E-Class (W212) 2010 - 2016: E 350, E 550

2012 Bluetec only marginally more efficient than gas version

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 09-11-2012, 07:31 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
C280driv3r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
w202
2012 Bluetec only marginally more efficient than gas version

The gas version is also cheaper and has nearly 100 more HP

Can anybody explain the rationale behind this pricing?
Old 09-11-2012, 07:36 PM
  #2  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
BM2BZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Paradise
Posts: 2,056
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
w212 E550
i think it's the same reason why people buying hybrids.
Old 09-11-2012, 07:50 PM
  #3  
Super Member
 
dfordham's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 561
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2014 E350, 2012 SL550
Originally Posted by C280driv3r
The gas version is also cheaper and has nearly 100 more HP

Can anybody explain the rationale behind this pricing?
In the real world experience of members here, the oil burner is considerably more fuel efficient.

While down in horsepower, the diesel has WAY more torque. Unless you're a boy racer, the torque will make the diesel feel more powerful in most everyday driving. Remember the saying: "You race horsepower, you drive torque".

Regards,
Don
Old 09-11-2012, 09:46 PM
  #4  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Arrie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Southern US
Posts: 4,488
Received 888 Likes on 638 Posts
2010 E550, 273 Engine: 2012 S550, 278 Engine
Originally Posted by dfordham
In the real world experience of members here, the oil burner is considerably more fuel efficient.

While down in horsepower, the diesel has WAY more torque. Unless you're a boy racer, the torque will make the diesel feel more powerful in most everyday driving. Remember the saying: "You race horsepower, you drive torque".

Regards,
Don

dfordham is right.

What moves the car is not the horse power, it is the force, i.e. the torque from the engine.

Horse power explains how fast you can get that torque from the engine.

Horse power is a "man made" unit to explain the power of a car or something but it can be very misleading.

For example, you can harness a 400 hp Lamborghini sports car in front of a blow on a flied and I doubt it could move it. In another token, you can harness a 60 hp Lamborghini farming tractor from the very same company in front of that same blow and it would not have no difficulties to move it.

With these cars higher horse power only matters when you take the car to close to its max speed, i.e. to 150 mph or even higher. That is where the diesel powered car will lose it.

Well, here in the U.S. we can only dream about driving those speeds. Our limis are so low that the diesel actually has a very good chance to beat the gasoline version. They are very close with the diesel having a way better fuel mileage.

Fuel mileage difference is huge in favor for the diesel especially in city driving.
Old 09-12-2012, 09:09 AM
  #5  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
ImInPA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Central Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,747
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 11 Posts
2012 S350 Bluetec 4Matic, Diamond White, P2
The diesels are far more fuel efficient in the real world than their EPA stickers would suggest. Your post makes a statement that is patently false. I think your knowledge of what you speak is more than marginally deficient.
Old 09-12-2012, 10:04 AM
  #6  
Super Member
 
Mbenz260e's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 594
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
2021 S580 Prior: 2012 E350 Bluetec, 2013 GL350 Bluetec, 2009 ML320 Bluetec, 2006 E320 CDI, 1987 260E
Compare on Fuelly.com and you will see real world results on the diesel vs. gas.

My ML320 & E350 diesels gets better mileage than the C300 loaners I get, both on the computer and calculated at the pump.

The diesel to me definitely feels more powerful than the gas version though perhaps I am just used to the diesel. I drove a gasser E350 recently and felt a bit anemic but then again probably just used to the diesel power curve.

When I used to have a gasser Volvo S60, I found it ironic how the ML320 SUV was the more economical choice when driving.
Old 09-12-2012, 12:10 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
thekurgan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 333
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
E350 BT
Originally Posted by ImInPA
The diesels are far more fuel efficient in the real world than their EPA stickers would suggest. Your post makes a statement that is patently false. I think your knowledge of what you speak is more than marginally deficient.
Agree 100%. Passing power on the highway, while still maintaining 36+ mpg has to be experienced over the gas variant as well.
Old 09-12-2012, 01:08 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
troymir350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Michigan
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 10 Posts
2019 AMG GLE 63S
I agree with all the above, and at least where I live diesel is $0.30 LESS than regular gas. Now, it isn't always that much less but it has been like this for a while now.

So, when I do the math it is a dramatic difference between $3.99 for diesel and $4.49(ish) for premium. And the performance as noted.
Old 09-14-2012, 09:49 AM
  #9  
Junior Member
 
raylee177's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
E350 BT, E320, 528i
Diesel owner know value of owning a diesel car better than gas car owners. After 9 months of owning BlueTec, I love it more and more. The car is turbine smooth.
Old 09-14-2012, 09:56 AM
  #10  
K-A
Out Of Control!!
 
K-A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 10,557
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 18 Posts
Porsche Macan S SportDesign / Ex M-B's: 11 & 10 & 06 E350's, 02 S500
Don't forget, you can Lease a Diesel for about the price of a loaded Camry these days, as well (negates whatever closeness there may or may not be to the Gas version in MPG anyway).
Old 09-14-2012, 02:48 PM
  #11  
Super Member
 
ghstudio's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 655
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Mercedes e350 BlueTec
my 2011 blutec has gotten 28 mpg averaging 27.5mph over the past 7500 miles. What are the real life numbers for a gas car that averages 27.5mph?

My fuel cost has been about .03-.05 more than premium fuel plus the bluetec cost of $40 for the 7500 miles or another $.005 per mile.

Now tell me about the gas 2012/2013 cars....

Did I mention that I lease my car on a 24 mo 12K mile lease and pay under $500 a month including tax (no money down) for the car?

So now compare total cost over 2 years....gas vs diesel. Then you can compare the financials of the two cars.

Last edited by ghstudio; 09-14-2012 at 03:01 PM.
Old 09-14-2012, 07:25 PM
  #12  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Nuru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,904
Received 26 Likes on 26 Posts
S350 BT 4MATIC
I would imagine that the Diesel-engined cars get quite a bit better all around and freeway cruising mpg. If they did not, they would not be getting sold nor would they be produced by MB. It is like comparing a gas tractor and a diesel tractor - gph - diesel wins easily.
Old 09-14-2012, 07:50 PM
  #13  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Nuru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,904
Received 26 Likes on 26 Posts
S350 BT 4MATIC
Originally Posted by ghstudio
my 2011 blutec has gotten 28 mpg averaging 27.5mph over the past 7500 miles. What are the real life numbers for a gas car that averages 27.5mph?

My fuel cost has been about .03-.05 more than premium fuel plus the bluetec cost of $40 for the 7500 miles or another $.005 per mile.

Now tell me about the gas 2012/2013 cars....

Did I mention that I lease my car on a 24 mo 12K mile lease and pay under $500 a month including tax (no money down) for the car?

So now compare total cost over 2 years....gas vs diesel. Then you can compare the financials of the two cars.
I am gonna buy a diesel version when I grow up
Old 09-14-2012, 09:55 PM
  #14  
Junior Member
 
raylee177's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
E350 BT, E320, 528i
No phony story! I am really getting 40 miles plus per gallon on HWY with my 2012 BlueTec. I do know EPA estimate is only 32 HWY.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: 2012 Bluetec only marginally more efficient than gas version



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:47 PM.