Mercedes EQC 400 Undercuts Luxury Competition in Price
By Brett Foote
Mercedes' first all-electric crossover doesn't look like the competition, and it'll sell for far less, too.




Since MB has scheduled a production volume of 50,000 EQC models for 2020 I have hope that they price to move it.
It still comes at a significant premium over the GLC it is based on.




The reason I referred to the term "price" was due to the OP mentioning the cars low price.
I hope that MB uses the same low sub-vented rates of the base GLC's with a decent residual (ideally at 59-60% for 3/15). I can see them moving 50k units then.
Last edited by Wolfman; Dec 5, 2019 at 12:48 AM.
The reason I referred to the term "price" was due to the OP mentioning the cars low price.
I hope that MB uses the same low sub-vented rates of the base GLC's with a decent residual (ideally at 59-60% for 3/15). I can see them moving 50k units then.
While MB is the last to the game (compared to those already out with all electric SUVs) they have the best IMHO (and best priced) overall all-electric "normal" SUV today if ones driving needs can be satisfied with only overnight charging. (Tesla's Model X Insane version is hugely outperforming but is also priced twice as much). However, I am not and have never been an early adopter of any revolutionary technology and mainly because of the amount of time it takes to charge EQC with its shorter range as compared to a Tesla, which is IMHO the only (but very important useable) Model X's advantage over EQC, it is not on my horizon any time soon. Of course I am bias to Mercedes and won't drive anything else and hope petrol engined cars will still be around for the remainder of my lifetime, unless they can figure out how to charge a battery on a go much quicker.




I just saw this again yesterday where another forum member is selling his few months old S63 with 2k miles on it. Over $200k into the car looking for $140k.
This is the worst case scenario of course but eye watering nonetheless.
Back to Op's post, EQC is priced very well especially considering its styling (in/out), equipment and still unmatched IMHO fit and finish that I expect from a true MB. I would have bought it (once available) in a heart beat if not for relatively low range and relatively slow charging. Having said that, it actually does fit the way and where I drive - no longer drive long distances and only in warm climate. I may consider it for second/third MY once first year's gremlins are sorted out. But for now, I still like my petrol.
Trending Topics




Back to Op's post, EQC is priced very well especially considering its styling (in/out), equipment and still unmatched IMHO fit and finish that I expect from a true MB. I would have bought it (once available) in a heart beat if not for relatively low range and relatively slow charging. Having said that, it actually does fit the way and where I drive - no longer drive long distances and only in warm climate. I may consider it for second/third MY once first year's gremlins are sorted out. But for now, I still like my petrol.

I like the idea of EV's and have no long range needs. The supercharger network around Minneapolis is poor anyway, even for Tesla's. I was the first one on the list of our dealer which then was cancelled after 9 months or so since MB is supposed to go to a direct selling model via dealer delivery. We'll see...
So far I am pleased to see that the car looks decent and has the exclusive Nappa option (diamond stitched) that I can't even get on the GLS580. All for under $80k and then $7500 off. So pricing is good. If lease rates are high, however, I can get a pricier GLS450 for the same money.
The unknown is the direct model that will likely not allow me to get the discounts I am used to from the dealer. This could be a big negative.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Last edited by threeMBs; Dec 5, 2019 at 04:13 PM.










