2017 Mercedes Benz E43 AMG Makes First U.S Stop in NYC
M




M

Embrace progress. There's always the classics if you don't want to. I appreciate the technology MB, BMW, and some others put out there for us. Being a Toyota is much more profitable, with very outdated technology and low performance engines/trannys.
1. Based on the upcoming E43's 0-60 4.5 sec numbers, its a full 1/2 sec quicker than 2014 E550 (remember E550 has both HP and torque advantage). Why? W213 will be lighter and its one of the reasons.
2. Look at the current C300 and even GLC300 0-60 numbers vs. E350 0-60 numbers. Which one is quicker? Why? The weight again is one of the reasons.
Its not the HP that moves you off the line as much as the torque per lb. The 4cyl in W213 E300 has identical torque to V6 in W212 E350, but will have lighter weight among its advantages. Capisce?




There is no way a 2014 TT E550 4matic is a 5 second car. Since you're too lazy to do your own DD, here you go:
http://www.zeroto60times.com/vehicle...-60-mph-times/ - 4.3-4.6
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...ic-test-review - 4.5
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...an-test-review 4.3
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...an-test-review - 212 E350 4matic 5.8 60 4150 lbs (100+ lbs heavier than GLC300)
http://www.caranddriver.com/mercedes-benz/glc-class - GLC300 4matic 5.9 60 , .3 seconds slower in a rolling start
http://www.motortrend.com/news/2017-...-drive-review/ - W213 E300 0-60 6.2 ; 4100lbs
It'll be fun to watch 2012 + E550s line up and wipe the floor with the E43 "amg". There will be no victories at the stoplight for an E300 either. I don't even have a dog in this fight, I drive a 211 diesel (with 130 ft/lbs more torque than the E300 stock, before I chipped it). In fact, I bet I would wipe the floor with an E300.
So thank you for your valuable input. Clearly you've become an expert with your three.. no four MBs. Since I took 5 minutes to do some "DD" for you, how about you attempt to back up your ramblings next time, Capisce?
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
There is no way a 2014 TT E550 4matic is a 5 second car. Since you're too lazy to do your own DD, here you go:
http://www.zeroto60times.com/vehicle...-60-mph-times/ - 4.3-4.6
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...ic-test-review - 4.5
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...an-test-review 4.3
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...an-test-review - 212 E350 4matic 5.8 60 4150 lbs (100+ lbs heavier than GLC300)
http://www.caranddriver.com/mercedes-benz/glc-class - GLC300 4matic 5.9 60 , .3 seconds slower in a rolling start
http://www.motortrend.com/news/2017-...-drive-review/ - W213 E300 0-60 6.2 ; 4100lbs
It'll be fun to watch 2012 + E550s line up and wipe the floor with the E43 "amg". There will be no victories at the stoplight for an E300 either. I don't even have a dog in this fight, I drive a 211 diesel (with 130 ft/lbs more torque than the E300 stock, before I chipped it). In fact, I bet I would wipe the floor with an E300.
So thank you for your valuable input. Clearly you've become an expert with your three.. no four MBs. Since I took 5 minutes to do some "DD" for you, how about you attempt to back up your ramblings next time, Capisce?
The only problem with all these facts is that there are none presented for the E43 because we don't know how that car will test yet. Wipe the floor? I think not, that is utter nonsense. The E550 will surely fall flat on its face at the first corner compared to the E43 and it is saddled with an outdated 7-speed transmission too. So yeah if the E550 is like .2 of a sec quicker to 60mph great, but wiping the floor with the E43 is just pure bull****. If all it takes is a few tenths to 60 to qualify as wiping the floor (while the rest of the E550 doesn't touch the new E) then so be it. It just seems pretty juvenile/tacky for a Benz owners.
M
Last edited by Germancar1; May 26, 2016 at 10:02 AM.
Call your dealer, I am sure the same cars are available there. MB is not stupid. You can't go from a 4cyl to AMG with nothing in between.
M
Call your dealer, I am sure the same cars are available there. MB is not stupid. You can't go from a 4cyl to AMG with nothing in between.




This car will be great, but it shouldn't be branded as an AMG.
As a side note, I think the first time this was tried was with the CLK 430 Facelift Convertible. All CLK430 facelift convertibles were sold with an AMG suspension, wheels and body kit, but anyone that threw an AMG badge on them were rightfully laughed at.
M
M



