Phantom drain question




The cell imbalance was much lower than expected. In pack 1, the imbalance from average (not maximum spread) was only 7 millivolts (0.007V), which is excellent. Max Pack 1 imbalance is 11mV, still excellent. Pack 2 has an imbalance from average cell voltage of 18 millivolts (0.018V), which is more than twice as much. However, even that is still overall pretty good. I don't see how I could be getting such a large predicted voltage difference (3-6V). That's just not happening according to these figures. The max spread of Pack 2 is 20mV - not super perfect, but still very good overall for an EV pack with that many cells.
So, I'm a bit unsure where to go from here. I will say that when the contactors closed today, my pack had dropped 1% instead of the customary 2% in 30 hours. Different for sure. And it hung on 79% for a while, indicating it wasn't about to drop to 78% as expected. And for those wondering, it was actually much colder last night than on previous nights, so it wasn't a low temperature vs. high temperature issue. I've attached the full diagnostic sheet (5 pages) from my battery in case anyone wants to take a look.
FWIW, MB will warrant a pack if voltage spread is worse than 70mV. A bit high in my opinion, but that's what they've said. That's max to min spread anyway, which is worse than min to average, so I guess that's fine. If anyone has further insights, especially if you have plenty of background on EV battery imbalance, let me know what you think! For now, I guess I'll ignore the issue, charge to 100% a few times to help the pack top balance some more (I basically never do), and then ask for another printout in a year or so to see where things are, and keep an eye out on capacity drops overnight. Per MB techs, my battery is very healthy, and for the most part, I agree. Let me know your thoughts!
your post #100 made me wonder in what cases bms kick in, that I wanted to see also what components involved, I found this link, would item #7 make any sense with your error code that it says bms needs constant power? But I dont know if your error was repeating or this is the standard bms spec.
Last edited by eqe300CZ; Mar 17, 2025 at 06:00 PM.
At some point, when it is convenient, suggest you leave the car unplugged for a couple of weeks at about 50% SOC. Confirm that the 12V battery shows "Good, charged". Then check the SOC after 7 days and 14 days. Even better if you could leave it unused for 3 weeks.
The SOC loss should be no more than 2-3% over this time. Anything more than that will provide more statistical information.




The Best of Mercedes & AMG












Ok thanks to dealer I had access to detailed Xentry short test results (they got report as OTA , remotely btw), I didnt have error since yesterday, details were knowledge wise satisfactory but there wasnt anything suspicious about extra ordinary drain for my uneducated eyes. Report break downs each component and lists errors under this component with a classification letter : ✓, i, f, F . Letter breakdowns here. BMS was ✓ (vendor is hella), I didnt check codes yet but most of them looks like momentary loss of packet/comm. between components, its in Czech I will google them now.
My past errors since prod.:
Multifunction Camera - i - U016887
PTCU powertrain - f - U112A87
Driver Assist. Sys. - i - U186B29
DCCU - i - P13CD8F
Insturment Cluster - i - U011587
MBUX - f - B227D00, B1E7B00, B162997
HV Battery health/breakdown:
I showed bytemaster0 report, they recognised what it is, diagnostic guy was busy, we will schedule next visit for report with them in a week or two that will also give me time to see if there is any calibration going on.
They confirmed no pending OTA update, my last OTA was on MB me: 1/30/2025 upgrade comm module. I dont/didnt have any recall according to VIN.
End of report

Last edited by eqe300CZ; Mar 19, 2025 at 01:35 PM.




I do have one more update for the thread. I charged the car up to 86% while I was at the lab yesterday and drove home. SoC was exactly 80% when I pulled in to the driveway yesterday around 2:30 PM. I left the garage this morning after a few seminars, at around 10:30AM. SoC was still exactly 80%. And I continued to drive at 80% for a while, indicating there was no further drop.
My conclusion at this point is that the "drop" is not a drain. It's a voltage sag post-charging. At no point after driving have I seen the SoC drop further. It's only after charging and leaving the car there for a while. I cannot currently explain why after a snow storm the car was down to 72%. Maybe it was the 12V battery before it was replaced. But, for now, it seems that 1-2% voltage sag is evident after charging.
After I did the BMS recalibration, I will say that it appears to sag more slowly. As mentioned before, I'm going to do some 100% charges, at least a couple, to let it top balance. I may even try the sub-20% BMS recalibration a couple more times just for reference. If I see any new behaviors, I'll definitely post. For now, I know that: 1) There are no shorts in the pack, so I have no safety concerns at the moment. 2) Pack health is generally very good. 3) I'll just have to get used to that small amount of pack voltage sag after charging, until something else changes. For now, it's a small amount, and will easily go unnoticed. It was definitely a new behavior after nearly 2 years of ownership, but it sounds like I won't need to worry about it, and that the battery will likely long outlast the car chassis anyway. Thanks to all those who have followed and participated in this thread! I'll post more information if I find any!
2:30pm -> 10:30Am 0% , thats good news! I read also from other users that they got improvement of range after 12V change. Also your cell values were far from threshold, I will be glad to have those values!












One more caveat to the overnight BMS calibration - it needs to be over 10C°. The car generally won't heat the battery unless it's very, very very cold or you are preconditioning. No chance you had morning preconditioning enabled? Please let us know what you find!



