2010 GL350 Bluetec fuel system corrosion - big problem!
dgiturbo, appreciate your thoughts. I agree with your questions - I'm not a mechanic, but something here just doesn't add up (besides the estimate, that is!).
FWIW, estimate breaks down to $12,701.85 parts (the list is 2 pages long) + $1,583.50 labor + $1,206.68 tax.
And again, for dramatic effect, this is a 2010 bought 8 months ago new. Warranty coverage denied based on "poor fuel quality" exclusion.
To be continued....
I think you are real close to attorney time. I do like the idea of seeing if your insurance company can help. In addition to calling Mercedes USA customer service, I would also directly call the office of the president of MBUSA - they have people who can deal with crazy issues like this whereas you may not get a speedy response through the normal customer support channels .
Last edited by ddruker; Apr 22, 2011 at 02:14 AM.
Perhaps if enough people call their dealer and/or MB USA and tell them they are afraid to fill their tanks for fear of incurring $15K of damage, this will get some attention.
I am hopeful that some backup from my insurance company will be helpful. And of course an attorney is on the list.
I have no drivable car, this is a complete time suck already and I suspect there is much more to come. And that doesn't even count the $15K!!
Pretty damn shameful the way this is unfolding.
really. that simple. is it what the op wants to hear? certainly not. but... dont kill the messenger...

Honestly, water in a fuel system is nearly impossible to prevent. The stuff literally falls from the skies and can get into the fuel delivery systems of the most ardent and cautious fueling stations. We as consumers expect they will do what they can to prevent and remove this water, but even then there can and will be some left in. Which is why systems are normally put in place to seperate the water in the fuel delivery and in the vehicles themselves. So let's say said vehicle has a system in place to remove the water from the fuel before sending it to the engine. If water gets through the entire fuel system, without any warnings from the many computers installed, there are only two possible causes: a design flaw, or a manufacturing flaw.
If there is a design flaw, a system is not properly designed to remove the fuel and most locals here in the U.S. have laws which hold the manufacturer liable for damages which occur from that. On the other hand, if there is a manufacturing flaw, the system was designed well but for some reason - different suppliers, faulty or worn equipment, worker error, something - that product is different from the other products produced by that manufacturer. Most locals here in the U.S. have laws which hold the manufacturer liable for damages which occur from that as well. In either case, the products are considered defective, under the theory of products liability.
Now I'm no lawyer and I certainly have no idea how this specific situation's facts would apply to whatever laws from whatever state or local this person is in, but that's generally the theory of products liability in most of the U.S. If it were me, I would consult with a products liability attorney before moving forward.
Steve (the Pilot, not the Lawyer)




I had similar situation with my 2007 E-class, but it was gasoline version. When they saw CEL on...after 3 days they said engine must be changed. It was leased car and I did not care. It did not cost me a penny....they even gave me back $1500 for inconvenience not driving my car for almost 2 months.
Have you tried another dealer ? Are you sure the one you talking with not trying to rip you off ? It looks and sounds like that...
Good Luck.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
On a slight tangent, this whole situation really does make me grateful for public message boards like this one. Not only do I get to benefit from others' experience and insight, but it will allow for tracking of any similar situations and may help with discovery if there is a design flaw. Or if it turns out it's a manufacturing flaw on my car, it still may not be an isolated incident and someone else may benefit from seeing how this all plays out.
In a way I hope it's a manufacturing flaw, just so others with the same car (and me too going forward once this is fixed) can breathe a little easier at the pump.
Re: the dealer I'm at. I'm not quite ready to pin this on them. They've been responsive and competent before with a tricky-to-diagnose but easy-to-finally-repair suspension bearing defect which came up shortly after I bought the car (it was covered under warranty with no issue). And sadly the SF dealership is barely competent (I went to them originally for this CEL as it is much more convenient, and they just told me the computer didn't tell them enough to know what to do. Said CEL might happen again, and if the computer code then gave them more detail they could try a fix then). We had a 2001 E and had plenty of first-hand experience back then about the limitations of the SF dealer. Nothing has changed.... I do have a terrific independent mechanic, but since I'm of the belief that this really should be something for Mercedes to cover, I can't take it to him. So I'm kind of stuck at RAB for now.
The crazy thing is I really, really like this car (as it seems most of you do as well). When it runs, that is. And we liked our E-class, minus the dealer service experience. So we are definitely potential repeat Mercedes buyers. But this situation is seriously jeopardizing that going forward. I am really hoping that MBUSA will step in and do the right thing here. Not only for me but for the peace of mind of everyone reading this!
let me give you another example (this is a real one). the gas station misplaces the label on the diesel pump. the consumer pumps 2 gallons of "diesel" while in reality it is gas. the gas station attendant realizes his mistake and moves the sign properly 15 minutes later. the consumer runs on the diesel/gas mix for a few miles (uses it all up and damages the fuel system) and then refuels with diesel the next day. truck dies and it costs $10k to fix. who do you think picked the bill? (hint: it was not the dealer and not the gas station).
the buck in such cases stops at whoever cannot prove responsibility further down the line. mercedes is in the clear and the consumer in this case cannot prove that she pumped bad diesel. it does not look good for her.
i hope she reaches some kind of a deal and does not have to pay all that money. i for one if i was her i would be livid as she prolly did nothing wrong. if mb is non-responsive and does not offer some kind of suitable resolution i would be looking for an atty.
Last edited by alx; Apr 22, 2011 at 10:55 AM.
How long was the water present in the system.
Sadly this can happen to anybody you just have to be careful where you take fuel.
We used to have own a dealership in Europe so I know what I am talking about.
If the injectors and pump were exposed to the water for a long time than there is a serious problem due to high pressure but really cannot believe that all components would be damaged.
There is to many unknown was it really just water or some other particles in water that caused the damage.
Definitely get all the used parts back , get the whatever fuel is left in the tank, fuel filter and really good company to check what really was inside your tank.
Sadly bad fuel is never under warranty from any manufacturer.
Last edited by B200Turbo; Apr 22, 2011 at 02:45 PM.
On a slight tangent, this whole situation really does make me grateful for public message boards like this one. Not only do I get to benefit from others' experience and insight, but it will allow for tracking of any similar situations and may help with discovery if there is a design flaw. Or if it turns out it's a manufacturing flaw on my car, it still may not be an isolated incident and someone else may benefit from seeing how this all plays out.
In a way I hope it's a manufacturing flaw, just so others with the same car (and me too going forward once this is fixed) can breathe a little easier at the pump.
Re: the dealer I'm at. I'm not quite ready to pin this on them. They've been responsive and competent before with a tricky-to-diagnose but easy-to-finally-repair suspension bearing defect which came up shortly after I bought the car (it was covered under warranty with no issue). And sadly the SF dealership is barely competent (I went to them originally for this CEL as it is much more convenient, and they just told me the computer didn't tell them enough to know what to do. Said CEL might happen again, and if the computer code then gave them more detail they could try a fix then). We had a 2001 E and had plenty of first-hand experience back then about the limitations of the SF dealer. Nothing has changed.... I do have a terrific independent mechanic, but since I'm of the belief that this really should be something for Mercedes to cover, I can't take it to him. So I'm kind of stuck at RAB for now.
The crazy thing is I really, really like this car (as it seems most of you do as well). When it runs, that is. And we liked our E-class, minus the dealer service experience. So we are definitely potential repeat Mercedes buyers. But this situation is seriously jeopardizing that going forward. I am really hoping that MBUSA will step in and do the right thing here. Not only for me but for the peace of mind of everyone reading this!
The difference here is your vehicle STILL DROVE to a further away dealer, in limp home mode. If there was that much water to "corrode" and destroy the entire fuel system, how does the engine still run??? Either you have found a way to run a CDI/Bluetec on water or something else is wrong. The only time mine has ever gone into limp home was from a bad fuel pressure sensor, replaced under warranty.
I suspect it's time you have an attorney with automobile product liability/merchantability experience give MBUSA a call.
And if you can actually run the vehicle on water please give ME a call.
I'd be livid if they tried blaming this on me. Kudos for keeping your cool in all of this nonsense. If MB won't do right by you, get a lawyer and take them to court for what you owe on the car.
Back to another posters comment, but what if there was a possibility that one of the diesel pumps contained biodiesel vice the advertised diesel? The car would run but eat it's fuel system in the process.
The situation as it stands (according to the service manager and service advisor) is that they have not taken apart the whole system. But since they found rust in the tank (couldn't explain rust in a plastic tank) and rust at the other end of the fuel system, they are assuming there is rust everywhere in between.
Again I asked my questions about how much water and how long (and how come they didn't answer those in my email several days prior!). I also asked about the fuel pump and the water extractor and have they looked to that part in particular for failure. Making the point, and as many have here, how do you go from a fill-up at the station to massive, $15K damage with no warning?
The reality is that I don't they have any of these answers (why can't people just straight up say they don't know or don't have an answer yet but they will get to it? It's like parting the seas of evasion and platitudes first! And why did I have to go in person to even get an "I don't know" instead of them just replying to my email!!) In hindsight I should have asked to talk with the shop foreman, but I didn't think of it until after we were gone.
Anyway, they've also put things on hold waiting for my insurance inspector to come (the right decision). So that is the next step (and also why I'll hold off on getting a lawyer for now).
The good news is they have not gotten rid of any parts or drained the fuel tank, so they'll be sending in a fuel sample for testing. I suspect this will go on for some time, and will update everyone as we go.
What you are suggesting is an out of the ordinary situation. What I suggest is a fault in design or manufacture of a system intended to deal with day-to-day, normal situations an average and reasonable person would expect to encounter. And there's still the confusion about how water can corrode a mostly plastic system, but that's a different subject.
This is how I see it. If it is a gas station problem, but she cannot pinpoint which one... Why is it mb's problem?
Last edited by alx; Apr 23, 2011 at 02:09 PM.




BMW went through a similar situation over a decade ago with their Nikasil coating. They blamed the failure on fuel that was too high in sulfur - not their fault. The high sulfer content caused the Nikasil coating to degrade. Of course, with an aluminum bore and aluminum pistons and no coating between them, the engine will seize. Many did just that. BMW ended up replacing a bunch of engines are extending the warranties on even more.
Good luck!
If you insist on this, and the dealer KNOWS you will insist, He also might be a little more careful about which components he says need to be replaced! (and, or course, each piece has its own labor charge to remove and replace - all of which quickly add up)
This is how I see it. If it is a gas station problem, but she cannot pinpoint which one... Why is it mb's problem?



