A four cylinder engine ?




On the rare occasions that I've needed/wanted to accelerate rapidly, I've felt that the car had plenty of power. There are plenty of purchasing considerations beyond engine power.





I've driven several C-Class and E-Class loaners with turbo 4s, and they offered plenty of zip for normal traffic.
Last edited by DFWdude; Nov 12, 2019 at 10:31 PM.




Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG

https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews...c-test-review/
https://www.zeroto60times.com/vehicl...-60-mph-times/




That could translate to 6 seconds for the 4matic and perhaps 5.7-5.8 second 0-60 time for the RWD version, the latter comparing quite favorably in the dash with the 302 hp 2016 model.

That could translate to 6 seconds for the 4matic and perhaps 5.7-5.8 second 0-60 time for the RWD version, the latter comparing quite favorably in the dash with the 302 hp 2016 model.
https://www.kbb.com/car-news/2020-me...50/2100007782/




I'm curious to see what numbers Mercedes eventually posts and also what professional reviewers who independently test a W213 report. If C&D is correct that they anticipate a half-second improvement in their numbers we could actually see a sub 6.0 second 0-60 run with the RWD and near 6.0 seconds for the 4Matic, essentially what Rraisley was told.

I'm curious to see what numbers Mercedes eventually posts and also what professional reviewers who independently test a W213 report. If C&D is correct that they anticipate a half-second improvement in their numbers we could actually see a sub 6.0 second 0-60 run with the RWD and near 6.0 seconds for the 4Matic, essentially what Rraisley was told.




For Us ? we want power!!! and for that they make the AMG versions and 450 etc.....
The 4 cyl E300 I thought went pretty good... for those people just looking for the above




But bottom line of the whole discussion is: E300/350 is adequate, even peppy, for many if not most drivers. And those that want more power, have many other options to get it. Do I /need/ an E450? No. Do I /want/ an E450? Yes. Moot point, though, as I ordered a wagon, which, surprisingly, starts with the E450. Some feel the /need/ for an AMG, while others like me certainly don't. Horses for courses, as the Aussies say. ;-)
I enjoy a smooth silky ride, elegant exterior, luxurious interior, latest safety features & tech, and reliability.
For folks like us, the E300 4-cylinder engine is perfect. Plenty of power with great gas mileage.
My last car was a 6-cylinder (non Mercedes) and honestly, I haven't noticed any real world difference in the last 3 years/40,000 miles of ownership.
But bottom line of the whole discussion is: E300/350 is adequate, even peppy, for many if not most drivers. And those that want more power, have many other options to get it. Do I /need/ an E450? No. Do I /want/ an E450? Yes. Moot point, though, as I ordered a wagon, which, surprisingly, starts with the E450. Some feel the /need/ for an AMG, while others like me certainly don't. Horses for courses, as the Aussies say. ;-)
Any driver going 30-40 mph on 70 mph speed limit 2 lane road under good weather conditions would be stopped and ticketed for obstructing traffic in many if not all US jurisdictions that has such a road. Maximum highway speed limits in the US range from 30 mph (American Samoa) to 85 mph (Texas).
I have no complaints about my E300 in terms of speed and power, but when you drive a v6 is just a more pleasant and effortless to drive around. It has a certain underlying oomph to it.
You probably wouldn't realize it as much, unless everyone here with an e300 has recently driven a v6 of any kind... you just forget how sweet a v6 was compared to a v4 at the end of the day....
I drove a g70 V6 recently, that car has 365 hp and 376 tq and starts at 45k...... car has extremely good reviews..... really can't believe how much we are missing out with these economy specs.... v4 255hp on a 65k car.... at least give us a standard v6....



