Ratings for CLA




Consumer Reports had a report on it and ranked it very low. They also placed it on their worst cars reviewed in 2013 list.
While CR has its own biases, it is still a responsible organization that has been testing and reporting on cars for many decades.
This low result on a brand new car makes me wonder (again) if DBAG/MB are trying to develop and manufacture too many different types of cars and models, some at very low production levels.




just do an a-class or b-class and designate the vehicles as cost/fuel efficient but with the brand's special blend of luxury, safety, and build quality.
or do this car right, and put it under the CLK moniker.
Last edited by E Classy; Jan 9, 2014 at 08:03 PM.




Why buy one:
- Looks fantastic
- The powerful lure of the three-pointed star
- Attractive tease of a sub-$30,000 starting sticker price
- 28 mpg is rather fuel-efficient
- Lacks the handling, ride, and refinement expected from a Mercedes-Benz
- Very cramped interior
- Despite good performance numbers, car can feel sluggish to drive
- Difficult driver visibility
- Really hard to get in or out
- Tiny trunk opening
I can't disagree with any of it. We all can dislike it as much as we want the market will vote with their wallet and if early sales are any indication the CLA will do just fine in the US.
What you have to remember is that MB has been successful with their A and B class vehicle offerings in Europe so it's only the stuck-up North Americans who live in the delusional world of MB = luxury. And that delusion will actually play rather nicely with the $30k price point to lure new buyers in.
Remember folks, the typical E-class owner is not the target market for the CLA and for some of us it's hard to understand why anyone would buy one. If we could understand then maybe we'd be the target market.
As an anecdotal story a friend of mine went to check out the CLA and ended up buying a used C-class instead with 10k miles on the odo. She loved the way the car looked, got her in the dealership but she hated exactly the same things that CR hated: tiny interior and horrible visibility.
Trending Topics
What you have to remember is that MB has been successful with their A and B class vehicle offerings in Europe so it's only the stuck-up North Americans who live in the delusional world of MB = luxury. And that delusion will actually play rather nicely with the $30k price point to lure new buyers in.
Remember folks, the typical E-class owner is not the target market for the CLA and for some of us it's hard to understand why anyone would buy one. If we could understand then maybe we'd be the target market.
For many years, the B Class has and continues to be very successful in Canada. Now, where I live, the CLA is backordered, with wait times of up to 9 months for the AMG version !!
While the CLA may not be the E Class buyers' cup of tea, it seems to have found a very significant market in North America, with recent US monthly sales of some 6000 units ! The CLA is one reason why MB sales in the US for 2013 were up by 14% for the year and 17% for December.
And for those naysayers of the face-lifted E Class, its US sales increased by an astonishing 25% for December, far outselling the 5 Series !!! In fact, in the same month, the E Class outsold the C Class !!!
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
i don't believe the CLA will last very long, but we'll see. there's a apparently a market segment for everything these days. the GLA is another question mark. who could possibly want that? the GLK is certainly small enough.








The larger ground clearance is absolutely unnecessary for 99% of the people, snow or not, whose cars will never ever leave the pavement, on purpose, ever.
The larger ground clearance is absolutely unnecessary for 99% of the people, snow or not, whose cars will never ever leave the pavement, on purpose, ever.
Even though the CLA is not even close to the quality standard of the C or E Classes, it is attracting a new and younger group of buyers to the brand. E Classy may be right in saying " I don't believe the CLA will last very long." But who really knows at this point ? What is true is that the GLK has been a huge success for MB in North America.
Last edited by DerekACS; Jan 10, 2014 at 05:46 PM.
i'm against creating too many variants to create niche markets that don't actually exist until those variants are announced, and then people convince themselves after the public relations techniques are applied that they ought to be driving one. that is the gripe with the CLA - it doesn't make sense without the lure.
perhaps the numbers are better when you have a bigger portfolio of blended crap rather than a smaller portfolio of strict quality. there has to be a reason everyone is building so many goofball cars these days.
BMW failed with 318ti
Mercedes failed with C230K Coupe
I guess not bringing the regular A/B class is to avoid playing in the mud with VW GTi game.
Your choice in vehicles is the only right one! Everyone else is stupid!
Good Job Guys... Now break out your smoking pipe, put on your slippers, and go chase the Jehovah's Witnesses away from your 30ft gold plated front gate.
So while an SUV may not suit your needs or my needs (I also have an E-Wagon), it does suit needs of some other folks.
Similarly I know several younger folks who are a year or two out of college in their first jobs and have a need for a nice new car. the CLA is at a price point they can afford. They don't need a large car as they are single. They don't necessarily need all the leather and wood of a C or E class either.
Nothing wrong with MB trying to get into other markets. Once you get used to driving European vehicles, its hard to drive anything else. Getting those young folks into an entry MB will likely help keep them in the MB family down the road.




