E-Class (W212) 2010 - 2016: E 350, E 550
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

E class sets canonball run record

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Dec 7, 2019 | 11:07 PM
  #1  
ghlkal's Avatar
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 1,071
Likes: 349
From: Fredonia, WI
2012 E550 v8-Biturbo
E class sets canonball run record

OK, it was an E63, but it's still a great story about the virtues of the E class

These Guys Just Drove an E63 AMG Across America in a Record 27 Hours 25 Minutes


https://www.roadandtrack.com/car-cul...=pocket-newtab

Reply
Old Dec 7, 2019 | 11:10 PM
  #2  
cadetdrivr's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,053
Likes: 355
From: USA - Minnesota
2014 GL350
I can't think of a better choice of auto for such an attempt.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2019 | 09:14 AM
  #3  
RA72825's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,957
Likes: 1,640
I saw that. Impressive, considering they had to encounter traffic and probably scared the crap out of more than just a few in their way.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2019 | 12:30 PM
  #4  
kajtek1's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 9,224
Likes: 1,797
From: V E G A S
1922 Ford Model T / no OBD
Originally Posted by cadetdrivr
I can't think of a better choice of auto for such an attempt.
I can >>> diesel would save them about 2 hr from the time at fuel pumps
Such records boil to Law Enforcement on the road.
I've been doing cross-country drive every few years and in the past, going on central I-80 who has 75 mph, I could set CC to 100 mph and not disengage it for over 1 hr.
Last time I did it like 5 years ago and Nebraska cops start making radar traps
Same with NV. I frequent San Francisco -Las Vegas route for 30 years and when in the past CHP was having lot of car-mounted radars (in CA making speed traps is against the law) -Nevada never ever had radars on freeways.
Than since I moved to Vegas 3 years ago, I see radars on the freeway.

Last edited by kajtek1; Dec 8, 2019 at 12:36 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2019 | 12:43 PM
  #5  
kajtek1's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 9,224
Likes: 1,797
From: V E G A S
1922 Ford Model T / no OBD
Than reading it again, I smell
They say 22 minutes spend on fueling total.
Rough calculation - they had to burn about 300 gallons of gas. US gas pump are limited to 10 gallons/minute, so just running the fuel would take over 30 minutes. What about pulling-in and paying?
They did not do potty stops YEEK.

Last edited by kajtek1; Dec 8, 2019 at 12:55 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2019 | 01:21 PM
  #6  
cadetdrivr's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,053
Likes: 355
From: USA - Minnesota
2014 GL350
Originally Posted by kajtek1
Than reading it again, I smell
They say 22 minutes spend on fueling total.
Rough calculation - they had to burn about 300 gallons of gas. US gas pump are limited to 10 gallons/minute, so just running the fuel would take over 30 minutes.
What if they started with a full tank?
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2019 | 01:47 PM
  #7  
kajtek1's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 9,224
Likes: 1,797
From: V E G A S
1922 Ford Model T / no OBD
Originally Posted by cadetdrivr
What if they started with a full tank?
They added tank in the trunk, so maybe they started with 40 gallons of fuel, but than the 300 gallons for the trip is very low estimate.
Would love to hear from E63 owner what's the mpg at 160 mph.
Last time I drove E320 wagon at 130 mph, the cluster was showing like 12 mpg.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2019 | 01:56 PM
  #8  
RA72825's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,957
Likes: 1,640
I think they had refuelers. No gas station stops
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2019 | 02:03 PM
  #9  
kajtek1's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 9,224
Likes: 1,797
From: V E G A S
1922 Ford Model T / no OBD
Originally Posted by KEY08
I think they had refuelers. No gas station stops
They show picture of FlyingJ fueling.
I know NASCAR cars have like 8" fuel caps with strong guy dumping fuel from special can in just few seconds, but don't think this applies here.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2019 | 03:48 PM
  #10  
Bhopkins's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2018
Posts: 175
Likes: 74
From: Tremonton, Utah
2014 E350 Sport 4Matic Sedan
Originally Posted by kajtek1
Than reading it again, I smell
They say 22 minutes spend on fueling total.
Rough calculation - they had to burn about 300 gallons of gas. US gas pump are limited to 10 gallons/minute, so just running the fuel would take over 30 minutes. What about pulling-in and paying?
They did not do potty stops YEEK.
They had a total of 66 gallon fuel capacity. They only had to stop for fuel 4 times. They filled up with 2 pumps running at the same time by using the hoses from both sides of a pump. In order to speed up the fueling process, spotters would be at the gas station ahead of time to make sure pump lanes were available. On at least 1 of the fuel stops, a spotter had the pumps ready and was standing with fuel nozzles in hand when they pulled up. The driving team was able to go straight for potty breaks while the spotters pumped the gas. Think pit crew type timing.

If you are correct about the 10 gal/min pump speed, the 2 hose method would have made it possible to top off even fully empty tanks in under 4 minutes, especially when the spotters had everything ready for them. The 22 minutes would have averaged out to 5 1/2 minutes per fuel stop. Totally realistic using the planning and preparation that they had put into the run.

Last edited by Bhopkins; Dec 8, 2019 at 03:50 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2019 | 08:35 PM
  #11  
kajtek1's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 9,224
Likes: 1,797
From: V E G A S
1922 Ford Model T / no OBD
When pit crew would explain the fast fueling, it would be only fair to mention that in the article?
Than the picture shows single hose.
Bottom line, sounds like there might be hundreds of people involved in breaking the record.They should get some credits?
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2019 | 09:30 PM
  #12  
DFWdude's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,694
Likes: 1,828
From: Dallas-Ft.Worth,TX
2016 E350 Sport
Last week, we here in Dallas were treated to helicopter coverage of a 50-minute, live chase of a tool in a maroon, Mercedes CLS500(ish). Wrong way on the interstates, several u-turns across grass Interstate medians, 80mph in subdivisions, running stop lights, skirting around stop strips, etc. At times, he slowed enough on the Interstate to stand through the sunroof to taunt the armada of police cars behind. That was special.

I couldn't wait for the cops to stop him. Luckily no one got hurt (on camera, at least).

Doesn't speak well for Mercedes drivers among people looking to throw rocks at Mercedes drivers. Cool as it might seem, nor does this Cross Country record, frankly. Of course, I'm the only one who feels that way...

Last edited by DFWdude; Dec 8, 2019 at 09:52 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2019 | 10:05 PM
  #13  
kajtek1's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 9,224
Likes: 1,797
From: V E G A S
1922 Ford Model T / no OBD
You can look at it from several angles, but ask yourself why you don't hear about bad drivers on "no speed limits" autobahns?
I spend "some time" on autobahns and it come right away to me.
It is called natural selection.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2019 | 10:20 PM
  #14  
DFWdude's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,694
Likes: 1,828
From: Dallas-Ft.Worth,TX
2016 E350 Sport
Yes, I suppose I agree. But your description is of a standard configuration sedan on the highway.

All I can fathom is 66 gallons of fuel (560lbs @ 8.34lbs per gallon) plus the weight of two extra tanks (say another 60-80 lbs with mounts and plumbing), presumably in trunk and in place of rear seat. That much weight precariously balanced above and behind the rear wheels... a giant fuel tank flying along 70-75mph interstates at more than twice the allowable speed is cringe-worthy to me.

I've travelled all the roads they used from Ohio to points West. All it would take is one decent pot hole at an unseen, 160mph closure rate to lauch that bomb to who knows where.

Interesting to read, but fool-hardy if not insane.

Last edited by DFWdude; Dec 8, 2019 at 10:29 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2019 | 10:46 PM
  #15  
Peachy's Avatar
Super Member
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 584
Likes: 147
From: Bay Area, CA
2010 E550
"These were people who drove hundreds of miles in many cases just to scout the road ahead of the fast-moving AMG for a stretch and let the team know of any police activity or other hazards ahead."

The scouts probably looked for potholes too. Not really insane when you think about how much planning they did.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2019 | 11:26 PM
  #16  
Bhopkins's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2018
Posts: 175
Likes: 74
From: Tremonton, Utah
2014 E350 Sport 4Matic Sedan
Originally Posted by kajtek1
When pit crew would explain the fast fueling, it would be only fair to mention that in the article?
Than the picture shows single hose.
Bottom line, sounds like there might be hundreds of people involved in breaking the record.They should get some credits?
There is much more detail given in a few vinwiki Youtube videos. Video shows the two gas filler hoses filling the two tanks. If I recall correctly, there were 18 "spotter" crews that volunteered to assist. When it was learned that the driving team was going to make a Cannonball Run attempt, there were a lot of people across the country that volunteered to participate. The lead driver does acknowledge all the effort that these people contributed towards their success. Just because it wasn't in the single article that you glanced over doesn't mean it wasn't done.

It may be wise to take the time to more thoroughly research the run before nitpicking and casting doubt.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2019 | 12:16 AM
  #17  
kajtek1's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 9,224
Likes: 1,797
From: V E G A S
1922 Ford Model T / no OBD
Originally Posted by DFWdude
Yes, I suppose I agree. But your description is of a standard configuration sedan on the highway.

All I can fathom is 66 gallons of fuel (560lbs @ 8.34lbs per gallon) plus the weight of two extra tanks (say another 60-80 lbs with mounts and plumbing), presumably in trunk and in place of rear seat. That much weight precariously balanced above and behind the rear wheels... a giant fuel tank flying along 70-75mph interstates at more than twice the allowable speed is cringe-worthy to me.

I've travelled all the roads they used from Ohio to points West. All it would take is one decent pot hole at an unseen, 160mph closure rate to lauch that bomb to who knows where.

Interesting to read, but fool-hardy if not insane.
If you look into some archives, don't recall the exact years, but about 10 years ago 3 Las Vegas policemen lost their life on city streets.
-1st one was responding to domestic dispute call and flipped his cruiser at 70 mph when somebody cut him out on intersection
-2nd accident killed 2 cops when they have been driving 100 mph on city street and again -got cut off at intersection.
Like I said - natural selection does the job when you let it.

EDIT. The original article giving details can no longer be found, but here is a link to aftermath https://s3.amazonaws.com/destination...aign-final.pdf

Last edited by kajtek1; Dec 9, 2019 at 08:25 PM.
Reply

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:13 AM.