Notices
General Mercedes Discussion Use this forum to discuss general Mercedes-Benz topics that are not specifically model related.

Wich would you rather have?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 12-28-2005, 10:20 AM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
SuperQ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Dallas Texas
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
06 C230
Question Wich would you rather have?

If you had your choice between a 2001 CL55 AMG fully loaded, and a 2004 CLK55 AMG fully loaded wich would you take. If both cars had around 12k miles and were for the most part in the same shape and were going to cost the same amount.
Old 12-28-2005, 12:18 PM
  #2  
Member
Thread Starter
 
SuperQ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Dallas Texas
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
06 C230
dang no opinions out there??????? i need some help deciding, also would around 50k be a good price for each car?
Old 12-28-2005, 03:08 PM
  #3  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
mleskovar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Huntington Beach, Ca.
Posts: 5,784
Received 148 Likes on 132 Posts
'17 Jaguar XF
Tough, but nice choices. The CL is a far better ride IMHO but will cost more to repair and insure (if that means anything to you).
Old 12-28-2005, 05:15 PM
  #4  
Member
 
OnyxCLK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Cyprus
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'06 CLK200 Cabrio & 04' Peugeot 307
I would go for clk if its a cabrio
Old 12-28-2005, 05:15 PM
  #5  
Member
Thread Starter
 
SuperQ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Dallas Texas
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
06 C230
thanks for your post!
Old 12-28-2005, 05:22 PM
  #6  
Member
Thread Starter
 
SuperQ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Dallas Texas
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
06 C230
nope, it's the normal coup, nota cabro. the cl has 28k miles and is an 01, and the clk has 12k miles and is an 04. the clk is also about 4k more expensive. so does that help in in narrowing the choices? 51k for the clk55 amg and 48k and some change for the 01 cl55 amg.
Old 12-28-2005, 10:48 PM
  #7  
RJC
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
RJC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: 2000 ft over the Fl coast in a B-17
Posts: 5,512
Received 150 Likes on 106 Posts
Which one has more warranty, the 04 CLK? Gotta believe the CL is one expensive car to fix...
Old 12-29-2005, 12:35 PM
  #8  
Super Member
 
~CL500~'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Northern NJ
Posts: 584
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
E90 N54 & W251
Originally Posted by SuperQ
If you had your choice between a 2001 CL55 AMG fully loaded, and a 2004 CLK55 AMG fully loaded wich would you take. If both cars had around 12k miles and were for the most part in the same shape and were going to cost the same amount.
I was in the same boat you were in a few months ago. I was looking for an 04 CLK500 and ended up with an 01 CL500. For me, I was getting more car with the CL and I have no regrets with my decision. Make sure you get a warranty though.

You know my answer....go for the CL.
Old 12-29-2005, 03:47 PM
  #9  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Chi500's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,357
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mercedes
Definately the CLK55. I believe the '01 CL55's arent supercharged. I also like the look of the CLK a lot better. It is also very easy to drive if you drive around in an urban area, because the CLK is small you can zoom in and out of traffic. It also performs better, the CL is a boat. If you want comfort go with the CL, if you want a more sporty ride go with the CLK. But since the CLK has the warranty, especially the one with the free maintenance, I'd go with that.
Old 12-29-2005, 04:27 PM
  #10  
Banned
 
tuscanraider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 2,706
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Bantha
I'd take the CL....you see less of them on the road.
Old 12-29-2005, 05:07 PM
  #11  
Member
Thread Starter
 
SuperQ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Dallas Texas
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
06 C230
or should I just wait for the new 2007's to come out?
Old 12-29-2005, 05:10 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
Stricks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Rancho Mirage
Posts: 361
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2011 E63, 2018 AMG GT Convertible
I'd take the CLK - and it's a personal choice. None of them are cheap to repair no matter what anyone (or BMW) has to say. Ya just gotta like the looks.
Old 12-30-2005, 04:46 PM
  #13  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
davis449's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 1,252
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
2016 BMW Z4 sDrive35i M Sport
I don't like the CLK at all, go with the CL.
Old 12-30-2005, 04:49 PM
  #14  
Member
Thread Starter
 
SuperQ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Dallas Texas
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
06 C230
what about just getting a new C55 amg?
Old 12-30-2005, 07:08 PM
  #15  
Member
Thread Starter
 
SuperQ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Dallas Texas
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
06 C230
Originally Posted by davis449
I don't like the CLK at all, go with the CL.
what is it you don't like about the clk amg?
Old 12-31-2005, 05:12 AM
  #16  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Vik888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 1,690
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2008 E550, 2012 GL450, 2014 GLK350, 2015 S550, 2020 GLC350e
I vote for the CL. Heck, for the price of a CL55 AMG of whatever year, same year S 55 maybe?
Old 01-02-2006, 12:53 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
AshleyAlissa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Fort Myers
Posts: 453
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
E420
Originally Posted by SuperQ
or should I just wait for the new 2007's to come out?
You can get good deals on the CL's now, but I would wait for the 2007 to come out, i am sure the price will drop.
Old 01-03-2006, 12:19 AM
  #18  
Banned
 
BMWvsMercedes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would go with the newer one..2004 CLK55 AMG
Old 01-03-2006, 02:55 PM
  #19  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
davis449's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 1,252
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
2016 BMW Z4 sDrive35i M Sport
Originally Posted by SuperQ
what is it you don't like about the clk amg?
Just never liked the clk in general. The fact that it has "55" after it doesn't change my mind.
Old 01-11-2006, 02:48 PM
  #20  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Stiggs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 7,892
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
2003 CLK55
Originally Posted by SuperQ
nope, it's the normal coup, nota cabro. the cl has 28k miles and is an 01, and the clk has 12k miles and is an 04. the clk is also about 4k more expensive. so does that help in in narrowing the choices? 51k for the clk55 amg and 48k and some change for the 01 cl55 amg.
$51K for the CLK????? Way too expensive dude! 2003 CLK55's are going for $40-45K on Autotrader right now. I'm selling my 2003 CLK55 on auto trader right now for $43K with 22K miles. Maybe that should give you an idea what to pay for it.

as for which one to get...I would say the CLK would be sportier than the CL. CL is pretty big compared to the CLK.
Good luck


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Wich would you rather have?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:58 PM.