone with Android vX.X doesn't keen it works on a Motorola phone with Android vX.X. And that costs $$$, and makes support a nightmare. If a carmaker wants to update something and test it with a new iPhone 4S, it's pretty much guaranteed to work with every other Apple device out there. Develop for Android and change something and HTC guys scream it's not working, Samsung guys say it IS working and Motorola is hit/miss.
Bluetooth isn't at a point where music streams at a high enough quality (for most) and until it does, only a direct connection will do. Add to that the battery drain streaming, say, Pandora sans-cable and people need to plug it in anyway just for juice.
A Siri button on the steering wheel will sell cars and iPhones, no question. If Google ever gets to a point where there's one version of Android on all 50-something percent of the smart phone market, perhaps car makers would invest the time and $. I'm not criticizing Android, just stating why no carmakers are jumping on that bandwagon.
Last edited by jmatero; Aug 3, 2012 at 01:06 AM.
With Apple, it's a tight system, so everything can work as expected from both the Apple and car manufacturers sides.
Then, apple did screw up again WITHOUTH prior notice (again) by releasing work with iphone which requires a propietory chip must be installed in any work with iphone device. This chip just meant to remove that dreaded message "your hardware/device is not compatible with this phone thingy".
Apple is not flawless, neither is all other manufacturer.
Agreed with WEBSRFR, sounds more logical to me.









