E350 vs. TL
Presumably the 2012 Acura TL is still under warranty, so it would likely be a better long term bet.
If you are really set on owning an E Class, I would look for one that is in excellent condition, has low miles and is CPO. You would have to obviously pay more for such a car than one that is not CPO. The good news is that there is a wide choice of CPO E350 from which to choose. Suggest you go to MBUSA website and select Pre-owned inventory, click on 'E350' and you will see what is on offer from all of the MB dealers in the USA ! There will likely be several 100s of cars offered.
Good luck with your hunt !
Presumably the 2012 Acura TL is still under warranty, so it would likely be a better long term bet.
If you are really set on owning an E Class, I would look for one that is in excellent condition, has low miles and is CPO. You would have to obviously pay more for such a car than one that is not CPO. The good news is that there is a wide choice of CPO E350 from which to choose. Suggest you go to MBUSA website and select Pre-owned inventory, click on 'E350' and you will see what is on offer from all of the MB dealers in the USA ! There will likely be several 100s of cars offered.
Good luck with your hunt !




Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Take Derek's suggestion and look at the full preowned inventory available, you may be surprised. Acura may be low on maintenance cost though.
Take Derek's suggestion and look at the full preowned inventory available, you may be surprised. Acura may be low on maintenance cost though.
The bad news is it's not as luxurious as the E350 OR as sporty as the TL.
So if you can not find a CPO benz for the same as the TL certified, your not looking hard enough yet.
Benz is definately more "solid", I personally don't like the TL looks, and acura is suffering heavily with there sedan sales. Drops every month. They are scrambling to fix, but can not get it right. Even the new RLX is a poor seller. (which is a more direct competitor to the E350)
Both should be about $29000 certified, max $30k.
Acura has been suffering ever since they enjoyed some initial success with the Legend. Their designs have always a bit off.
I could say the same for the vast majority of Japanese sedans. How is it that a country known for superlative designs in architecture, sculpture, ceramics, and gardens can be so challenged when it comes to the aesthetics of car design ?
Most folks consider japanese namely Toyotas reliable but Toyotas are involved in catasprophic failures like unintended acceleration .
Last edited by bigigg; Mar 4, 2014 at 07:57 AM.




Regardless, the E is a RWD adapted to AWD, so no different than a FWD adapted to AWD. TL's are great cars and reliability is far superior to anything MB makes. Check out Consumer Reports reliability if that is a concern. Also, Truedelta.com.
You might want to check out pre-owned RL's as they are usually very low cost. The RL is Acura's top line vehicle, but has never sold very well so discounted a lot when new or used.
BTW, TL is being replaced with a TLX.
Acuras are know for road noise, so you need to test for that. E's are generally quiter, but you do get tire noise on rough roads.
As for problems, such as Toyota's, been driving them for years and many miles with no problems. If one occurs, they fix it free. Can't say the same for MB.
I do enjoy my E and opted not to get a new Acura RL for less than I paid for my E when I purchased.



