








Vote Pano vs Traditional
On the other side of the coin, it takes too much time to open the roof because I have to open the motorized screen first. Furthermore, I can't tilt the roof open while keeping the sunscreen closed (kinda like keeping a non-motorized, old school sliding cover partially open with the roof tilted to increase airflow in the cabin without letting in much light).
My Pano occasionally creaks, but it doesn't bother me. A catastrophic glass shattering event crosses my mind from time to time, but then I have a drink and that ugly thought goes away.
For the record, I voted FOR the Pano roof because the question was independent of price. When dollars and cents are considered, I would NOT be willing to spend $11-13K (much less $5K) for it. Who would do a thing like that?!
Last edited by Johnny Rad; May 7, 2015 at 03:00 PM.
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Cheaper, Matches paint job, I dont often carry rear passengers whose perfect vision of the sky above me is my concern AND ive heard it is noisier when driving on the fwy with it open versus the regular.
Pano is beautiful (with the right color combo, as some people said); I like magic sky control better =D




or re-open by itself on hot days.
A real fix has still not been found...
(*) 2009 C / 2012 E coupe / 2015 E sedan



