AMG Says No to Diesel
AMG Says No To Diesel In Its Future
On a somewhat separate note, it baffles me that people seek out new technologies such as electric/fuel cell vehicles for better efficiency, when diesels have been around for decades, and offer outstanding efficiency and performance without the premium you must pay for a brand new technology. It is the same with grid scale power generation; billions of dollars are spent on developing alternative energy sources, while a clean technology (nuclear fission) is neglected due to many legitimate concerns, but to a great extent, negative preconceived notions...
Sorry, that's my rant for the day; maybe diesels don't belong in AMG cars (AMGs are not intended for endurance racing), but it would be great to see more of them, especially in the C/S classes.
Current diesels are not the stinky slow old junk that we all remember from the 1970s. There is much thanks and rejoicing!
Trending Topics
On a somewhat separate note, it baffles me that people seek out new technologies such as electric/fuel cell vehicles for better efficiency, when diesels have been around for decades, and offer outstanding efficiency and performance without the premium you must pay for a brand new technology. It is the same with grid scale power generation; billions of dollars are spent on developing alternative energy sources, while a clean technology (nuclear fission) is neglected due to many legitimate concerns, but to a great extent, negative preconceived notions...
Sorry, that's my rant for the day; maybe diesels don't belong in AMG cars (AMGs are not intended for endurance racing), but it would be great to see more of them, especially in the C/S classes.
Its very annoying that the US continues to ignore diesel applications and continues to sell Hybrids that cost $6-7K above the gas versions while MB sells diesels about $1K higher than the comparable gas models.
Enough on my rant about diesel sales.
As far as AMG and diesel, why not give it a try. They are putting twin turbos in gas engines to get horsepower and torque out of smaller engines. Why not use diesel. If you have driven one, you know how much torque they can have. I'm guessing the powers to be don't like the diesel sound compared to the gas versions. Heck, MB has even build a diesel SLK sports car in Europe but wont bring it to the US.
Come on MB, why be so stubborn?
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
I agree that the lack of diesel vehicles in the US is frustrating, but car manufacturers are NOT to blame. Many people (Americans especially) are resistant to the idea of diesels, as they have a preconceived notion of loud motors that won't start in the cold, emit a horrible sulfurous odor, and leave a trail of soot wherever they go. This is, of course, not an accurate description of modern diesel engines, but how can a company be reasonably expected to offer a product that 90% of their market will not consider buying? (that is not a real #)
I think the question we must ask is who benefits by promoting gasoline engines over diesels... oil refineries maybe?
I'm not the most educated person on this topic, but I would guess a major part of the reason we don't see many diesels in the US is because somebody has something to lose, and they have the juice to prevent it...
Okay I'm finished.
true story;
On my 08 Duramax, it uses a Diesel Particulate Filter (DPF), what it does is capture all the soot that burning diesel fuel creates. When the DPF is full, the ECU uses fuel from the tank to superheat the exhaust to burn off the soot, and it exits the tailpipe as a impossible to see dust. When you are in "regeneration mode" (the name for the burning off process), your mileage goes down considerably.
So, the geniuses at the EPA have decided that in order to save the visible soot from coming out of the tailpipe, (think 1984 Diesel Rabbits) they USE fuel to stop it.
Makes sense huh? Use more fossil fuel to prevent sooty emissions?
I am not sure if it is being stubborn or not though because these more expensive diesel cars probably have a very limited market appeal. BMW is not going to make just M diesels in the five series and will continue to make the M5 gasser. From what little I have read on the BMW it sounds more like a mixture of their M5 and regular 5 series when getting the M550xd(or what ever it is called) than to be purely getting an "M" car. I have seen estimates for the cost of that M diesel being around $100k USD even though not available in the US and quite frankly at that cost point I'd be looking at an E63 or CLS63 instead because the M diesel would be for a niche market, have probably poor resale value(even more so than an AMG does), and only big benifit would be nice fuel economy and I can brag about my clean tailpipes.
For example, the 2005 E320 and E320CDI both had a sticker price of $49k give or take a couple hundred. However, if you're looking for one right now, the CDI will be, on average, at least $1000 more expensive.
Last edited by njgilligan; Feb 13, 2012 at 10:23 AM.
specially since the future is looking more and more electric / hydrogen as the years go by



Does not sound good at all.







